Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology

2018 Edition
| Editors: Jeffrey S. Kreutzer, John DeLuca, Bruce Caplan

Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory

  • James F. MalecEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57111-9_1818

Synonyms

Mayo-Portland; MPAI; MPAI-4

Description

The current version of the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory (MPAI-4) consists of 30 items rated on a 5-point scale and representing key indicators of limitations in ability, activities and adjustment, and community participation after acquired brain injury (ABI). Three subscales representing each of these latter domains (Ability Index, Adjustment Index, and Participation Index) may be obtained in addition to a total score. The MPAI-4 includes ratings of common comorbidities (psychotic symptoms, alcohol use, drug use, and law violations); however, these ratings do not contribute to the total score. The MPAI-4 may be completed by professional providers, by individuals with ABI, and/or by their significant others and has been translated into a number of languages including Spanish, French, Danish, Italian, Swedish, German, and Portuguese. The MPAI-4 rating scale, a manual for its use, and translated versions are available for...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References and Readings

  1. Altman, I. M., Swick, S., Parrott, D., & Malec, J. F. (2010). Effectiveness of community-based rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury (TBI) for 489 program completers compared to those precipitously discharged. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 91, 1697–1704.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Altman, I. M., Swick, S., & Malec, J. F. (2013). Effectiveness of home- and community-based rehabilitation in a large cohort of patients disabled by cerebrovascular accident: Evidence of a dose-response relationship. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 94, 1837–1841.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bellon, K., Malec, J. F., & Kolakowsky-Hayner, S. A. (2012). Mayo-Portland adaptability inventory. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 27, 314–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bohac, D. L., Malec, J. F., & Moessner, A. M. (1997). Factor analysis of the Mayo-Portland adaptability inventory: Structure and validity. Brain Injury, 11(7), 469–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bond, T. M., & Fox, C. G. (2015). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge/Taylor Francis Group.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Constantinidou, F., Thomas, R. D., Scharp, V. L., Laske, K. M., Hammerly, M. D., & Guitonde, S. (2005). Effects of categorization training in patients with TBI during postacute rehabilitation: Preliminary findings. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 20(2), 143–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eicher, V., Murphy, M. P., Murphy, T. F., & Malec, J. F. (2012). Progress assessed with the Mayo-Portland adaptability inventory in 604 participants in 4 types of post–inpatient rehabilitation brain injury programs. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 93, 100–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Harradine, P. G., Winstanley, J. B., Tate, R., Cameron, I. D., Baguley, I. J., & Harris, R. D. (2004). Severe traumatic brain injury in new South Wales: Comparable outcomes for rural and urban residents. Medical Journal of Australia, 181(3), 130–134.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Kean, J., Malec, J. F., Altman, I. M., & Swick, S. (2011). Rasch measurement analysis of the Mayo-Portland adaptability inventory (MPAI-4) in a community-based rehabilitation sample. Journal of Neurotrauma, 28, 745–775.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Kean, J., Malec, J. F., Cooper, D. B., & Bowles, A. O. (2013). Utility of the Mayo-Portland adaptability inventory-4 for self-reported outcomes in a military sample with traumatic brain injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 12, 2417–2424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lexell, J., Malec, J., & Jacobsson, L. M. (2012). Mapping the Mayo-Portland adaptability inventory to the international classification of functioning, disability and health. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 44, 65–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lezak, M. D. (1987). Relationships between personality disorders, social disturbances and physical disability following traumatic brain injury. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 2(1), 57–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Malec, J. F. (2001). Impact of comprehensive day treatment on societal participation for persons with acquired brain injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 82, 885–894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Malec, J. F. (2004a). Comparability of Mayo-Portland adaptability inventory ratings by staff, significant others and people with acquired brain injury. Brain Injury, 18(6), 563–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Malec, J. F. (2004b). The Mayo-Portland participation index (M2PI): A brief and psychometrically-sound measure of brain injury outcome. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 85, 1989–1996.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Malec, J. F., & Kean, J. (2016). Post-inpatient brain injury rehabilitation outcomes: Report from the National OutcomeInfo Database. Journal of Neurotrauma, 33, 1371–1379.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Malec, J. F., & Thompson, J. M. (1994). Relationship of the Mayo-Portland adaptability inventory to functional outcome and cognitive performance measures. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 9(4), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Malec, J. F., Machulda, M. M., & Moessner, A. M. (1997). Differing problem perceptions of staff, survivors, and significant others after brain injury. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 12(3), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Malec, J. F., Buffington, A. L. H., Moessner, A. M., & Degiorgio, L. (2000a). A medical/vocational case coordination system for persons with brain injury: An evaluation of employment outcomes. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 81, 1007–1015.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Malec, J. F., Moessner, A. M., Kragness, M., & Lezak, M. D. (2000b). Refining a measure of brain injury sequelae to predict postacute rehabilitation outcome: Rating scale analysis of the Mayo-Portland adaptability inventory (MPAI). The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 15(1), 670–682.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Malec, J. F., Kragness, M., Evans, R. W., Finlay, K. L., Kent, A., & Lezak, M. D. (2003). Further psychometric evaluation and revision of the Mayo-Portland adaptability inventory in a national sample. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 8(6), 479–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Malec, J. F., Kean, J., Altman, I. W., & Swick, S. (2012). The Mayo-Portland adaptability inventory (MPAI-4): Comparing psychometrics in cerebrovascular accident to traumatic brain injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 93, 2271–2275.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Murrey, G. J., Hale, F. M., & Williams, J. D. (2005). Assessment of anosognosia with frontal lobe damage: Clinical utility of the Mayo-Portland adaptability inventory (MPAI). Brain Injury, 19(8), 599–603.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Tate, R., Cameron, I., Winstanley, J., Myles, B., & Harris, R. (2004). Brain injury outcomes study: Final report. Sydney: University of Sydney; Australian Government Department on Health and Ageing; New South Wales Department of Health; Motor Accidents Authority of New South Wales.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationIndiana University School of Medicine and the Rehabilitation Hospital of IndianaIndianapolisUSA