Encyclopedia of Wildfires and Wildland-Urban Interface (WUI) Fires

Living Edition
| Editors: Samuel L. Manzello

Fire Adapted Community

  • Travis B. PaveglioEmail author
  • Catrin M. Edgeley
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51727-8_114-1

Synonyms

Definition

A fire adapted community (FAC) is comprised of residents, land management professionals, local politicians, emergency managers, and fire professionals who collaborate effectively to plan for, respond to, and recover from the evolving risks that fires pose to humans within or outside of the Wildland Urban Interface (WUI). The shared perspectives and collective actions of people comprising FACs allow fires to occur with minimal impact to human functioning or well-being while reducing the need for active suppression. The membership, size, values, or actions constituting FACs may vary across or within landscapes. Regardless of their composition, members of FACs recognize the important ecological role that fire serves in broader landscapes and promote or mimic its use in ways that support ecosystem health.

The Emergence of Fire Adapted Communities

The recent focus on fire adapted...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Abrams J, Davis EJ, Wollstein K (2017) Rangeland fire protection associations in Great Basin rangelands: a model for adaptive community relationships with wildfire? Hum Ecol 45(6):773–785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brenkert-Smith H, Meldrum JR, Champ PA, Barth CM (2017) Where you stand depends on where you sit: qualitative inquiry into notions of fire adaptation. Ecol Soc 22(3):7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Czaja MR (2015) Wildland fire management: movement towards enabling resiliency? In: Disaster management: enabling resilience. Springer, Cham, pp 287–315Google Scholar
  4. Dickinson K, Brenkert-Smith H, Champ P, Flores N (2015) Catching fire? Social interactions, beliefs, and wildfire risk mitigation behaviors. Soc Nat Resour 28:807–824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dombeck MP, Williams JE, Wood CA (2004) Wildfire policy and public lands: integrating scientific understanding with social concerns across landscapes. Conserv Biol 18(4):883–889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Eriksen C, Prior T (2011) The art of learning: wildfire, amenity migration and local environmental knowledge. Int J Wildland Fire 20(4):612–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Evers CR, Ager AA, Nielsen-Pincus M, Palaiologou P, Bunzel K (2019) Archetypes of community wildfire exposure from national forests of the Western US. Landsc Urban Plan 182:55–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. FACC (2019) Fire adapted communities. Accessed 27 June 2019 at: https://fireadapted.org/
  9. Fire Adapted Communities Learning Network (2019) Fire adapted communities learning network. Accessed 29 June 2019 at: https://fireadaptednetwork.org/
  10. Fischer AP, Spies TA, Steelman TA, Moseley C, Johnson BR, Bailey JD et al (2016) Wildfire risk as a socioecological pathology. Front Ecol Environ 14(5):276–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. International Association of Wildland fire Chiefs (IAFC) (2019) Ready, Set, Go! Accessed 27 June 2019 at https://www.wildlandfirersg.org
  12. International Code Council (ICC) (2019) 2018 international wildland-urban Interface code. Accessed 25 June 2019 at: https://codes.iccsafe.org/content/IWUIC2018/effective-use-of-the-international-wildland-urban-interface-code
  13. Jakes PJ, Langer ER (2012) The adaptive capacity of New Zealand communities to wildfire. Int J Wildland Fire 21:764–772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jakes PJ, Carroll MS, Paveglio TB, Newman S (2010) The role of adaptive capacity in creating fire-adapted human communities. JFSP Research Project Report 10Google Scholar
  15. Jakes PJ, Nelson KC, Enzler SA, Burns S, Cheng AS, Sturtevant V et al (2011) Community wildfire protection planning: is the healthy forests restoration Act’s vagueness genius? Int J Wildland Fire 20(3):350–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kolden CA, Henson C (2019) A social-ecological approach to mitigating wildfire vulnerability in the wildland urban interface: a case study from the 2017 Thomas fire. Fire 2(1):1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Leschak P (2010) Strong partnerships and the right tools: the pre-wildfire strategy of fire adapted communities. Disaster Saf Rev 8:4–5Google Scholar
  18. Meldrum JR, Brenkert-Smith H, Champ PA, Falk L, Wilson P, Barth CM (2018) Wildland–urban Interface residents’ relationships with wildfire: variation within and across communities. Soc Nat Resour 31(10):1132–1148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mockrin MH, Stewart SI, Radeloff VC, Hammer RB, Alexandre PM (2015) Adapting to wildfire: rebuilding after home loss. Soc Nat Resour 28(8):839–856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) (2019) Firewise communities. Accessed 28 June 19 at: https://www.nfpa.org/Public-Education/Fire-causes-and-risks/Wildfire/Firewise-USA
  21. National Wildfire Coordinating Group (NWCG) (2017) Wildland urban interface wildfire mitigation desk reference guide. PMS 051Google Scholar
  22. Paveglio T, Edgeley C (2017) Community diversity and hazard events: understanding the evolution of local approaches to wildfire. Nat Hazards 87(2):1083–1108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Paveglio TB, Moseley C, Carroll MS, Williams DR, Davis EJ, Fischer AP (2015) Categorizing the social context of the wildland urban interface: adaptive capacity for wildfire and community “archetypes”. For Sci 61(2):298–310Google Scholar
  24. Paveglio TB, Abrams J, Ellison A (2016) Developing fire adapted communities: the importance of interactions among elements of local context. Soc Nat Resour 29(10):1246–1261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Paveglio TB, Nielsen-Pincus M, Abrams J, Moseley C (2017a) Advancing characterization of social diversity in the wildland-urban interface: an indicator approach for wildfire management. Landsc Urban Plan 160:115–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Paveglio TB, Boyd AD, Carroll MS (2017b) Re-conceptualizing community in risk research. J Risk Res 20(7):931–951CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Paveglio TB, Carroll MS, Stasiewicz AM, Williams DR, Becker DR (2018) Incorporating social diversity into wildfire management: proposing “pathways” for fire adaptation. For Sci 64(5):515–532Google Scholar
  28. Paveglio TB, Carroll MS, Stasiewicz AM, Edgeley CM (2019a) Social fragmentation and wildfire management: exploring the scale of adaptive action. Management 71(74):12–98Google Scholar
  29. Paveglio TB, Edgeley CM, Carroll MS, Billings M, Stasiewicz A (2019b) Exploring the influence of local social context on strategies for achieving fire adapted communities. Fire 2:26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Penman TD, Eriksen C, Horsey B, Green A, Lemcke D, Cooper P, Bradstock RA (2017) Retrofitting for wildfire resilience: what is the cost? Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 21:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rasch R, McCaffrey S (2019) Exploring wildfire-prone community trust in wildfire management agencies. For Sci. Accessed 24 Aug 19:  https://doi.org/10.1093/forsci/fxz027/5512548
  32. Roos CI, Scott AC, Belcher CM, Chaloner WG, Aylen J, Bird RB et al (2016) Living on a flammable planet: interdisciplinary, cross-scalar and varied cultural lessons, prospects and challenges. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 371(1696):20150469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schoennagel T, Balch JK, Brenkert-Smith H, Dennison PE, Harvey BJ, Krawchuk MA, …Whitlock C (2017) Adapt to more wildfire in western North American forests as climate changes. Proc Natl Acad Sci 114(18):4582–4590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Smith AM, Kolden CA, Paveglio TB, Cochrane MA, Bowman DM, Moritz MA et al (2016) The science of firescapes: achieving fire-resilient communities. Bioscience 66(2):130–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Steelman T (2016) US wildfire governance as social-ecological problem. Ecol Soc 21(4): 1–14Google Scholar
  36. Steelman TA, Burke CA (2007) Is wildfire policy in the United States sustainable? J For 105(2):67–72Google Scholar
  37. Steelman TA, McCaffrey SM (2011) What is limiting more flexible fire management—public or agency pressure? J For 109(8):454–461Google Scholar
  38. Strahan K, Whittaker J, Handmer J (2018) Self-evacuation archetypes in Australian bushfire. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 27:307–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Toman E, Stidham M, McCaffrey S, Shindler B (2013) Social science at the wildland-urban interface: a compendium of research results to create fire adapted communities. General Technical Report NRS-111. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Newtown Square, 75p, 111, 1-75Google Scholar
  40. United States Department of Agriculture (2019) Fire adapted communities. Accessed 28 Aug 19: https://www.fs.fed.us/managing-land/fire/fac
  41. United States Department of Agriculture and United States Department of the Interior (2005) Quadrennial fire and fuel review report. Accessed 1 Sept 19: https://www.forestsandrangelands.gov/documents/strategy/foundational/qffr_final_report_20050719.pdf
  42. WFLC (2014) National cohesive WUI fire management strategy. Accessed 26 June 2019 at: https://www.forestsandrangelands.gov/strategy/
  43. Williams DR (2017) The role of place-based social learning. In: Weber EP, Lach D, Steel B (eds) New strategies for wicked problems: science and solutions in the 21st century. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis, pp 149–168Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Natural Resources and Society, College of Natural ResourcesUniversity of IdahoMoscowUSA
  2. 2.School of Forestry, College of the Environment, Forestry, and Natural SciencesNorthern Arizona UniversityFlagstaffUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Raphaele Blanchi
    • 1
  1. 1.Land & WaterCSIROMelbourneAustralia