Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology

2018 Edition
| Editors: Jeffrey S. Kreutzer, John DeLuca, Bruce Caplan

Cognitive Log

  • Thomas A. NovackEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57111-9_1797

Synonyms

C-Log; Cog-Log

Description

The Cog-Log is a ten-item scale designed for serial bedside measurement of cognitive functions in individuals completing inpatient rehabilitation. The scale includes items assessing orientation, immediate and delayed verbal recall, concentration, executive function, response inhibition, and praxis. All responses are scored according to the following criteria: 3 points = spontaneously correct response, no errors; 2 points = correct on logical cueing (e.g., “That was yesterday, so today is?”) or in the presence of 1 error; 1 point = correct on multiple-choice cueing or in the presence of 2 errors; and 0 points = incorrect despite cueing, more than 2 errors, unable to complete. Points for time estimation are calculated as follows: 3 points = correct within ±5 s; 2 points = correct within ±10 s; and 1 point = correct within ±15 s. Incorrect/absent responses are followed by cueing at the next level for the orientation and delayed memory items....

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References and Readings

  1. Alderson, A. L., & Novack, T. A. (2003). Reliable serial measurement of cognitive processes in rehabilitation: The cognitive-log. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 84, 668–672.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Center on Outcome Measurement in Brain Injury (COMBI). www.tbims.org/combi. Accessed 26 May 2009.
  3. Lee, D., LoGalbo, A. P., Baños, J. H., & Novack, T. A. (2004). Prediction of cognitive abilities one year following TBI based on cognitive screening during rehabilitation. Rehabilitation Psychology, 49, 167–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Penna, S., & Novack, T. (2007). Further validation of the orientation and cognitive log relative to the mini mental status exam. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 88, 1360–1361.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamBirminghamUSA