Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology

2018 Edition
| Editors: Jeffrey S. Kreutzer, John DeLuca, Bruce Caplan

Multiaxial Assessment

  • Monica KuryloEmail author
  • Edward Liebmann
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57111-9_2026

Synonyms

multiaxial evaluation; multi-faceted assessment

Definition and Historical Background

Multiaxial assessment refers to a system of evaluation grounded in the biopsychosocial model of disease. The multiaxial system facilitates the organization of complex case information while allowing for the consideration of patient heterogeneity (American Psychiatric Association 1994). Multiaxial assessment and diagnosis prior to 2014 occurred in accordance with the DSM-IV-TR (APA 2000) and the five axes comprising the multiaxial system. Axis I was used for the documentation of all psychiatric disorders with the exception of personality disorder and mental retardation, which were recorded on Axis II. Axis III was used to document medical conditions that may be contributing to the clinical presentation. Axis IV was used for the documentation of psychosocial and environmental problems relevant to the presenting condition. Axis V was comprised of the General Assessment of Functioning (GAF), a...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References and Readings

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  2. American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  3. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington: American Psychiatric Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Averill, R. F., Mullin, R. L., Steinbeck, B. A., Goldfield, N. I., Grant, T. M., & Butler, R. R. (2009). Development of the ICD-10 procedure coding system (ICD-10-PCS). https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Coding/ICD10/downloads/pcs_final_report2012.pdf. Accessed 28 Dec 2015.
  5. Gold, L. H. (2014). DSM-5 and the assessment of functioning: The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0). The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 42, 173–181.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Goldstein, M. A., Ivanov, I., & Silverman, M. E. (2011). Posterior cortical atrophy: An exemplar for renovating diagnostic formulation in neuropsychiatry. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 52, 326–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kupfer, D. J., Kuhl, E. A., & Reiger, D. A. (2013). DSM-5: The future arrived. Journal of the American Medical Association, 309, 1691–1692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lezak, M., Howieson, D. B., Bigler, E. D., & Tranel, D. (2012). Neuropsychological assessment (5th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Millon, T. (1992). Millon clinical multiaxial inventory: I & II. Journal of Counseling and Development, 70, 421–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Oken, D. (2000). Multiaxial diagnosis and the psychosomatic model of disease. Psychosomatic Medicine, 62, 171–175.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Trestman, R. L. (2014). DSM-5 and personality disorders: Where did Axis II go? The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 4, 141–145.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departments of Psychiatry and Rehabilitation MedicineUniversity of Kansas Medical CenterKansas CityUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyThe University of KansasLawrenceUSA