Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology

2018 Edition
| Editors: Jeffrey S. Kreutzer, John DeLuca, Bruce Caplan

Behavioral Inattention Test (BIT)

  • Elena PolejaevaEmail author
  • Adam J. Woods
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57111-9_9134

The Behavioral Inattention Test (BIT) was developed in the United Kingdom in 1987 to assess hemi-inattention and has predominantly been used with stroke patients to assess unilateral spatial neglect (Wilson et al. 1987b; Halligan et al. 1991). Unilateral spatial neglect is commonly defined as an inability to respond to or notice stimuli that is present on the side opposite of the brain lesion location. This spatial neglect is not attributed to motor or sensory deficits (Heilman et al. 1993). In an attempt to improve ecological validity, the BIT incorporated nine behavioral subtests in addition to six conventional subtests. The behavioral subtests aim to assess unilateral spatial neglect as well as an individual’s functioning on activities of daily living.

The BIT takes approximately 40 min to complete and can be administered to individuals ages 19–83. The conventional subtests consist of line crossing, star cancellation, letter cancellation, line bisection, figure/ shape copying, and...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Azouvi, P. (2016). The ecological assessment of unilateral neglect. Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2015.12.005.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Buxbaum, L. J., Ferraro, M. K., Veramonti, T., Farne, A., Whyte, J., Ladavas, E., et al. (2004). Hemispatial neglect: Subtypes, neuroanatomy, and disability. Neurology, 62, 749–756.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Cherney, L. R., Halper, A. S., Kwasnica, C. M., Harvey, R. L., & Zhang, M. (2001). Recovery of functional status after right hemisphere stroke: Relationship with unilateral neglect. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 82, 322–328.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Di Monaco, M., Schintu, S., Dotta, M., Barba, S., Tappero, R., & Gindri, P. (2011). Severity of unilateral spatial neglect is an independent predictor of functional outcome after acute inpatient rehabilitation in individuals with right hemispheric stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 92, 1250–1255.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Franceschini, M., La Porta, F., Agosti, M., & Massucci, M. (2010). Is health-related-quality of life of stroke patients influenced by neurological impairments at one year after stroke? European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 46, 389–399.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Gillen, R., Tennen, H., & McKee, T. (2005). Unilateral spatial neglect: Relation to rehabilitation outcomes in patients with right hemisphere stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 86, 763–767.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Halligan, P. W., Cockburn, J., & Wilson, B. (1991). The behavioural assessment of visual neglect. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 1, 5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hartman-Maeir, A., & Katz, N. (1995). Validity of the behavioral inattention test (BIT): Relationships with functional tasks. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 49, 507–516.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Heilman, K. M., Watson, R. T., & Walenstein, E. (1993). Neglect and related disorders. In K. M. Heilman & E. Valenstein (Eds.), Clinical neuropsychology (pp. 279–336). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Jehkonen, M., Ahonen, J. P., Dastidar, P., Koivisto, A. M., Laippala, P., Vilkki, J., & Molnar, G. (2000). Visual neglect as a predictor of functional outcome one year after stroke. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, 101, 195–201.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Jehkonen, M., Laihosalo, M., & Kettunen, J. E. (2006). Impact of neglect on functional outcome after stroke: A review of methodological issues and recent research findings. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 24, 209–215.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Lezak, M. D., Howieson, D. B., Bigler, E. D., & Tranel, D. (2012). Neuropsychological assessment (5th ed.pp. 428–439). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Lopes, M. A., Ferreira, H. P., Carvalho, J. C., Cardoso, L., & Andre, C. (2007). Screening tests are not enough to detect hemineglect. Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, 65, 1192–1195.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Wilson, B., Cockburn, J., & Halligan, P. W. (1987a). Behavioural inattention test manual. Hants/Los Angeles: Thames Valley Test Company/Western Psychological Services.Google Scholar
  15. Wilson, B., Cockburn, J., & Halligan, P. W. (1987b). Development of a behavioural test of visuospatial neglect. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 68, 98–102.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Clinical and Health PsychologyUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of Clinical and Health PsychologyCollege of Public Health and Health Professions, University of FloridaGainesvilleUSA
  3. 3.Center for Cognitive Aging and MemoryMcKnight Brain Institute, University of FloridaGainesvilleUSA
  4. 4.Department of NeuroscienceUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA