Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology

Living Edition
| Editors: Jeffrey Kreutzer, John DeLuca, Bruce Caplan

Brainstem Auditory Evoked Responses

  • Flora HammondEmail author
  • Sheryl Katta-Charles
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56782-2_7-3



Brainstem auditory evoked responses (BAER) test the function of the auditory nerve and auditory pathways of the brain by measuring the electrophysiologic responses to repeated clicks presented to each ear. The response time of electrical waves generated from different anatomical parts of the brain-ear system are plotted as summarized below (Lew et al. 2007):
  • Wave I: Cochlear nerve (CN VIII)

  • Wave II: Cochlear nucleus (CN VIII)

  • Wave III: Superior olivary complex

  • Wave IV: Lateral lemniscus

  • Wave V: Inferior colliculus

Waveform morphology and interwave differences are compared to healthy controls to establish abnormality in function along the auditory pathway. Unilateral delays suggest a lesion to cranial nerve VIII along its pathway or in the brainstem. BAER may be abnormal in acoustic...


Multiple Sclerosis Inferior Colliculus Auditory Brainstem Response Auditory Pathway Acoustic Neuroma 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References and Readings

  1. Huszar, L. (2006). Clinical utility of evoked potentials. eMedicine. Retrieved 9 July 2007 from http://www.emedicine.com/neuro/topic69.htm. Accessed 23 Mar 2017.
  2. Lew, H. L., Lee, E. H., Pan, S. S. L., & Chiang, J. Y. P. (2007). Electrophysiologic assessment techniques: Evoked potentials and electroencephalography. In N. D. Zasler, D. I. Katz, & R. D. Zafonte (Eds.), Brain injury medicine (p. 158). New York: Demos.Google Scholar
  3. Lew, H. L., Tanaka, C., Hirohata, E., & Goodrich, G. L. (2016). Auditory, vestibular and visual impairments. In D. X. Cifu (Ed.), Physical medicine and rehabilitation (pp. 1137–1161). Philadelphia: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  4. Luauté, J., Fischer, C., Adeleine, P., Morlet, D., Tell, L., & Boisson, D. (2005). Late auditory and event-related potentials can be useful to predict good functional outcome after coma. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 86, 917–923.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Luaute, J., Maucort-Boulch, D., Tell, L., Quelard, F., Sarraf, T., Iwaz, J., Boisson, D., & Fischer, C. (2010). Long-term outcomes of chronic minimally conscious and vegetative states. Neurology, 75, 246–252.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Vernet, M., Bashir, S., Enam, S. F., Kumru, H., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2012). Electrophysiologic techniques. In N. D. Zasler, D. I. Katz, & R. D. Zafonte (Eds.), Brain injury medicine (pp. 236–238). New York: Demos.Google Scholar
  7. Zafonte, R. D., Hammond, F. M., & Peterson, J. (1996). Predicting outcome in the slow to respond traumatically brain-injured patient: Acute and subacute parameters. NeuroRehabilitation, 6, 19–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationIndiana University School of MedicineIndianapolisUSA