Advertisement

Hemorrhoids pp 279-295 | Cite as

Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy: Techniques and Results

  • María del Mar Aguilar Martínez
  • Pedro Moya
  • Antonio Arroyo
Reference work entry
Part of the Coloproctology book series (COLOPROCT, volume 2)

Abstract

Hemorrhoidal disease is one of the most frequent reasons for consultation found in the daily clinical practice of the colorectal surgeon. The clinical manifestation that most frequently forces the patient to consult is the rectal bleeding, and the diagnosis is performed by physical examination. The different treatment options are indicated according to the degree of hemorrhoidal prolapse.

There are many therapeutic options, ranging from conservative measures to invasive techniques. Among the surgical techniques, the most used techniques are those based on hemorrhoidectomy. However, in the 1990s, the technique of Longo or hemorrhoidopexy was described, based on the fact that correcting the anatomical situation of prolapsed hemorrhoidal plexus would be the ideal treatment for hemorrhoidal disease and not the radical excision of the plexus as had been done since ancient times.

The advantages of this procedure initially seemed clear: less postoperative pain, shorter hospital stay, less time to social reinsertion, among others. But with the development and implementation of the procedure, have appeared some problems and reviews that do not currently be implemented by all professionals.

The experience of our group with the technique of Longo is about 14 years and the results obtained are good. It can be affirmed that, with a good indication and performed by expert hands, it is an available technique for the treatment of hemorrhoidal pathology.

References

  1. Arroyo A, Pérez-Vicente F, Serrano P, Candela F, Pérez-Vázquez M, Calpena R (2006a) Proctitis complicating stapled hemorrhoidectomy: report of a case. Int J Color Dis 21:197–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arroyo A, Pérez-Vicente F, Miranda E, Sánchez A, Serrano P, Candela F, Oliver I, Calpena R (2006b) Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing two different circular staplers for mucosectomy in the treatment of hemorrhoids. World J Surg 30:1305–1310CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Arroyo A, Pérez-Legaz J, Miranda E, Moya P, Ruíz-Tovar J, Lacueva F, Candela F, Calpena R (2011) Long-term clinical results of double-pursestring stapled hemorrhoidopexy in a selected group of patients for the treatment of chronic hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum 54(5):609–614CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Jong-Sun K, Yogesh K, Thieltges S, Zehler O, Gawad K, Yekebas E, Izbicki J, Kutup A (2013) Stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy in circumferential third-degree hemorrhoids: long-term results of a randomized controlled trial. J Gastrointest Surg 17:1292–1298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Leardi S, Pessia B, Mascio M, Piccione F, Schietroma M, Pietroletti R (2016) Doppler-guided transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization (DG-THD) versus stapled hemorrhoidopexy (SH) in the treatment of third-degree hemorrhoids: clinical results at short and long-term follow-up. J Gastrointest Surg 20:1886–1890CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Lee KC, Chen HH, Chung KC, Hu WH, Chang CL, Lin SE, Tsai KL, Lu CC (2013) Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing outcomes for stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy for symptomatic hemorrhoids in adults. Int J Surg 11(9):914–918CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Lucarelli P, Picchio M, Caporossi M, De Angelis F, Di Filippo A, Stipa F, Spaziani E (2013) Transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialisation with mucopexy versus stapler haemorrhoidopexy: a randomised trial with long-term follow-up. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 95:246–251CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Ortiz H (2007) Stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy. Ann Surg 245(1):155–156CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Pérez-Vicente F, Arroyo A, Serrano P, Candela F, Sánchez A, Calpena R (2006) Prospective randomised clinical trial of single versus double purse-string stapled mucosectomy in the treatment of prolapsed haemorrhoids. Int J Color Dis 21(1):38–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Porret L, Porret J, Ho Y (2015) Documented complications of staple hemorrhoidopexy: a systematic review. Int Surg 100:44–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Sultan S (2015) Longo procedure (Stapled hemorrhoidopexy): indications, results. J Visc Surg 152:511–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Yang J, Cui P, Han H, Tong D (2013) Meta-analysis of stapled hemorrhoidopexy vs LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy. World J Gastroenterol 719(29):4799–4807CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • María del Mar Aguilar Martínez
    • 1
  • Pedro Moya
    • 1
  • Antonio Arroyo
    • 1
  1. 1.Servicio de Cirugía General y del Aparato DigestivoHospital General Universitario de ElcheElche, AlicanteSpain

Personalised recommendations