Abstraction; Big idea; Deeper meaning; Essence; Gestalt; Holistic; Integration; Macrostructure; Synthesis
One of the most ubiquitous and foundational cognitive abilities to everyday life function is the ability to understand and extract the essence of the vast amount of information to which one is exposed. This ability to reduce massive amounts of details into big ideas is termed gist processing (Chapman and Mudar 2013). Gist is defined as the ability to abstract and synthesize meanings from large data input, whether from lectures, articles, works of art, movies, legal documents, and medical instructions, among other sources of input.
Gist ability is a higher-order cognitive function that entails constructive/integrative processes whereby explicit meanings are transformed and reduced into holistic ideas. As such, the whole turns out to be much more than can be derived from the sum of its parts. For example, the individual words or depicted items in a...
References and Readings
- Chapman, S. B. (2013). Make your brain smarter: Increase your brain’s creativity, energy, and focus. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
- Chapman, S. B., & Mudar, R. A. (2014). Enhancement of cognitive and neural functions through complex reasoning training: Evidence from normal and clinical populations. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2014.00069.
- Chapman, S. B., Gamino, J. G., & Mudar, R. A. (2011). Higher-order strategic gist reasoning in adolescence. In V. Reyna, S. B. Chapman, M. R. Dougherty, & J. Confrey (Eds.), The adolescent brain: Learning, reasoning, and decision making (pp. 123–152). New York: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
- Chapman, S. B., Aslan, S., Spence, J. S., Hart, J. J., Bartz, E. K., Didehbani, N., Keebler, M. W., Gardner, C. M., Strain, J. F., & Defina, L. F. (2013). Neural mechanisms of brain plasticity with complex cognitive training in healthy seniors. Cerebral Cortex. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bht234.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Cook, L. G., Chapman, S. B., & Gamino, J. F. (2007). Impaired discourse gist in pediatric brain injury: Missing the forest for the trees. In K. Cain & J. Oakhill (Eds.), Children’s comprehension problems in oral and written language: A cognitive perspective (pp. 218–243). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Gamino, J. F., & Chapman, S. B. (2009). Reasoning in children with ADHD: A review of current research. Current Medical Literature: Pediatrics, 22(3), 65–73.Google Scholar
- Gamino, J. F., Chapman, S. B., Hull, E. L., & Lyon, R. (2010). Effects of higher-order cognitive strategy training on gist reasoning and fact learning in adolescents. Frontiers in Educational Psychology, 1. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00188.
- Levine, B., Schweizer, T. A., O’Connor, C., Turner, G., Gillingham, S., Stuss, D. T., … Robertson, I. H. (2011). Rehabilitation of executive functioning in patients with frontal lobe brain damage with goal management training. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5(9). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2011.00009.
- Novakovic-Agopian, T., Chen, A. J. W., Rome, S., Abrams, G., Castelli, H., Rossi, A., et al. (2011). Rehabilitation of executive functioning with training in attention regulation applied to individually defined goals: A pilot study bridging theory, assessment, and treatment. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 26(5), 325–338.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Vas, A., Chapman, S., Aslan, S., Spence, J., Keebler, M., Rodriguez-Larrain, G., Rodgers, B., Jantz, T., Martinez, D., Rakic, J., & Krawczyk, D. (2015a). Reasoning training in veteran and civilian traumatic brain injury with persistent mild impairment. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2015.1044013.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Vas, A. K., Chapman, S. B., & Cook, L. G. (2015b). Language impairments in traumatic brain injury: A window into complex cognitive performance. In A. Salazar & J. Grafman (Eds.), Handbook of clinical neurology: Traumatic brain injury part II (Vol. 128, pp. 497–510). Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar