Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology

2018 Edition
| Editors: Jeffrey S. Kreutzer, John DeLuca, Bruce Caplan

Roland-Morris Questionnaire

  • Tamara BushnikEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57111-9_1963




Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ) is a health status measure to assess physical disability due to lower back pain (www.rmdq.org). This instrument was designed in the UK as an outcome measure for clinical trial research but has also been used to monitor patients in clinical practice (Roland and Morris 1983). It consists of 24 statements that relate to physical function that could be affected by lower back pain. Individuals completing the RDQ simply place a check mark beside each statement that is true; thus, the score of the RDQ ranges from zero (no disability) to 24 (maximum disability). It can be administered on paper, on computer, and by telephone. The RDQ is available in 48 different languages. It is in the public domain but the authors request that they be contacted if it is translated into another language.

The original RDQ can be modified to change the question stem from “because of my back” to “because of my back or leg problem,” which expands...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References and Readings

  1. Beurskens, A., de Vet, H. C. W., & Koke, A. J. A. (1996). Responsiveness of functional status in low back pain: A comparison of different instruments. Pain, 65, 71–76.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Deyo, R., & Centor, R. (1986). Assessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change: An analogy to diagnose test performance. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 39, 897–906.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Jarvikoski, A., Mellin, G., & Estlander, A. (1995). Outcome of two multimodal back treatment programmes with and without intensive physical training. Journal of Spinal Disorders, 6, 93–98.Google Scholar
  4. Johansson, E., & Lindberg, P. (1998). Subacute and chronic low back pain: Reliability and validity of a Swedish version of the Roland and Morris disability questionnaire. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 30, 139–143.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Jordan, K., Dunn, K. M., Lewis, M., & Croft, P. (2006). A minimal clinically important difference was derived for the Roland-Morris disability questionnaire for low back pain. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59, 45–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Patrick, D. L., Deyo, R. A., Atlas, S. J., Singer, D. E., Chapin, A., & Keller, R. B. (1995). Assessing health-related quality of life in patients with sciatica. Spine, 20, 1899–1908.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Roland, M., & Morris, R. A. (1983). Study of the natural history of back pain. Part 1: Development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in back pain. Spine, 8, 141–144.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Roland, M., & Fairbank, J. (2000). The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire. Spine, 25, 3115–2124.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Inter-Hospital Research and Knowledge TranslationRusk RehabilitationNew YorkUSA