Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology

2018 Edition
| Editors: Jeffrey S. Kreutzer, John DeLuca, Bruce Caplan

Tower of London

  • Denise KrchEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57111-9_1912

Synonyms

Tower of Hanoi; Tower of Toronto

Description

The Tower of London (TOL) is an executive function task utilized primarily to assess planning capacity, although it can also be used to evaluate working memory, rule learning, the ability to inhibit responding, self-monitoring and regulation, problem solving, and establishing and maintaining set. There are a multitude of TOL tasks in existence, but the initial TOL was devised by Tim Shallice (1982) as an improvement upon the Tower of Hanoi (TOH) task (see Historical Background). Shallice employed his TOL to assess planning in patients with frontal lobe lesions.

Shallice’s TOL task consists of two boards, each of which contains three vertical pegs of increasing length and three different colored (red, blue, and green) beads or balls that are placed onto the pegs. The shortest peg only accommodates one bead; the second, two; and the third, three. On the examiner’s board, the beads are arranged on the pegs in a goal position, and on...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References and Reading

  1. Baron, I. S. (2004). Neuropsychological evaluation of the child. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Berg, W. K., & Byrd, D. L. (2002). The tower of London spatial problem-solving task: Enhancing clinical and research implementation. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 24(5), 586–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brooks, P. H., Sperber, R. J., & McCauley, C. (1984). Learning and cognition in the mentally retarded. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  4. Culbertson, W., & Zillmer, E. A. (2005). Tower of London Drexel University – 2nd edition (TOL-DX 2nd edition). North Tonawanda: Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar
  5. Kafer, K. L., & Hunter, M. (1997). On testing the validity of planning/problem-solving tasks in a normal population. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 3(2), 108–119.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Kaller, C. P., Unterrainer, J. M., Kaiser, S., Weisbrod, M., & Aschenbrenner, S. (2012a). Tower of London—Freiburg version. Mödling: Schuhfried.Google Scholar
  7. Kaller, C. P., Unterrainer, J. M., & Stahl, C. (2012b). Assessing planning ability with the tower of London task: Psychometric properties of a structurally balanced problem set. Psychologial Assessment, 24(1), 46–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kaller, C. P., Debelak, R., Köstering, L., Egle, J., Rahm, B., Wild, P. S., Blettner, M., Beutel, M. E., & Unterrainer, J. M. (2016). Assessing planning ability across the adult life span: Population-representative and age-adjusted reliability estimates for the tower of London (TOL-F). Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 31(2), 148–164.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Köstering, L., Schmidt, C. S., Egger, K., Amtage, F., Peter, J., Klöppel, S., Beume, L. A., Hoeren, M., Weiller, C., & Kaller, C. P. (2015). Assessment of planning performance in clinical samples: Reliability and validity of the tower of London task (TOL-F). Neuropsychologia, 75, 646–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kramer, J., Boxer, A., Cahn-Weiner, D., Johnson, J., Quitania, L., Rankin, K., et al. (n.d.). The assessment of executive functioning: A selective review of the literature. In Examiner. Retrieved, January 30, 2010, from http://examiner.ucsf.edu/Related_Literature/literature_search.htm.
  11. Lezak, M. D., Howieson, D. B., Bigler, E. D., & Tranel, D. (2012). Neuropsychological assessment (5th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Phillips, L. H., Wynn, V., Gilhooly, K. J., Della Sala, S., & Logie, R. H. (1999). The role of memory in the tower of London task. Memory, 7(2), 209–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Saint-Cyr, J. A., Taylor, A. E., & Lang, A. E. (1988). Procedural learning and neostriatal dysfunction in man. Brain, 111(Pt. 4), 941–959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Schnirman, G. M., Welsh, M. C., & Retzlaff, P. D. (1998). Development of the tower of London-revised. Assessment, 5(4), 355–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Shallice, T. (1982). Specific impairments of planning. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London B. Biological Sciences, 298(1089), 199–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ward, G., & Allport, A. (1997). Planning and problem-solving using the 5-disc tower of London task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 50A(1), 49–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kessler FoundationEast HanoverUSA