Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology

2018 Edition
| Editors: Jeffrey S. Kreutzer, John DeLuca, Bruce Caplan

Myers-Briggs Inventories

  • Stephanie A. Reid-ArndtEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57111-9_2027

Synonyms

MBTI

Definition

The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) is a self-report personality inventory. Based on type theory proposed by Carl Jung, it was developed from a conceptualization of personality preferences as dichotomous constructs (i.e., a person is either an introvert or an extrovert). This framework contrasts with most personality tests, which are constructed based on trait theory, according to which personality is derived from habitual ways of thinking and behaving (traits) that exist on a continuum. The four preferences in the MBTI are extraversion-introversion (EI, oriented inward or outward), sensing-intuition (SN, reliance on sensorial information versus intuition), thinking-feeling (TF, tendency to make judgments based on logical analysis or personal values), and judgment-perception (JP, preference for using either TF or SN processes for interacting with the world). Because the four scales each have two dimensions, 16 personality types (letter combinations) can be...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References and Readings

  1. Barbuto, J. E. (1997). A critique of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and its operationalization of Carl Jung’s psychological types. Psychological Reports, 80, 611–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boyle, G. J. (1995). Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI): Some psychometric limitations. Australian Psychologist, 30, 71–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carlson, J. G. (1985). Recent assessments of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 356–365.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Dudding, B. A., & Dudding, G. S. (1995). Exploring psychological type in children with attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and attention deficit disorder (ADD). In Proceedings: XI International Conference, Association for Psychological Type (pp. 19–22), Kansas City.Google Scholar
  5. Furnham, A. (1996). The big five versus the big four: The relationship between the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) and the NEO-PI five factor model of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 303–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Furnham, A., & Stringfield, P. (1993). Personality and work performance: Myers-Briggs Type Indicator correlates of managerial performance in two cultures. Personality and Individual Differences, 14, 145–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Furnham, A., Moutafi, J., & Crump, J. (2003). The relationship between the revised NEO-personality inventory and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Social Behaviour and Personality, 31, 577–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gardner, W. L., & Martinko, M. J. (1996). Using the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator to study managers: A literature review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 22, 45–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hammer, A. L., & Mitchell, W. D. (1996). The distribution of MBTI types in the US by gender and ethnic group. Journal of Psychological Type, 37, 2–15.Google Scholar
  10. Harvey, R. J., Murry, W. D., & Markham, S. E. (1994). Evaluation of the three short-form versions of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63, 181–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hunsley, J., Lee, C. M., & Wood, J. M. (2003). Controversial and questionable assessment techniques. In S. O. Lilienfeld, S. J. Lynn, & J. M. Lohr (Eds.), Science and pseudoscience in clinical psychology (pp. 39–76). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  12. Jackson, S. L., Parker, C. P., & Dipboye, R. L. (1996). A comparison of competing models underlying responses to the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Journal of Career Assessment, 4, 99–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jung, C. G. (1971). Collected works of C. G. Jung: Vol. 6. Psychological types (trans: Baynes, H. G., revised by R. F. C. Hull). Princeton: Princeton University Press (Original work published 1921).Google Scholar
  14. Kaufman, A. S., Kaufman, N. L., & McLean, J. E. (1993). Profiles of Hispanic adolescents and adults on the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 76, 628–630.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. McCaulley, M. H. (1985). The selection ratio type table: A research strategy for comparing type distributions. Journal of Psychological Type, 10, 46–56.Google Scholar
  16. McCaulley, M. H., & Martin, C. R. (1995). Career assessment and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Journal of Career Assessment, 3, 219–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1989). Reinterpreting the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator from the perspective of the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Personality, 57, 17–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Myers, I. B. (1962). The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator manual. Princeton: Educational Testing Service.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Myers, I. B., & McCaulley, M. H. (1985). Manual: A guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (2nd ed.). Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  20. Myers, I. B., McCaulley, M. H., Quenk, N. L., & Hammer, A. L. (1998). MBTI manual: A guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (3rd ed.). Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  21. Pietri-Taleb, F., Riihimäki, H., Viikari-Juntura, E., & Lindström, K. (1994). Longitudinal study on the role of personality characteristics and psychological distress in neck trouble among working men. Pain, 58, 261–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pittenger, D. J. (1993). The utility of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Review of Educational Research, 63, 467–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pittenger, D. J. (2005). Cautionary comments regarding the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 57, 210–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Quenk, N. L. (2000). Essentials of Myers-Briggs Type Indicator assessment. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  25. Saggino, L. J., Cooper, C., & Kline, P. (2001). A confirmatory factor analysis of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Shi, R., & Yang, Y. (2009). Exploring the construct validity of the Chinese version of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator G. Social Behaviour and Personality, 37, 591–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Health Professions – Health PsychologyUniversity of MissouriColumbiaUSA