Encyclopedia of Wildfires and Wildland-Urban Interface (WUI) Fires

Living Edition
| Editors: Samuel L. Manzello

In Situ Diagnostics for Characterization of Mass and Energy Transport

  • B. W. ButlerEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51727-8_80-1

Synonyms

Definition

In situ diagnostics in the context of wildland fire implies tools, methods, and sensors designed to characterize the physical properties of the fire and surrounding environment. It is not limited to just flames but also the flora and fauna involved in the fire environment.

Introduction

Mass and energy transport play complementary roles in wildland fire intensity and spread, yet our understanding of these phenomena in the context of wildland fire remains limited (Anderson 1969; Yedinak et al. 2006; Anderson et al. 2009). In order to understand and accurately predict the behavior of forest fires (Albini 1996), model fire emissions (Wooster et al. 2005; Freeborn et al. 2008), and improve public and wildland firefighter safety (Butler and Cohen 1998), it is critical to understand how mass and energy are transported in a burning wildland fire. Wildland fire researchers have recognized the benefit of in situ measurements of fire intensity and behavior as...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Albini FA (1996) Iterative solution of the radiation transport equations governing spread of fire in wildland fuel. Combust Explosion Shock Waves 32:534–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson HE (1969) Heat transfer and fire spread. USDA Forest Serv Res Pap INT 69:1–20Google Scholar
  3. Anderson WR, Catchpole EA, Butler BW (2009) Measuring and modeling convective heat transfer in front of a spreading fire. Int J Wildland Fire. In reviewGoogle Scholar
  4. Barrows JS (1951a) Fire behavior in northern Rocky Mountain forests, vol 29. USDA, Forest Service, MissoulaGoogle Scholar
  5. Barrows JS (1951b) Forest fires in the northern Rocky Mountains, vol 28. USDA, Forest Service, MissoulaGoogle Scholar
  6. Butler BW, Cohen JD (1998) Firefighter safety zones: a theoretical model based on radiative heating. Int J Wildland Fire 8:73–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Butler BW (1993) Experimental measurements of radiant heat fluxes from simulated wildfire flames. In '12th International Conference of Fire and Forest Meteorology, Oct. 26-28, Jekyll Island, Gerogia', Oct. 26-28, 1993. (Eds JM Saveland, J Cohen) Volume 1 pp. 104-111. (Society of American Foresters, Bethesda, MD)Google Scholar
  8. Butler BW, Putnam T (2001) Fire shelter performance in simulated wildfires: an exploratory study. Int J Wildland Fire 10:29–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Butler B, Finney M, Andrews P, Albini FA (2004) A radiation-driven model for crown fire spread. Can J For Res 34:1588–1599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Catchpole WR, Catchpole EA, Butler BW, Rothermel RC, Morris GA, Latham DJ (1998) Rate of spread of free-burning fires in Woody fuels in a wind tunnel. Combust Sci Technol 131:1–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cheney NP, Gould JS, Catchpole WR (1993) The influence of fuel, weather and fire shape variables on fire-spread in grasslands. Int J Wildland Fire 3:31–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fons WL (1946) Analysis of fire spread in light forest fuels. J Agric Res 72:93–121Google Scholar
  13. Freeborn PH, Wooster MJ, Hao WM, Ryan CA, Nordgren BL, Baker SP, Ichoku C (2008) Relationships between energy release, fuel mass loss, and trace gas and aerosol emissions during laboratory biomass fires. J Geophys Res 113:17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jimenez D, Forthofer JM, Reardon JJ, Butler BW (2007) Fire Behavior sensor package remote trigger design. In: Butler BW, Cook W (eds) The fire environment-innovations, management, and policy, Destin, 26–30 Mar 2007, vol RMRS-P-46CD. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, p 662Google Scholar
  15. McCaffrey BJ, Heskestad G (1976) A robust bidirectional low-velocity probe for flame and fire application. Combust Flame 26:125–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pitts WM, Braun E, Peacock RD, Mitler HE, Johnsson EL, Reneke PA, Blevins LG (1999) Temperature uncertainties for bare-bead and aspirated thermocouple measurements in fire environments. In: Beall KA (ed) Joint Meeting, Combustion Institute, Annual conference on fire research. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, 2–5 Nov 1998. Combustion Institute, pp 508–5111Google Scholar
  17. Rothermel RC (1972) A mathematical model for predicting fire spread in wildland fuels, vol INT-115. USDA, Forest Service, OgdenGoogle Scholar
  18. Stocks BJ, Alexander ME, Lanoville RA (2004) Overview of the international crown fire modelling experiment (ICFME). Can J For Res 34:1543–1547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wooster MJ, Roberts G, Perry GLW, Kaufman YJ (2005) Retrieval of biomass combustion rates and totals from fire radiative power observations: FRP derivation and calibration relationships between biomass consumption and fire radiative energy release. J Geophys Res 110(24)Google Scholar
  20. Yedinak KM, Forthofer JM, Cohen JD, Finney MA (2006) Analysis of the profile of an open flame from a vertical fuel source. For Ecol Manag 234:S89–S89CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.US Forest Service, Missoula Fire Science LaboratoryMissoulaUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Michael Gollner
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Fire Protection EngineeringUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkUSA