Ethics and Human Remains

  • Soren BlauEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51726-1_160-2

… due dignity and respect should be afforded in the recovery, storage, investigation and reburial of human remains regardless of their context. (Hunter et al.2001: 176)

Ethics is a branch of philosophy concerned with the evaluation of the principles and standards of human conduct that govern the behavior of individuals and groups (Bottorff 2005). Most professions adhere to an agreed code of conduct, commonly referred to as a “code of ethics,” with the intention being that all practitioners should undertake “best practice.” In reality, however, definitions of “best practice” vary because different cultures, societies, and groups have diverse value systems, namely, their own definitions of what is considered right (appropriate) and wrong (Walker 2000: 20; White 2000: 319). Because of the emotive nature of death, the treatment of human remains is often contentious and poses many ethical dilemmas.

Locating and Recovering Human Remains: Digging Up the Dead

While human remains may be located...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Adams, P. 2000. Death and contemporary popular culture. In Death and dying in Australia, ed. A. Kellehear, 105–115. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Afrasiabi, P.R. 1997. Property rights in ancient human skeletal remains. Southern California Law Review 70: 805–840.Google Scholar
  3. Anon. 1997. Prince of Wales Hospital Randwick Destitute Children’s Asylum Cemetery Excavation Project, 1995–1996. Final report; volume 3 Physical Anthropology (Call No.: MLMSS 6684/10).Google Scholar
  4. Anon. 2007. Remains of Roman teenager buried. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/london/6563909.stm. Accessed 25 Apr 2007.
  5. Baudrillard, J. 1993. Symbolic exchange and death. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Bahn, P. 1984. Do not disturb? Archaeology and the rights of the dead. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 3 (2): 127–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beloff, H. 2003. Medical ethics in professional conduct. International Journal of Human Rights 7 (1): 9–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blaauw, M., and V. Lahteenmaki. 2002. ‘Denial and silence’ or acknowledgement and disclosure. International Review of the Red Cross 84: 767–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blau, S. 2015. Working as a forensic archaeologist and/or anthropologist in post-conflict contexts: A consideration of professional responsibilities to the missing, the dead and their relatives. In Ethics, archaeology and violence, ed. A. González-Ruibal and G. Moshenska, 215–228. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  10. Blau, S. 2016. More than just bare bones: Ethical considerations for forensic anthropologists. In Handbook of forensic anthropology and archaeology, ed. S. Blau and D.H. Ubelaker, 2nd ed., 593–606. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Bottorff, D.L. 2005. What is Ethics? http://www.ethicsquality.com/about.htlm. Accessed 12 Feb 2002.
  12. Budimlija, Z.M., M.K. Prinz, A. Zelson-Mundorff, J. Wiersema, E. Bartelink, G. MacKinnon, B.L. Nazzaruolo, S.M. Estacio, M.J. Hennessey, and R.C. Shaler. 2003. World trade center human identification project: Experiences with individual body identification cases. Croatian Medical Journal 44 (3): 259–263.Google Scholar
  13. Burns, K.R. 1998. Forensic anthropology and human rights issues. In Forensic osteology: Advances in the identification of human remains, ed. K. Reichs, 63–85. Springfield: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
  14. Cantwell, A. 2000. “Who knows the power of his bones”: Reburial redux. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 925: 79–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cooper, M. 2011. Bodies under Queen Vic haunt market revamp. The Age March 11. http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/bodies-under-queen-vic-haunt-market-revamp-20110311-1bqsp.html. Accessed 27 Sep 2011.
  16. Donlon, D. 1994. Aboriginal skeletal collections and research in physical anthropology: An historical perspective. Australian Archaeology 39: 73–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fondebrider, L. 2002. Reflections on the scientific documentation of human rights violations. International Review of the Red Cross 84 (848): 885–891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Frekelton, I. 1988. Identification and the law. In Craniofacial identification in forensic medicine, ed. J.G. Clement and D.L. Ranson, 257–265. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
  19. Griffis, L. 2001. Investigating bones: The work of the C.A. pound human identification laboratory. CLASnotes 15(3). http://clasnews.clas.ufl.edu/news/clasnotes/0103/pound/html. Accessed 07 Feb 2006.
