Kennewick Man Case: Tribal Consultation, Scientific Studies, and Legal Issues

  • Francis P. McManamon
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51726-1_1655-2

Introduction

The human skeletal remains now referred to as the “Kennewick Man” or the “Ancient One” were found in July 1996 in shallow water along the southern shore of Lake Wallula, a section of the Columbia River pooled behind McNary Dam in Kennewick, Washington. In February 2017, at an undisclosed location somewhere in the internal basin of the Columbia River, not far from the river, the remains were reburied by members of the tribes who had constantly sought such an outcome throughout the more than two decades since the discovery of the remains. This act concluded, if it did not resolve, arguments about how this set of ancient human remains should be treated. One can anticipate that cultural, legal, and scientific aspects of the case will continue to be debated and discussed in the future although the proximate question about how to treat the remains has been answered.

Discovery and the Start of the Case

The Kennewick skeletal remains were discovered by a pair of college students...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Babbitt, B. 2000. Letter from Secretary of the Interior Bruce Babbitt to Secretary of the Army Louis Caldera regarding disposition of the Kennewick human remains. (tDAR id: 6357).  https://doi.org/10.6067/XCV84T6J2R. https://core.tdar.org/document/6357/letter-from-secretary-of-the-interior-bruce-babbitt-to-secretary-of-the-army-louis-caldera-regarding-disposition-of-the-kennewick-human-remains. Accessed 20 Sept 2017.
  2. Brace, C. Loring, A. Russell Nelson, Noriko Seguchi, Hiroaki Oe, Leslie Sering, Pan Qifeng, Yongyi Li, and Dashtseveg Tumen. 2001. Old world sources of the first new world human inhabitants: A comparative craniofacial view. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) 98 (17): 10017–10022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bruning, Susan B. 2006. Complex legal legacies: The native American graves protection and repatriation act, scientific study, and Kennewick Man. American Antiquity 71: 501–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burke, Heather, Claire Smith, Dorothy Lippert, Joe Watkins, and Larry Zimmerman. 2008. Kennewick Man: Perspectives on the ancient one. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
  5. Cassman, Vicki, and Nancy Odegaard. 2004. Human remains and the conservator’s role. Studies in Conservation 49 (4): 271–282. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25487703. Accessed 24 Oct 2011.Google Scholar
  6. Chatters, James C. 2000. The recovery and first analysis of an early Holocene human skeleton from Kennewick, Washington. American Antiquity 65 (2): 291–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Colwell, C. 2017. How should the Ancient One’s story end? Denver Post Guest Commentary. Saturday 14 May 2016. http://www.denverpost.com/2016/05/13/how-should-the-ancient-ones-story-end/. Accessed 20 Sept 2017.
  8. Dillehay, Tom D. 2009. Probing deeper into first American studies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) 106 (4): 971–978.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0808424106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Downey, Roger. 2000. Riddle of the bones: Politics, science, race, and the story of Kennewick Man. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  10. The Economist. 2000. Kennewick Man: Boneheaded. The Economist, 28 September 2000. http://www.economist.com/node/382978. Accessed 23 Sept 2017.
  11. Gould, Ronald M. 2004. Opinion, Bonnichsen v. United States, 4 February 2004, 1579. ff. No. 02–35994 D.C. No. CV-96-01481-JE. San Francisco: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth CircuitGoogle Scholar
  12. Inslee, J. 2017. Kennewick Man brought home to his final resting place. WA Governor’s Office: News and Updates. https://medium.com/wagovernor/kennewick-man-brought-home-to-his-final-resting-place-b3b6015d0066. Accessed 20 Sept 2017.
  13. Jelderks, John. 2002. Opinion and Order, Bonnichsen, et al. v. United States, et al., 30 August 2002, (D. Oregon, Civil No. 96-1481-JE). Portland: United States District Court, District of Oregon.Google Scholar
