Encyclopedia of Wildfires and Wildland-Urban Interface (WUI) Fires

Living Edition
| Editors: Samuel L. Manzello

Firebrands and Embers

  • Vytenis Babrauskas
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51727-8_3-1

Synonyms

Definitions

Both wildland and structure fires can generate burning particles which flow along with the gaseous combustion products. When such particles have the capability of setting additional fires (“spot fires”), they become firebrands. Firebrands and embers are similar items but with a slight distinction. “Ember” refers to any small, hot, carbonaceous particle. Meanwhile, “firebrand” specifically denotes an object which is airborne and carried for some distance in an airstream. Thus, aerodynamic properties of firebrands become an important characteristic that needs to be considered. Firebrands are also sometimes referred to as “flying brands” or “brands,” and all of these terms have the same meaning. Since firebrands or embers can be burning (flaming or smoldering), they can serve as ignition sources for vegetation, structures, or other target fuels (Fig. 1).

Introduction

The basic aerodynamics is that the firebrand first gets lofted by the plume of...
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Albini FA (1983a) Potential spotting distance from wind-driven surface fires (Res pap INT-309). Intermountain Forest and Range Exp Sta, US Forest Service, OgdenGoogle Scholar
  2. Albini FA (1983b) Transport of firebrands by line thermals. Combust Sci Tech 32:277–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Albini FA et al (2012) A mathematical model for predicting the maximum potential spotting distance from an active crown fire. Int J Wildland Fire 21:609–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anon (1910) NFPA Proc 14th Ann Mtg 14:45–52Google Scholar
  5. Anthenien RA et al (2006) On the trajectories of embers initially elevated or lofted by small scale ground fire plumes in high winds. Fire Saf J 41:349–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. ASTM (2014) Standard test method for evaluating the ability of exterior vents to resist the entry of embers and direct flame impingement. ASTM E2886/E2886MGoogle Scholar
  7. ASTM (2016) Standard test methods for fire tests of roof coverings. ASTM E108Google Scholar
  8. Babrauskas V (2003) Ignition handbook. Fire Science Publishers/Soc Fire Prot Eng, IssaquahGoogle Scholar
  9. Babrauskas V (2018) Engineering guidance for smoldering fires. J Fire Invest Res Eng, to be publishedGoogle Scholar
  10. Baroudi D et al (2017) A thermomechanical explanation for the topology of crack patterns observed on the surface of charred wood and particle fibreboard. Comb Flame 182:206–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Barrow GJ (1945) A survey of houses affected in the Beaumaris fire, January 14, 1944. J Counc Sci Ind Res 18:27. FebGoogle Scholar
  12. Bernardi GC (1974) Fires caused by equipment used during critical fire weather in California, 1962–1971. (Research Note PSW-289). Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, US Forest Service, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  13. Blackmarr WH (1972) Moisture content influences variability of slash pine litter (Res Note SE-173). Southeast Exp Sta, AshvilleGoogle Scholar
  14. Blanchi R, Leonard J (2005) Investigation of bushfire attack mechanisms resulting in house loss in the ACT Bushfire 2003. Bushfire CRC reportGoogle Scholar
  15. Bunting SC, Wright HA (1983) Ignition capabilities of non-flaming firebrands. J For 72:646–649Google Scholar
  16. California Building Code (2007) California code of regulations title 24, part 2Google Scholar
  17. Chase CH (1984) Spotting distance from wind-driven surface fires – extensions of equations for pocket calculators (Research Note INT-346). Intermountain Forest and Range Exp Sta, US Forest Service, OgdenGoogle Scholar
  18. Clements HB (1977) Lift-off of forest firebrands (Res pap SE-159). US Forest Service, Southeastern Forest Experiment Sta, AshevilleGoogle Scholar
  19. Cruz MB et al (2012) Anatomy of a catastrophic wildfire: the black Saturday Kilmore East fire in Victoria. Aust For Ecol Mgt 284:269–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dowling VP (1994) Ignition of timber bridges in bushfires. Fire Saf J 22:145–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ellis PF (2000) The aerodynamic and combustion characteristics of eucalypt bark – a firebrand study (PdD diss). Australian Nat Univ, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  22. Fairbank JP, Bainer R (1934) Spark arresters for motorized equipment, Bulletin 577. Univ Calif Experiment Sta, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  23. Ford RT Sr (1995) Investigation of wildfires. Maverick Publ, SunriverGoogle Scholar
  24. Harada K, Ohmiya Y (1999) Report of the hotel fire in Shirahama. Part 1. Damage by fire spread. J Jpn Assn Fire Sci Eng 49:9–15Google Scholar
  25. Huang H et al (2007) A numerical study of firebrands scattering in urban fire based on CFD and firebrands aerodynamics measurements. J Fire Sci 25:355–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kamei K (1960) Study on the mechanism of fire spread due to fire brands. Building Research Institute, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  27. Keetch JJ (1941) Smoker fires and firebrands (Tech note 49). Appalachian For Exp Sta, AshevilleGoogle Scholar
  28. Lautenberger C, Fernandez-Pello AC (2008) Modeling ignition of combustible fuel beds by embers and heated particles. Forest Fires 2008, ToledoGoogle Scholar
  29. Luke RH, McArthur AG (1978) Bushfires in Australia. Australian Gov Publ Off, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  30. Manzello SL (2014) Enabling the investigation of structure vulnerabilities to wind-driven firebrand showers in Wildland-Urban Interface (WUI) fires. Fire Saf Sci 11:83–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Manzello SL, Suzuki S (2012) The new and improved Dragon’s LAIR (Lofting and Ignition Research) facility. Fire Mat 36:623–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Manzello et al (2006) On the ignition of fuel beds by firebrands. Fire Mat 30:77–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Manzello SL et al (2008) On the development and characterization of a firebrand generator. Fire Saf J 43:258–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Manzello SL et al (2009) Investigation on the ability of glowing firebrands deposited within crevices to ignition common building materials. Fire Saf J 44:894–900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Maranghides A, Mell W (2009) A case study of a community affected by the Witch and Guejito fires. NIST Tech Note 1635Google Scholar
  36. Maxwell FD, Mohler CL (1973) Exhaust particle ignition characteristics, Tech. Report 12. Dept Statistics, Univ Calif, RiversideGoogle Scholar
  37. McArthur AG (1967) Fire behaviour in eucalypt forests (Leaflet 107). Forestry & Timber Bur, Dept Natural Dev, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  38. McArthur NA, Lutton P (1991) Ignition of exterior building details in bushfires: an experimental study. Fire Mat 15:59–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Merzhanov AG (1966) On critical conditions for thermal explosion of a hot spot. Comb Flame 10:341–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Morris GA (1987) A simple method of computing spotting distances from wind-driven surface fires (Res Note INT-374). Intermountain Forest and Range Exp Sta, US Forest Service, OgdenGoogle Scholar
  41. Muraszew A (1974) Firebrand phenomena, Aerospace rep. ATR-74(8165-01)-1 prepared for Riverside Forest Fire Laboratory, Pacific SW Forest and Range Exp Sta, US Forest Service. The Aerospace Corp, El SegundoGoogle Scholar
  42. Muraszew A et al (1976) Investigation of fire whirls and firebrands, Aerospace Rep. ATR-76(7509)-1 prepared for Intermountain Forest and Range Exp Sta, US Forest Service. The Aerospace Corp, El SegundoGoogle Scholar
  43. Murphy K et al (2007) An assessment of fuel treatment effects on fire behavior, suppression effectiveness, and structure ignition on the Angora Fire, report R5-TP-025. US Forest ServiceGoogle Scholar
  44. Ohmiya O, Iwami T (2000) An investigation of the distribution of fire brands and spot fires due to a hotel fire. Fire Sci Tech 20:27–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Parrott RT, Donald CM (1970) Ignitability of swards of various annual grasses. Aust J Exp Ag Anim Husb 10:76–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ramsey GC, McArthur NA (1995) Building in the urban interface: lessons from the January 1994 Sydney bushfires. Bushfire ‘95, HobartGoogle Scholar
  47. Riddle GW, Blanchard B (1917) Methods of testing roof coverings at underwriters’ laboratories. NFPA Q 10:365–377Google Scholar
  48. Sánchez Tarifa C et al (1965) On the flight paths and lifetimes of burning particles of wood. Proc Combust Inst 10:1021–1037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sánchez Tarifa C et al (1967) Transport and combustion of firebrands, Final Report of US Forest Service Grants FG-SP-114 and FG-SP-146. Instituto Nacional de Tecnica Aeroespacial “Esteban Terradas”, MadridGoogle Scholar
  50. Sardoy N et al (2007) Modeling transport and combustion of firebrands from burning trees. Comb Flame 150:151–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sharifian A, Hashempour J (2016) A novel ember shower simulator for assessing performance of low porosity screens at high wind speeds against firebrand attacks. J Fire Sci 34:335–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Slaughter R (1996) California’s I-zone. Calif State Fire Marshal, SacramentoGoogle Scholar
  53. Underwriters Laboratories (2014) Standard test methods for fire tests of roof coverings, UL 790Google Scholar
  54. Vodvarka FJ (1969) Firebrand field studies. Final report. May 24, 1968-August 23, 1969 (IITRI-J6148-FR), IIT Res Inst, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  55. Waterman TE, Takata AN (1969) Laboratory study of ignition of host materials by firebrands (Project J6142, OCD Work Unit 2539A). IIT Res Inst, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  56. Wilson R (1962) The Los Angeles conflagration of 1961: the devil wind and wood shingles. NFPA Q 55:241–228Google Scholar
  57. Woycheese JP (2000) Brand lofting and propagation from large-scale fires (PhD diss). U Calif, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  58. Woycheese JP et al (1999) Combustion models for wooden brands. ICFRE3 – Proc 3rd Int Conf Fire Res Eng, SFPE: 53–71Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fire Science and Technology Inc., and Department of Mechanical and Aerospace EngineeringUniversity of CaliforniaSan DiegoUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Sayaka Suzuki
    • 1
  1. 1.National Research Institute of Fire and Disaster (NRIFD)TokyoJapan