Linearbandkeramik Site Excavation

  • Daniela HofmannEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51726-1_1826-2

Introduction and Definition

The Linearbandkeramik (Linear Pottery culture, LBK) is the earliest Neolithic culture so far defined in Central Europe. At its maximum extent, it reaches from western Hungary (where it emerges around 5500 cal BCE) to the Paris Basin, into Ukraine, and as far as the Northern European Plain. The LBK is characterized by a distinctive style of pottery (with linear bands) and monumental wooden longhouses flanked by pits. Enclosures and burial grounds also occasionally occur. In the earliest phase (until about 5250 cal BCE), material culture is more uniform, but this gives way to increasing regionalization until the LBK is finally replaced by a series of successor cultures, a regionally varied process completed by about 4900 cal BCE.

Key Issues/Current Debates/Future Directions/Examples

Finding Sites

Most LBK sites are located on fertile loesssoils, on the terraces of river valleys. Loess is a wind-borne glacial sediment deposited during the Ice Age which turned...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Bogaard, A., R. Krause, and H.-C. Strien. 2011. Towards a social geography of cultivation and plant use in an early farming community: Vaihingen an der Enz, south-west Germany. Antiquity 85: 395–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bogaard, A., R.-M. Arbogast, R. Ebersbach, R.A. Fraser, C. Knipper, C. Krahn, M. Schäfer, A. Styring, and R. Krause. 2016. The Bandkeramik settlement of Vaihingen an der Enz, Kreis Ludwigsburg (Baden-Württemberg): An integrated perspective on land use, economy and diet. Germania 94: 1–60.Google Scholar
  3. Denaire, A., P. Lefranc, J. Wahl, C. Bronk Ramsey, E. Dunbar, T. Goslar, A. Bayliss, N. Beavan, P. Bickle, and A. Whittle. 2017. The cultural project: Formal chronological modelling of the early and middle Neolithic sequence in lower Alsace. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 24: 1072–1149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Elburg, R. 2011. Weihwasser oder Brauwasser? Einige Gedanken zur Funktion bandkeramischer Brunnen. Archäologische Informationen 34: 25–37.Google Scholar
  5. Ilett, M. 2012. Linear pottery and Blicquy/Villeneuve-Saint-Germain settlement in the Aisne valley and its environs. An overview. In Siedlungsstruktur und Kulturwandel in der Bandkeramik. Beiträge der internationalen Tagung “Neue Fragen zur Bandkeramik oder alles beim Alten?!”, ed. R. Smolnik, 69–79. Leipzig: Landesamt für Archäologie Sachsen.Google Scholar
  6. Pavlů, I., P. Květina, and R. Šumberova. 2017. Large-scale excavations to understand the past. In European archaeology – Identities & migrations. Hommages à Jean-Paul Demoule, ed. L. Manolakakis, N. Schlanger, and A. Coudart, 299–313. Leiden: Sidestone Press.Google Scholar
  7. Schalich, J. 1988. Boden- und Landschaftsgeschichte. In Der bandkeramische Siedlungsplatz Langweiler 8, Gemeinde Aldenhoven, Kreis Düren, ed. U. Boelicke, D. von Brandt, J. Lüning, P. Stehli, and A. Zimmermann, 17–29. Köln: Rheinland-Verlag.Google Scholar
  8. Stäuble, H., and U. Veit, eds. 2016. Der bandkeramische Siedlungsplatz Eythra in Sachsen: Studien zur Chronologie und Siedlungsentwicklung. Leipziger Forschungen zur ur- und frühgeschichtlichen Archäologie 9. Leipzig: Professur für Ur- und Frühgeschichte.Google Scholar
  9. Stäuble, H., and S. Wolfram. 2012. Taphonomie heute: Reanimation erwünscht. Studien zur Bandkeramik. In Taphonomische Forschungen (nicht nur) im Neolithikum, ed. T. Link and D. Schimmelpfennig, 35–55. Kerpen-Loogh: Welt und Erde.Google Scholar
  10. Stehli, P. 1994. Chronologie der Bandkeramik im Merzbachtal. In Die Bandkeramik im Merzbachtal auf der Aldenhovener Platte, Rheinische Ausgrabungen Band 36, ed. J. Lüning and P. Stehli, 79–191. Köln: Rheinland Verlag.Google Scholar
  11. Turck, R., B. Kober, J. Kontny, F. Haack, and A. Zeeb-Lanz. 2012. “Widely travelled people” at Herxheim? Sr isotopes as indicators of mobility. In Population dynamics in prehistory and early history. New approaches using stable isotopes and genetics, ed. E. Kaiser, J. Burger, and W. Schier, 149–164. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  12. Van de Velde, P. 2007. The Bandkeramik settlement. In Excavations at Geleen-Janskamperveld 1990/1991. Analecta Praehistorica Leidensia vol. 39, ed. P. van de Velde, 223–244. Leiden: Leiden University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Zimmermann, A. 2012. Das Hofplatzmodell. Entwicklung, Probleme, Perspektiven. In Siedlungsstruktur und Kulturwandel in der Bandkeramik. Beiträge der internationalen Tagung “Neue Fragen zur Bandkeramik oder alles beim Alten?!”, ed. R. Smolnik, 11–19. Leipzig: Landesamt für Archäologie Sachsen.Google Scholar
  14. Zimmermann, A., J. Meuers-Balke, and A. Kalis. 2005. Das Neolithikum im Rheinland. Bonner Jahrbücher 205: 1–63.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Archaeology, History, Cultural Studies and ReligionUniversity of BergenBergenNorway

Section editors and affiliations

  • Sandra Montón-Subías
    • 1
  • Bisserka Gaydarska
    • 2
  1. 1.Departament d’HumanitatsICREA/Universitat Pompeu FabraBarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.Department of ArchaeologyDurham UniversityDurhamUK