Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology

2018 Edition
| Editors: Jeffrey S. Kreutzer, John DeLuca, Bruce Caplan

Reliable Change Index

  • Grant L. IversonEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57111-9_1242

Definition

Jacobson and Truax (1991) proposed a psychometric method for determining if a change on a psychological test is reliable. That is, does the change represent a real improvement or deterioration in the patient’s clinical condition – or does it simply reflect measurement error? This method involved the calculation of a “reliable change index” (RCI). The original formula used by Jacobson and Truax has been debated, and modified several times, over the years (Hageman and Arrindell 1993, 1999a, b; Hsu 1989, 1999; Speer 1992; Speer and Greenbaum 1995). The reliable change “index” is the derived score from this formula, and it is expressed as a z-score. As such, RCI scores are associated with confidence intervals (CI) for measurement error surrounding test-retest difference scores (e.g., z = 1.28, 0.80 CI; z = 1.64, 0.90 CI; and z= 1.96 = 0.95 CI). The original formula for calculating the RCI is not provided here, because it has been modified several times and because it yields a...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References and Readings

  1. Barr, W. B., & McCrea, M. (2001). Sensitivity and specificity of standardized neurocognitive testing immediately following sports concussion. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 7(6), 693–702.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Brooks, B. L., Sherman, E. M. S., Iverson, G. L., Slick, D. J., & Strauss, E. (in press). Psychometric foundations for the interpretation of neuropsychological test results. In M. R. Schoenberg & J. G. Scott (Eds.), The black book of neuropsychology: A syndrome-based approach.Google Scholar
  3. Chelune, G. J. (2003). Assessing reliable neuropsychological change. In R. D. Franklin (Ed.), Prediction in forensic and neuropsychology: Sound statistical practices (pp. 65–88). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  4. Chelune, G. J., Naugle, R. I., Luders, H., Sedlak, J., & Awad, I. A. (1993). Individual change after epilepsy surgery: Practice effects and base-rate information. Neuropsychology, 7, 41–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hageman, W. J., & Arrindell, W. A. (1993). A further refinement of the reliable change (RC) index by improving the pre-post difference score: Introducing RCID. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 31(7), 693–700.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Hageman, W. J., & Arrindell, W. A. (1999a). Clinically significant and practical! Enhancing precision does make a difference. Reply to McGlinchey and Jacobson, Hsu, and Speer. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 37(12), 1219–1233.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Hageman, W. J., & Arrindell, W. A. (1999b). Establishing clinically significant change: Increment of precision and the distinction between individual and group level of analysis. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 37(12), 1169–1193.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Heaton, R. K., Temkin, N. R., Dikmen, S. S., Avitable, N., Taylor, M. J., Marcotte, T. D., et al. (2001). Detecting change: A comparison of three neuropsychological methods using normal and clinical samples. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 16, 75–91.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Hinton-Bayre, A. D., Geffen, G. M., Geffen, L. B., McFarland, K. A., & Friis, P. (1999). Concussion in contact sports: Reliable change indices of impairment and recovery. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 21(1), 70–86.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Hsu, L. M. (1989). Reliable changes on psychotherapy: Taking into account regression toward the mean. Behavioral Assessment, 11, 459–467.Google Scholar
  11. Hsu, L. M. (1999). A comparison of three methods of identifying reliable and clinically significant client changes: Commentary on Hageman and Arrindell. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 37, 1195–1202.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Iverson, G. L. (1998). Interpretation of Mini-Mental State Examination scores in community-dwelling elderly and geriatric neuropsychiatry patients. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 13(10), 661–666.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Iverson, G. L. (2001). Interpreting change on the WAIS-III/WMS-III in clinical samples. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 16, 183–191.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Iverson, G. L., & Green, P. (2001). Measuring improvement or decline on the WAIS-R in inpatient psychiatry. Psychological Reports, 89(2), 457–462.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Iverson, G. L., Lovell, M. R., & Collins, M. W. (2003). Interpreting change on ImPACT following sport concussion. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 17(4), 460–467.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Jacobson, N. S., & Truax, P. (1991). Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59(1), 12–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jacobson, N. S., Roberts, L. J., Berns, S. B., & McGlinchey, J. B. (1999). Methods for defining and determining the clinical significance of treatment effects: Description, application, and alternatives. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67(3), 300–307.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Ogles, B. M., Lambert, M. J., & Masters, K. S. (1996). Assessing outcome in clinical practice. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  19. Speer, D. C. (1992). Clinically significant change: Jacobson and Truax (1991) revisited. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60(3), 402–408.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Speer, D. C., & Greenbaum, P. E. (1995). Five methods for computing significant individual client change and improvement rates: Support for an individual growth curve approach. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63(6), 1044–1048.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Temkin, N. R., Heaton, R. K., Grant, I., & Dikmen, S. S. (1999). Detecting significant change in neuropsychological test performance: A comparison of four models. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 5(4), 357–369.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Wechsler, D., Holdnack, J. A., & Drozdick, L. W. (2009). Wechsler Memory Scale – Fourth Edition, technical and interpretive manual. San Antonio: NCS Pearson.Google Scholar
  23. White, T., & Stern, R. A. (2003). Neuropsychological assessment battery: Psychometric and technical manual. Lutz: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychiatryBritish Columbia Mental Health and Addictions, University of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada