Skip to main content

Alternate Test Forms

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 37 Accesses

Synonyms

Equivalent forms; Parallel forms

Definition

Alternate test forms are designed to avoid or reduce content- or item-specific practice effects that are associated with repeated administrations of the same neuropsychological test(s) (Fastenau et al. 2002). Examination of the manuals for many intellectual and neuropsychological tests illustrates that practice effects are common, especially over brief retest intervals (e.g., days or weeks). Regarding test construction, alternate test forms should include the same number of items, and the items should be of equivalent difficulty. Moreover, the test instructions, time limits, examples, and format should be identical to the original instrument developed during standardization, to reduce measurement error (Jackson 2009). Of course, measurement error can never be eliminated. For example, content-sampling error and time-sampling error – inherent in all test-retest paradigms – are always concerns in developing alternate test forms...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   899.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   1,099.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References and Readings

  • Benedict, R. H. B. (2001). Brief visuospatial memory test – Revised. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, J., & Benedict, R. H. B. (2001). Hopkins verbal learning test-revised. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busch, R. M., Chelune, G. J., & Suchy, Y. (2006). Using norms in neuropsychological assessment. In D. K. Attix & K. A. Welsh-Bohmer (Eds.), Geriatric neuropsychology: Assessment and intervention (pp. 133–157). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorans, N. J., & Holland, P. W. (2000). Population invariance and equitability of tests: Basic theory and the linear case. Journal of Educational Measurement, 37, 281–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fastenau, P. S., Hankins, W. T., McGinnis, C. M., Moy, T., & Richard, M. (2002). Effects of alternate forms on retest effects in clinical testing. Journal of International Neuropsychological Society, 7(2), 151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, S. L. (2009). Research methods and statistics: A critical thinking approach (3rd ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolen, M. J., & Brennan, R. L. (2004). Test equating, scaling, and linking: Methods and practices (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ormea, D., Reeb, M. J., & Riouxc, P. (2001). Premorbid IQ estimates from a multiple aptitude test battery: Regression vs. equating. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 16, 679–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, N. S. (2008). A discussion of population invariance of equating. Applied Psychological Measurement, 32, 98–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, N. S., Kolen, M. J., & Hoover, H. D. (1989). Scaling, norming, and equating. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 221–262). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salinsky, M. C., Storzbach, D., Dodrill, C. B., & Binder, L. M. (2001). Test-retest bias, reliability, and regression equations for neuropsychological measures repeated over a 12–16-week period. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 7(5), 597–605.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sattler, J. M. (2001). Assessment of children: Cognitive applications (4th ed.). San Diego: Jerome M. Sattler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, R. A., & White, T. (2003). Neuropsychological assessment battery. Lutz: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, E., Sherman, E. M. S., & Spreen, O. (2006). A compendium of neuropsychological tests: Administration, norms, and commentary (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, T., & Stern, R. A. (2003). Neuropsychological assessment battery: Psychometric and technical manual. Lutz: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, G. S., & Robertson, G. J. (2006). Wide range achievement test (4th ed.). Lutz: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Grant L. Iverson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Iverson, G.L., Ferguson, K.E. (2018). Alternate Test Forms. In: Kreutzer, J.S., DeLuca, J., Caplan, B. (eds) Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57111-9_1170

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics