Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology

2018 Edition
| Editors: Jeffrey S. Kreutzer, John DeLuca, Bruce Caplan

Assessment of Life Habits (LIFE-H)

  • Jessica FishEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57111-9_1816

Synonyms

The abbreviation LIFE-H is consistent, but version numbers are often appended (e.g., LIFE-H 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 3.1)

Description

The Assessment of Life Habits (LIFE-H) is a self-report measure of social participation of people with disabilities. The original version of the scale consisted of 298 items; later versions have reduced the number of items to 240 (version 3.0). Various short forms are also available (55–77 items), with the most recent being the 77-item version 3.1. The long form is said to take between 20 and 120 min to complete and the short form, 20–60 min. In the short form (version 3.1), items are organized into 12 categories: nutrition, fitness, personal care, communication, housing, mobility (classified as activities of regular living) and responsibilities, interpersonal relationships, community life, education, employment, and recreation (classified as social roles). The long form includes 31 subsections, essentially covering the listed domains with a greater...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References and Readings

  1. Desrosiers, J., Rochette, A., Noreau, L., Bravo, G., Hébert, R., & Boutin, C. (2003). Comparison of two functional independence scales with a participation measure in post-stroke rehabilitation. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 37(2), 157–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Desrosiers, J., Noreau, L., Rochette, A., Bravo, G., & Boutin, C. (2002). Predictors of handicap situations following post-stroke rehabilitation. Disability and Rehabilitation, 24(15), 774–785.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Figueiiredo, S., Korner-Bitensky, N., Rochette, A., & Desrosiers, J. (2010). Use of the LIFE-H in stroke rehabilitation: A structured review of its psychometric properties. Disability and Rehabilitation, 32, 705–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fougeyrollas, P., Noreau, L., Bergeron, H., Cloutier, R., Dion, S. A., & St-Michel, G. (1998). Social consequences of long term impairments and disabilities: Conceptual approach and assessment of handicap. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 21(2), 127–141.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. More information is available on http://ripph.qc.ca/en/assessment-tools/introduction/life-h. Accessed 25 Feb 2017.
  6. Noreau, L., Fougeyrollas, P., & Vincent, C. (2002). The LIFE-H: Assessment of the quality of social participation. Technology and Disability, 14(3), 113–118.Google Scholar
  7. Noreau, L., Desrosiers, J., Robichaud, L., Fougeyrollas, P., Rochette, A., & Viscogliosi, C. (2004). Measuring social participation: Reliability of the LIFE-H in older adults with disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation, 26(6), 346–352.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Rochette, A., Desrosiers, J., & Noreau, L. (2001). Association between personal and environmental factors and the occurrence of handicap situations following a stroke. Disability and Rehabilitation, 23(13), 559–569.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Medical Research Council Cognition and Brain Sciences UnitCambridgeUK