Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology

2018 Edition
| Editors: Jeffrey S. Kreutzer, John DeLuca, Bruce Caplan


  • Kate KrivalEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57111-9_916


The suprasegmental features (segments are sounds) of speech conveyed by pitch, loudness, and rhythm and perceived as melody and word stress (Monrad-Krohn 1948; Wymer et al. 2002). Linguistic, or intrinsic, prosody aids meaning; for example, convict versus convict, or a rising pitch at the end of a sentence to signify a question. Affective, or extrinsic, prosody conveys attitude; for example, incredulity, disdain, sadness, or anger. Expression of prosody appears to be primarily dependent on right hemisphere functions (linguistic prosody also involves left hemisphere language centers) and motor planning and programming. Intact motor pathways and speech end organs for respiration, phonation, resonance, and articulation are required as well (Baum and Pell 1999; Boutsen and Christman 2002; Duffy 2005; Ross and Monnot 2008). Perception of prosody is similarly bilateral and mostly overlapping (Witteman et al. 2014, but affective and linguistic prosody diverge to activate different...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References and Readings

  1. Baum, S. R., & Pell, M. D. (1999). The neural bases of prosody: Insights from lesion studies and neuroimaging. Aphasiology, 13, 581–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Belyk, M., & Brown, S. (2014). Perception of affective and linguistic prosody: An ALE meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. SCAN, 9, 1395–1403.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Boutsen, F. R., & Christman, S. S. (2002). Prosody in apraxia of speech. Seminars in Speech and Language, 23, 245–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown, M., Salverda, A. P., Dilley, L. C., & Tannenhaus, M. K. (2015). Metrical expectations from preceding prosody influence perception of lexical stress. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 41(2), 306–323.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Duffy, J. R. (2005). Motor speech disorders: Substrates, differential diagnosis, and management. St. Louis: Mosby.Google Scholar
  6. Monrad-Krohn, G. H. (1948). Dysprosdy or altered ‘melody of language’. Brain, 70, 405–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ross, E. D., & Monnot, M. (2008). Neurology of affective prosody and its functional-anatomic organization in right hemisphere. Brain and Language, 104(1), 51–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Witteman, J., Goerlich-Dobre, K. S., Martens, S., Aleman, A., Van Heuven, V. J., & Schiller, N. O. (2014). The nature of hemispheric specialization for prosody perception. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 14, 1104–1114.Google Scholar
  9. Wymer, J. H., Lindman, L. S., & Booksh, R. L. (2002). A neuropsychological perspective of aprosody: Features, function, assessment and treatment. Applied Neuropsychology, 9(1), 37–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Speech Pathology, School of Health SciencesEdinboro University of PennsylvaniaEdinboroUSA