  14. Larson, C.S. 1998. Review: “Department of Interior Approach to Documentation, Analysis, Interpretation, and Disposition of Human Remains Inadvertently Discovered at Columbia Park, Kennewick, WA”. (Draft Document of 20 October 1998). (tDAR id: 374890).  https://doi.org/10.6067/XCV81R6PR2. https://core.tdar.org/document/374890/review-department-of-interior-approach-to-documentation-analysis-interpretation-and-disposition-of-human-remains-inadvertently-discovered-at-columbia-park-kennewick-wa-draft-document-of-20-october-1998. Accessed 20 Sept 2017.
  15. McManamon, F.P. 1998. Research design: Approach to documentation, analysis, interpretation, and disposition of human remains inadvertently discovered at Columbian Park, Kennewick, WA. (tDAR id: 374889).  https://doi.org/10.6067/XCV8X0669B. https://core.tdar.org/document/374889/research-design-approach-to-documentation-analysis-interpretation-and-disposition-of-human-remains-inadvertently-discovered-at-columnbia-park-kennewick-wa. Accessed 20 Sept 2017.
  16. McManamon, F.P. 2000. Memorandum: Determination that the Kennewick skeletal remains are “Native American” for the purposes of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA). Memorandum to Assistant Secretary, Fish and Wildlife and Parks, Department of the Interior, 13 January 2000. (tDAR ID: 365165).  https://doi.org/10.6067/XCV81Z435N. https://core.tdar.org/document/365165/memorandum-determination-that-the-kennewick-skeltal-remains-are-native-american-for-the-purposes-of-the-native-american-graves-protection-and-repatriation-act-nagpra. Accessed 23 Sept 2017.
  17. McManamon, F.P. 2013. The archaeology of Kennewick Man. The Digital Archaeological Record (tDAR) Project ID 6325.  https://doi.org/10.6067/XCV8W95BK9. http://core.tdar.org/project/6325. Accessed 2 Apr 2013.
  18. McManamon, F.P., Powell, J.F., Rose, J.C., Huckleberry, G., Stein, J.K., and Fagan, J.L.. 1999. Report on the non-destructive examination, description, and analysis of the human remains from Columbia Park, Kennewick, Washington. (tDAR id: 365161).  https://doi.org/10.6067/XCV8KK999C. https://core.tdar.org/document/365161/report-on-the-non-destructive-examination-description-and-analysis-of-the-human-remains-from-columbia-park-kennewick-washington-october-1999. Accessed 20 Sept 2017.
  19. McManamon, Francis P., Jason Roberts, Brooke S. Blades, Kenneth Ames, Daniel L. Boxberger, Stacy Rasmus, Eugene S. Hunn, and Steven Hackenberger. 2000a. Cultural affiliation report Kennewick Man: All chapters. Washington, DC: National Park Service, Department of the Interior. (tDAR id: 376907).  https://doi.org/10.6067/XCV8CC10CQ. https://core.tdar.org/document/376907/cultural-affiliation-report-kennewick-man-all-chapters. Accessed 20 Sept 2017.
  20. McManamon, Francis P., Jason Roberts, Brooke Blades, David Smith, R. E. Taylor, Frederica Kaestle, D. Andrew Merriwether, Graciela Cabana, Ripan Malhi, Jason Eshleman, Philip Walker, Clark Larsen, and Joseph Powell. 2000b. Report on the skeletal taphonomy, dating, and DNA testing results of the Kennewick human remains from Columbia Park, Kennewick, Washington. Washington, DC: National Park Service, Department of the Interior. (tDAR id: 6749).  https://doi.org/10.6067/XCV8GB22N0. https://core.tdar.org/document/6749/report-on-the-skeltal-taphonomy-dating-and-dna-testing-results-of-the-kennewick-human-remains-from-columbia-park-kennewick-washington-september-2000. Accessed 20 Sept 2017.
  21. Nickens, P.R. 1996. Report on the discovery and recovery of human remains from Columbia Park Site, Kennewick, WA, July-September 1996. https://core.tdar.org/document/391003/a-report-on-the-discovery-and-recovery-of-human-remains-from-columbia-park-site-kennewick-wa-july-september-1996. Accessed 24 Sept 2017.
  22. Nickens, Paul R. 1998. Discovery of ancient remains at Kennewick site and subsequent events. In Geologic, geoarcheologic, and historical investigation of the discovery site of ancient remains in Columbia Park, Kennewick, Washington, Technical Report GL-98-13, ed. Wakeley, L., W.L. Murphy, J.B. Dunbar, A.G. Warner, F.L. Briuer, and P. R. Nickens, B1–B7. Vicksburg: Waterways Experiment Station, U.S. Army, Corps of Engineers. (tDAR ID: 374888).  https://doi.org/10.6067/XCV8WW7FVT. https://core.tdar.org/document/374888. Accessed 7 Feb 2013.
  23. Novembre, J., D. Witonsky, and A. Di Rienzo. 2016. Technical report: Assessment of the genetic analyses of Rasmussen et al. (2015). Report prepared for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, St. Louis District (Contract #W912P9-16-P-0010). (tDAR id: 439879).  https://doi.org/10.6067/XCV8RR21XN. https://core.tdar.org/document/439879/technical-report-assessment-of-the-genetic-analyses-of-rasmussen-et-al-2015. Accessed 11 Nov 2017.
  24. Owsley, Douglas W., and Richard L. Jantz. 2001. Archaeological politics and public interest in Paleoamerican studies: Lessons from Gordon Creek Woman and Kennewick Man. American Antiquity 66: 565–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Owsley, Douglas W., and Richard L. Jantz, eds. 2014. Kennewick Man: The scientific investigation of an ancient American skeleton. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Rasmussen, Morten, Martin Sikora, Anders Albrechtsen, Thorfinn Sand Korneliussen, J. Vıctor Moreno-Mayar, G. David Poznik, Christoph P.E. Zollikofer, Marcia S. Ponce de Leon, Morten E. Allentoft, Ida Moltke, Hakon Jonsson, Cristina Valdiosera, Ripan S. Malhi, Ludovic Orlando, Carlos D. Bustamante, Thomas W. Stafford Jr., David J. Meltzer, Rasmus Nielsen, and Eske Willerslev. 2015. The ancestry and affiliations of Kennewick Man. Nature 523: 455–464.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Schurr, Theodore G. 2004. The peopling of the new world: Perspectives from molecular anthropology. Annual Review of Anthropology 33: 551–583.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.33.070203.143932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Smith, B.D. 1998. Review and comment on the draft research design (20 October 1998): Approach to documentation, analysis, interpretation, and disposition of human remains inadvertently discovered at Columbia Park, Kennewick, WA. (tDAR id: 374891).  https://doi.org/10.6067/XCV80R9NPH. https://core.tdar.org/document/374891/review-and-comment-on-the-draft-research-design-20-october-1998-approach-to-documentation-analysis-interpretation-and-disposition-of-human-remains-inadvertently-discovered-at-columbia-park-kennewick-wa. Accessed 20 Sept 2017.
  29. Spellmon, Scott A. 2016. Native American determination for Kennewick Man, Document on file. Portland: Northwestern Division, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. (tDAR id: 439882).  https://doi.org/10.6067/XCV8N0196Z. https://core.tdar.org/document/439882/native-american-determination-for-kennewick-man. Accessed 11 Nov 2017.
  30. Spiegel, J.L., and D.J. Barry. 1998. An interagency agreement between DoA and DoI on the delegation of responsibilities for the Kennewick human remains [March 24, 1998]. (tDAR id: 365163).  https://doi.org/10.6067/XCV8KS6QDV. https://core.tdar.org/document/365163/an-interagency-agreement-between-doa-and-doi-on-the-delegation-of-responsibilities-for-the-kennewick-human-remains-march-24-1998. Accessed 20 Sept 2017.
  31. Swedlund, Alan, and Duane Anderson. 1999. Gordon Creek Woman meets Kennewick Man: New interpretations and protocols regarding the peopling of the Americas. American Antiquity 64: 569–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Swedlund, Alan, and Duane Anderson. 2003. Gordon Creek Woman meets spirit cave man: A response to comment by Owsley and Jantz. American Antiquity 68: 161–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Taylor, R.E., David Glenn Smith, and John R. Southon. 2001. The Kennewick skeleton: Chronological and biomolecular contexts. Radiocarbon 43: 965–976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Thomas, David Hurst. 2000. Skull wars: Kennewick Man, archaeology, and the battle for native American identity. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  35. Watkins, Joe E. 2003. Beyond the margin: American Indians, First Nations, and archaeology in North America. American Antiquity 68: 273–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Digital Antiquity, School of Human Evolution and Social ChangeArizona State UniversityTempeUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Marcel Otte
    • 1
  1. 1.Service of PrehistoryUniversity of LiègeLiègeBelgium