Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology

2018 Edition
| Editors: Jeffrey S. Kreutzer, John DeLuca, Bruce Caplan

Interdisciplinary Team Rehabilitation

  • Stephanie HookerEmail author
  • Erin E. Emery-Tiburcio
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57111-9_404

Synonyms

Rehabilitation team; Team

Definition

Individuals from diverse disciplines making unique, complementary contributions with a unified purpose to improve the outcome of patient-focused care beyond that of team members working separately. This is in contrast to multidisciplinary care, in which individual disciplines each work with the same patient or set of patients but do not operate as a cohesive, integrated whole.

Current Knowledge

Characteristics of successful interdisciplinary teams reflected in the literature include patient-focused care with highly integrated, collective goals across disciplines and a highly collaborative working environment with shared decision-making (see Suddick and De Souza 2006for a review). Activities associated with interdisciplinary teams include defining team-based goals, examining progress toward goals and revising as necessary, identifying patient and family response to treatment along with barriers to treatment and discharge, defining the...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References and Readings

  1. Halm, M. A., Goering, M., & Smith, M. (2003). Interdisciplinary rounds: Impact on patients, families, and staff. Clinical Nurse Specialist, 17(3), 133–1142.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Kadivar, Z., English, A., & Marx, B. D. (2016). Understanding the relationship between physical therapist participation in interdisciplinary rounds and hospital readmission rates: Preliminary study. Physical Therapy, 96, 1705–1713.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Korner, M. (2010). Interprofessional teamwork in medical rehabilitation: A comparison of multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary team approach. Clinical Rehabilitation, 24, 745–755.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Neumann, V., Gutenbrunner, C., Fialka-Moser, V., Christodoulou, N., Varela, E., Giustini, A., & Delarque, A. (2010). Interdisciplinary team working in physical and rehabilitation medicine. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 42, 4–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Pietilä Holmner, E., Fahlström, M., & Nordström, A. (2013). The effects of interdisciplinary team assessment and a rehabilitation program for patients with chronic pain. Physical Medicine and. Rehabilitation, 92, 77–83.Google Scholar
  6. Suddick, K. M., & De Souza, L. (2006). Therapists’ experiences and perceptions of teamwork in neurological rehabilitation: Reasoning behind the team approach, structure and composition of the team and teamworking processes. Physiotherapy Research International, 11(2), 72–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. White, M. J., Gutierrez, A., McLaughlin, C., Eziakonwa, C., Stephens Newman, L., White, M., et al. (2013). A pilot for understanding interdisciplinary teams in rehabilitation practice. Rehabilitation Nursing, 38, 142–152.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Behavioral SciencesRush University Medical CenterChicagoUSA