Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC)
Augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) is a set of procedures and processes by which an individual’s communication skills can be maximized for functional and effective communication. AAC approaches supplement or replace natural speech with aided options that incorporate the use of some type of device ranging from simple picture communication systems to complex speech generating devices and/or unaided options that involve only the individual’s body, such as sign language. AAC may be used to augment understanding as well as written or oral expression. A “multimodal” approach that includes both devices and unaided strategies may be most effective in meeting the individual’s communication needs.
Prior to about 1970, AAC was not a widely accepted intervention technique and could even be described as contraindicated in the professional literature. At that time, it was thought that the act of vocal production was a critical building block of human...
References and Reading
- AAC-RERC. (2011). Mobile devices and communication apps: An RERC white paper. Downloaded from http://aac-rerc.psu.edu/index.php/pages/show/id/46
- American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2004). Preferred practice patterns for the profession of speech-language pathology [Preferred Practice Patterns]. Available from www.asha.org/policy.
- American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Augmentative and alternative communication decisions. Downloaded 2. 23. 2018.Google Scholar
- Bates, E. (1976). Language and context: The acquisition of pragmatics. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
- Beukelman, D., & Mirenda, P. (2013). Augmentative & alternative communication: Supporting children& adults with complex communication needs (4th ed.). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Company.Google Scholar
- Beukleman, D., Garrett, K., & Yorkston, K. (2007). Augmentative and alternative communication strategies for adults with acute or chronic medical conditions. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Company.Google Scholar
- Brady, N. C., Bruce, S., Goldman, A., Erickson, K., Mineo, B., Ogletree, B. T., Paul, D., Romski, M., Sevcik, R., Siegel, E., Schoonover, J., Snell, M., Sylvester, L., & Wilkinson, K. (2016). Communication services and supports for individuals with severe disabilities: Guidance for assessment and intervention. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 121(2), 121–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. (2015). National coverage determination of speech generating devices. Available from https://www.cms.gov/medicare-coverage-database/details/medicare-coverage-document-details.aspx?MCDId=26&mcdtypename=National+Benefit+Category+Analyses&MCDIndexType=3&bc=AgAEAAAAAAAAAA%3d%3d&#finalGoogle Scholar
- Fourcin, A. J. (1975). Language development in the absence of expressive speech. In E. H. Lenneberg & E. Lenneberg (Eds.), Foundations of language development (Vol. II). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
- Fried-Oken, M., & Bersani, H. (2000). Speaking up and spelling it out: Personal essays on augmentative and alternative communication. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Company.Google Scholar
- Glennen, S. L., & DeCoste, D. C. (1997). Handbook of augmentative and alternative communication. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group.Google Scholar
- Schlosser, R. W. (2003). The efficacy of augmentative and alternative communication: Toward evidence-based practice. San Diego: Academic.Google Scholar
- Silverman, F. (1980). Communication for the speechless. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Vanderheiden, G. C. (1978). Non-vocal communication resource book. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
- Vanderheiden, G. C., & Grilley, K. (1976). Non-vocal communication techniques and aids for the severely physically handicapped. Austin: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar