Advertisement

Hemorrhoids pp 223-233 | Cite as

Pros and Contras of Hemorrhoidectomy

  • Luigi Brusciano
  • Antonino Esposito
  • Ludovico Docimo
Reference work entry
Part of the Coloproctology book series (COLOPROCT, volume 2)

Abstract

One of the trickiest decisions, when conservative procedures in the treatment of hemorrhoids fail, is represented by the selection of which kind of surgical approach should be performed in a patient with a determinate clinical presentation of hemorrhoids, and why and where some strategies should be chosen or avoided. The most important aspect remains the communication and the match with patient’s expectations and needs, and not least the ability, availability of devices, and confidence of the surgeon who is approaching to treat hemorrhoids with a determinate technique.

References

  1. Abbasakoor F, Nelson M, Beynon J, Patel B, Carr ND (1998) Anal endosonography in patients with anorectal symptoms after haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 85(11):1522–1524CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Arslani N, Patrlj L, Rajković Z, Papeš D, Altarac S (2012) A randomized clinical trial comparing Ligasure versus stapled hemorrhoidectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 22:58–61.  https://doi.org/10.1097/ SLE.0b013e318247d966CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Basdanis G, Papadopoulos VN, Michalopoulos A, Apostolidis S, Harlaftis N (2005) Randomized clinical trial of stapled hemorrhoidectomy vs open with Ligasure for prolapsed piles. Surg Endosc. 19(2):235–9. Epub 2004 Dec 2CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Boccasanta P, Capretti PG, Venturi M et al (2001) Randomised controlled trial between stapled circumferential mucosectomy and conventional circular hemorrhoidectomy in advanced hemorrhoids with external mucosal prolapse. Am J Surg 182(1):64–68CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Brisinda G, Vanella S, Cadeddu F, Marniga G, Mazzeo P, Brandara F, Maria G (2009) Surgical treatment of anal stenosis. World J Gastroenterol 15(16):1921–1928CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Brusciano L, Ayabaca SM, Pescatori M, Accarpio GM, Dodi G, Cavallari F, Ravo B, Annibali R (2004) Reinterventions after complicated or failed stapled hemorrhoidopexy. Dis Colon Rectum 47(11):1846–1851CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Brusciano L, Limongelli P, Tolone S, del Genio GM, Martellucci J, Docimo G, Lucido F, Docimo L (2015) Technical Aspect of Stapled Transanal Rectal Resection. From PPH-01 to Contour to Both: An Optional Combined Approach to Treat Obstructed Defecation? Dis Colon Rectum. 58(8):817–20.  https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000000381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cataldo P, Ellis CN, Gregorcyk S, Hyman N, Buie WD, Church J, Cohen J, Fleshner P, Kilkenny J, Ko C, Levien D, Nelson R, Newstead G, Orsay C, Perry WB, Rakinic J, Shellito P, Strong S, Ternent C, Tjandra J, Whiteford M (2005) Practice parameters for the management of hemorrhoids (revised). Dis Colon Rectum 48:189–194.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-0921-4CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Cerato MM et al (2014) Surgical treatment of hemorrhoids: a critical appraisal of the current options. Arq Bras Cir Dig 27(1):66–70CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Cheetham MJ, Cohen CR, Kamm MA, Phillips RK (2003) A randomized, controlled trial of diathermy hemorrhoidectomy vs. stapled hemorrhoidectomy in an intended day-care setting with longer-term follow-up. Dis Colon Rectum 46(4):491–497CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen HL, Woo XB, Cui J, Chen CQ, Peng JS (2014) Ligasure versus stapled hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of hemorrhoids: a meta-analysis of randomized control trials. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 24(4):285–9.  https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000000009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cirocco WC (2008) Life threatening sepsis and mortality following stapled hemorrhoidopexy. Surgery 143:824–829.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2007.10.004CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Cohen Z (1985) Symposium on outpatient anorectal procedures. Alternatives to surgical hemorrhoidectomy. Can J Surg 28:230–231PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Correa-Rovelo JM, Tellez O, Obregón L, Duque-López X, Miranda-Gómez A, Pichardo-Bahena R, Mendez M, Moran S (2003) Prospective study of factors affecting postoperative pain and symptom persistence after stapled rectal mucosectomy for hemorrhoids: a need for preservation of squamous epithelium. Dis Colon Rectum 46:955–962.  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.dcr.0000074728.77120.43CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. De Nardi P, Capretti G, Corsaro A, Staudacher C (2014) A prospective, randomized trial comparing the short and long-term results of doppler-guided transanal hemorrhoid dearterialization with mucopexy versus excision hemorrhoidectomy for grade III hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum 57(3):348–353CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Dennison AR, Whiston RJ, Rooney S, Morris DL (1989) The management of hemorrhoids. Am J Gastroenterol 84(5):475–481PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Denoya PI, Fakhoury M, Chang K, Fakhoury J, Bergamaschi R (2013) Dearterialization with mucopexy versus haemorrhoidectomy for grade III or IV haemorrhoids: short term results of a randomized controlled trial. Color Dis 15(10):1281–1288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ferguson JA, Heaton JR (1959) Closed hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 2:176–179CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Giordano P, Overton J, Madeddu F, Zaman S, Gravante G (2009a) Transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization: a systematic review. Dis Colon Rectum 52(9):1665–1671CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Giordano P, Gravante G, Sorge R, Ovens L, Nastro P (2009b) Long-term outcomes of stapled hemorrhoidopexy vs conventional hemorrhoidectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Surg 144(3):266–272CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. He P, Chen H (2015) Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids with Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of prolapsed hemorrhoids. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi 18(12):1224–1230PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Hetzer FH, Demartines N, Handschin AE, Clavien PA (2002) Stapled vs excision hemorrhoidectomy: long-term results of a prospective randomized trial. Arch Surg 137(3):337–340CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Johannsson HO, Pahlman L, Graf W (2013) Functional and structural abnormalities after Milligan hemorrhoidectomy: a comparison with healthy subjects. Dis Colon Rectum 56:903–906CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Jr BL, Knoepp LF Jr, Erdman LH, Alia RT (1985) Management of hemorrhoidal disease. J S C Med Assoc 81:398–401Google Scholar
  25. Kraemer M, Parulava T, Roblick M, Duschka L, Müller-Lobeck H (2005) Prospective, randomized study: proximate PPH stapler vs. LigaSure for hemorrhoidal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 48(8):1517–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Li YD, JH X, Lin JJ, Zhu WF (2012) Excisional hemorrhoidal surgery and its effect on anal continence. World J Gastroenterol 18(30):4059–4063CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Longo A 1998 Treatment of hemorrhoidal disease by reduction of mucosa and haemorrhoidal prolapse with a circular stapling device: a new procedure. In: 6th World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery. pp 777–784Google Scholar
  28. Lumb KJ, Colquhoun PHD, Malthaner R, Jayaraman S (2010) Stapled versus conventional surgery for hemorrhoids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 18(4):CD005393Google Scholar
  29. MacRae HM, Temple LK, McLeod RS (2002) A meta-analysis of hemorrhoidal treatments. Semin C R Surg 13:77–83Google Scholar
  30. Madiba TES et al. Procedure for prolapsed haemorrhoids versus excisional haemorrhoidectomy – a systematic review and meta-analysis. Afr med J. 2009 99(1):43–53Google Scholar
  31. Maw A, KW E, Seow-Choen F (2002) Retroperitoneal sepsis complicating stapled hemorrhoidectomy: report of a case and review of the literature. Dis Colon Rectum 45(6):826–828CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. McConnell JC, Khubchandani IT (1983) Long-term follow-up of closed hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 26(12):797–799CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Milligan ETC, Naunton Morgan C, Jones L, Officer R (1937) Surgical anatomy of the anal canal, and the operative treatment of hemorrhoids. Lancet 230:1119–1124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Molloy RG, Kingsmore D (2000) Life threatening pelvic sepsis after stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Lancet 355(9206):810CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Naldini G (2011) Serious unconventional complications of surgery with stapler for haemorrhoidal prolapse and obstructed defaecation because of rectocoele and rectal intussusception. Color Dis 13(3):323–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Palimento D, Picchio M, Attanasio U, Lombardi A, Bambini C, Renda A (2003) Stapled and open hemorrhoidectomy: randomized controlled trial of early results. World J Surg 27(2):203–207PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Pessaux P, Lermite E, Tuech JJ, Brehant O, Regenet N, Arnaud JP (2004) Pelvic sepsis after stapled hemorrhoidectomy. J Am Coll Surg 199(5):824–825CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Racalbuto A, Aliotta I, Corsaro G, Lanteri R, Di Cataldo A, Licata A (2004) Hemorrhoidal stapler prolapsectomy vs. Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy: a long-term randomized trial. Int J Color Dis 19(3):239–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ratto C (2014) THD Doppler procedure for hemorrhoids: the surgical technique. Tech Coloproctol 18(3):291–298CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Ripetti V, Caricato M, Arullani A (2002) Rectal perforation, retropneumoperitoneum, and pneumomediastinum after stapling procedure for prolapsed hemorrhoids: report of a case and subsequent considerations. Dis Colon Rectum 45(2):268–270CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Rowsell M, Bello M, Hemingway DM (2000) Circumferential mucosectomy (stapled haemorrhoidectomy) versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 355:779–781CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Sakr MF, Moussa MM (2010) LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy versus stapled hemorrhoidopexy: a prospective, randomizedclinical trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 53(8):1161–7.  https://doi.org/10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181e1a1e9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Shalaby R, Desoky A (2001) Randomized clinical trial of stapled versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 88(8):1049–1053CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Simillis C et al (2015) Systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing clinical outcomes and effectiveness of surgical treatments for haemorrhoids. Br J Surg 102(13):1603–1618CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Thomson H (1979) The anal cushions – a fresh concept in diagnosis. Postgrad Med J 55(644):403–405CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Van de Stadt J, D’Hoore A, Duinslaeger M, Chasse E, Penninckx F, Belgian Section of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Belgian Society for Surgery (2005) Long-term results after excision haemorrhoidectomy versus stapled haemorrhoidopexy for prolapsing haemorrhoids; a Belgian prospective randomized trial. Acta Chir Belg 105(1):44–52PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. van Tets WF, Kuijpers JH, Tran K, Mollen R, van Goor H (1997) Influence of parks’ anal retractor on anal sphincter pressures. Dis Colon Rectum 40(9):1042–1045CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Wang GQ et al (2013) A meta-analysis on short and long term efficacy and safety of procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi 51(11):1034–1038PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Wong LY, Jiang JK, Chang SC, Lin JK (2003) Rectal perforation: a life-threatening complication of stapled hemorrhoidectomy: report of a case. Dis Colon Rectum 46(1):116–117CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Yang J, Cui PJ, Han HZ, Tong DN (2013) Meta-analysis of stapled hemorrhoidopexy vs LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy. World J Gastroenterol 19(29):4799–4807.  https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i29.4799CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luigi Brusciano
    • 1
  • Antonino Esposito
    • 1
  • Ludovico Docimo
    • 1
  1. 1.XI Divisione di Chirurgia Generale e dell’ObesitàUniversità degli Studi della Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”CasertaItaly

Personalised recommendations