Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology

2018 Edition
| Editors: Jeffrey S. Kreutzer, John DeLuca, Bruce Caplan

Token Test

  • Janet P. PattersonEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57111-9_931

Description

The Token Test and its variants are used to assess auditory comprehension in persons with developmental and acquired disorders affecting language. The examinee provides a gestural response (pointing to or moving plastic tokens) in response to a verbal command (e.g., touch the small, white circle). In its most commonly used form, the Token Test includes 20 tokens that vary in color, size, and shape. The test is divided into sections according to the length of the command, syntactic complexity, and working-memory demand; the commands become more difficult within each section and across sections. For example, a command in an early section might be “Point to the circle” in an array containing only one circle, while in a later section a command might be, “After picking up the green rectangle, touch the small white circle,” in an array of 20 tokens containing multiple tokens of each dimension.

There are several variants of the original Token Test (DeRenzi and Vignolo 1962),...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References and Reading

  1. Boller, F., & Vignolo, L. A. (1966). Latent sensory aphasia in hemisphere-damaged patients: An experimental study with the Token Test. Brain, 89, 815–830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. DeRenzi, E. (1979). A shortened version of the Token Test. In F. J. Boller & M. Dennis (Eds.), Auditory comprehension: Clinical and experimental studies with the Token Test (pp. 33–44). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  3. DeRenzi, E., & Ferrari, C. (1978). The Reporter’s Test: A sensitive test to detect expressive disturbances in aphasics. Cortex, 14(2), 279–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. DeRenzi, E., & Vignolo, L. (1962). The Token Test: A sensitive test to detect receptive disturbances in aphasics. Brain, 85, 665–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Franzen, M. (2000). Reliability and validity in neuropsychological assessment. New York: Springer, Chap. 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hula, W., Doyle, P. J., McNeil, M. R., & Mikolic, J. M. (2006). Rasch modeling of revised Token Test performance: Validity and sensitivity to change. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 49, 27–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ivnik, R. J., Malec, J. F., Smith, J. E., Tangalos, E. G., & Petersen, R. C. (1996). Neuropsychological tests’ norms above age 55: COWAT, BNT, MAE token, WRAT-R reading, AMNART, STROOP, TMT, and JLO. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 10, 262–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lorenzini, P. M., Fioravit, E., Poli, C., & Lombardi, B. (2015). Reliability of the 36-item versin of the Token Test in patients with poststroke aphasia. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 22(5), 374–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. McGhee, R. L., Ehrler, D. J., & DiSimoni, F. (2007). TTFC-2: Token Test for children (2nd ed.). Austin: Pro Ed.Google Scholar
  10. McNeil, M. R., & Prescott, T. E. (1978). The Revised Token Test. Austin: Pro Ed.Google Scholar
  11. McNeil, M. R., Pratt, S. R., Szuminsky, N., Sung, J. E., Fossett, T. R., Fassbinder, W., & Lim, K. Y. (2015). Reliability and validity of the computerized Revised Token Test: Comparison of reading and listening versions in persons with and without aphasia. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 58(2), 311–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Park, G. H., McNeil, M. R., & Tompkins, C. A. (2000). Reliability of the five-item Revised Token Test for individuals with aphasia. Aphasiology, 14, 527–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Pratt, S., Eberwein, C., McNeil, M., Ortmann, A., Roxberg, J., Fossett, T., et al. (2006). The computerized Revised Token Test: Assessing the impact of age and sound intensity. Sheffield: International Aphasia Rehabilitation Conference.Google Scholar
  14. Spellacy, F. J., & Spreen, O. (1969). A short form of the Token Test. Cortex, 5, 390–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Spreen, O., & Risser, A. H. (2003). Assessment of aphasia. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Chap. 7.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology ServiceVA Northern California Health Care SystemMartinezUSA