Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology

2018 Edition
| Editors: Jeffrey S. Kreutzer, John DeLuca, Bruce Caplan

Inattentional Blindness

  • Robert FieoEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57111-9_9139

Tests of inattentional blindness (IB) can be viewed as an assessment of one’s ability to divert cognitive resources. IB refers to a phenomenon in which individuals, when observing a visual scene, fail to see an often unexpected, but salient, stimulus even when it appears in the immediate environment. This paradigm was first developed by Mack and Rock (1998) to explore the association between attention and perception. In a typical test of IB, participants are presented with a perceptual discrimination task, for example, they may be asked to compare two arms of a cross on a computer screen. While doing so, an unexpected stimulus appears on the scene for a brief period of time. Observers are then are asked to report whether they had noticed anything other than the stimuli they had been asked to attend to. In a series of studies investigating this phenomenon, Mack and Rock (1998) reported that approximately 40–85% of observers did not detect the presence of an unexpected stimulus at...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Fukuda, K., & Vogel, E. K. (2009). Human variation in overriding attentional capture. Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 8726–8733.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Kreitz, C., Furley, P., Memmert, D., & Simons, D. J. (2016). The influence of attention set, working memory capacity, and expectations on inattentional blindness. Perception, 45(4), 386–399.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Lavie, N. (2005). Distracted and confused? Selective attention under load. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 75–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Mack, A., & Rock, I. (1998). Inattentional blindness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  5. Memmert, D. (2006). The effects of eye movements, age, and expertise on inattentional blindness. Consciousness and Cognition, 15(3), 620–627.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Most, S. B., Simons, D. J., Scholl, B. J., Jimenez, R., Clifford, E., & Chabris, C. F. (2001). How not to be seen: The contribution of similarity and selective ignoring to sustained inattentional blindness. Psychological Science, 12(1), 9–17.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Most, S. B., Scholl, B. J., Clifford, E. R., & Simons, D. J. (2005). What you see is what you set: Sustained inattentional blindness and the capture of awareness. Psychological Review, 112, 217–242.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. O’Shea, D. M., & Fieo, R. A. (2015). Individual differences in fluid intelligence predicts inattentional blindness in a sample of older adults: A preliminary study. Psychological Research, 79(4), 570–578.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Seegmiller, J. K., Watson, J. M., & Strayer, D. L. (2011). Individual differences in susceptibility to inattentional blindness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 1123–1112.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Aging and Geriatric ResearchCollege of Medicine, Institute on Aging, University of FloridaGainesvilleUSA