  20. Hubert, J. 1992. Dry bones or living ancestors? Conflicting perceptions of life, death and the universe. International Journal of Cultural Property 1 (1): 105–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hunt, D.R., and J. Albanese. 2005. History and demographic composition of the Robert J. Terry anatomical collection. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 127 (4): 406–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hunter, J.R., M.B. Brickley, J. Bourgeois, W. Bouts, L. Bourguignon, F. Hubrechts, J. de Wine, H. van Haaster, T. Hakbijl, H. de Jong, L. Smits, L.H. van Wijngaarden, and M. Luschen. 2001. Forensic archaeology, forensic anthropology and human rights in Europe. Science and Justice 41 (3): 173–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hunter, J., and M. Cox. 2005. Social and intellectual frameworks. In Forensic archaeology: Advances in theory and practice, ed. J. Hunter and M. Cox, 204–225. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Jones, D.G., and J.R. Harris. 1998. Archaeological human remains: Scientific, cultural and ethical considerations. Current Anthropology 39 (2): 253–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kadhim, A. 2006. Painful archaeology: Excavating Saddam’s mass graves. Strategic Insights 5(3). http://www.ccc.nps.navy.mil/si/2006/Mar/kadhimMar06.pdf. Accessed 10 June 2006.
  26. Loff, B., and J. Black. 2004. Research ethics committees: What is their contribution? Medical Journal of Australia 181 (8): 440–441.Google Scholar
  27. MacDonald, H. 2005. Human remains: Episodes in human dissection. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Marks, M.K., J.W. Hudson, and S.K. Elkins. 1999. Craniofacial fractures: Collaboration spells success. In Broken bones: Anthropological analysis of blunt force trauma, ed. A. Galloway, 258–286. Springfield: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
  29. McEvoy, K., and H. Conway. 2004. The dead, the law, and the politics of the past. Journal of Law and Society 31 (4): 539–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Meskell, L., and P. Pels. 2005. Introduction: Embedding ethics. In Embedding ethics, ed. L. Meskell and P. Pels, 1–26. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
  31. Molleson, T.I. and Cox, M.J. 1993. The spitalfields project vol 2. The anthropology – The middling sort. Research report 86. York: Council for British Archaeology.Google Scholar
  32. Pardoe, C. 1992. Arches of radii, corridors of power: Reflections on current archaeological practice. In Power, knowledge and aborigines, ed. B. Attwood and J. Arnold, 132–141. Melbourne: La Trobe University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Prior, L. 1989. The social organisation of death: Medical discourse and social practice in Belfast. London: Macmillan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Richardson, R. 1987. Death, dissection and the destitute. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  35. Rose, J.C., T.J. Green, and V.D. Green. 1996. NAGRPA is forever: Osteology and the repatriation of skeletons. Annual Review of Anthropology 25: 81–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sayer, D. 2010. Ethics and burial archaeology. London: Duckworth Publishers.Google Scholar
  37. Schaefer, M.C., and S.M. Black. 2005. Comparison of ages of epiphyseal union in North American and Bosnian skeletal material. Journal of Forensic Sciences 50 (4): 777–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Skinner, M., and J. Sterenberg. 2005. Turf wars: Authority and responsibility for the investigation of mass graves. Forensic Science International 151: 221–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Thompson, T. 2003. The quality and appropriateness of forensic anthropological education in the UK. Public Archaeology 3: 88–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ubelaker, D.H., and L.G. Grant. 1989. Human skeletal remains: Preservation or reburial? American Journal of Physical Anthropology 32: 249–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Walker, P.L. 2000. Bioarchaeological ethics: A historical perspective on the value of human remains. In Biological anthropology of the human skeleton, ed. M.A. Katzenberg and S.R. Saunder, 3–39. New York: Wiley-Liss.Google Scholar
  42. Webb, S. 1987. Reburying Australian skeletons. Antiquity 61: 292–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Weiss, E. 2008. Reburying the past: The effects of repatriation and reburial on scientific inquiry. New York: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  44. White, T. 2000. Human osteology. 2nd ed. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  45. Vizenor, G. 1996. Bone courts: The rights and narrative representation of tribal bones. In Contemporary archaeology in theory: A reader, ed. R.W. Preucel and I. Hodder, 652–663. Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Victorian Institute of Forensic Medicine/Department of Forensic Medicine, Monash UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Section editors and affiliations

  • Soren Blau
    • 1
  • Luis Fondebrider
    • 2
  • Douglas H. Ubelaker
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Forensic MedicineVictorian Institute of Forensic Medicine / Monash UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.The Argentine Forensic Anthropology Team (Equipo Argentino de Antropología Forense, EAAF)Buenos AiresArgentina
  3. 3.National Museum of Natural HistorySmithsonian InstitutionWashingtonUSA