- 7 Downloads
Andrew Van de Ven’s approach to studying change in organizational systems has been to engage it head-on. Over his career, he has developed multiple programs of research that begin with a practical problem and end with practical solutions. In these engagements, he has acted in a scholarly way, creating novel and rigorous theory and methods, to help move from problem to solution and to share the learning and knowledge with others. Van de Ven’s method of engaged scholarship has created a legacy of work in the areas of group decision-making, program planning, organizational assessment and design, and innovation and organizational change.
Van de Ven’s most lasting and widely adopted innovation is the Nominal Group Technique, which aids groups of stakeholders in having an equal voice during difficult decision-making contexts. A Google search on the term elicits hundreds of thousands of hits, and the papers and book associated with it have over 5000 academic citations. Van de Ven’s experiences in developing the Nominal Group Technique led to a more general curiosity about how social organizations change, particularly in the context of innovation and institutional level change. Van de Ven’s theories derive from using dialectics and paradox to explore theoretic tensions, and his methods emphasize the temporal and complex nature of organizational change.
Van de Ven’s legacy on scholarship has also been impacted by the academic leadership positions he has occupied in the Academy of Management, from president to journal editor. His ability to make theoretical and methodological contributions as a scholar, while also helping to solve big, practical problems that businesses have, has been an inspiration to numerous other business researchers.
KeywordsOrganizational change Innovation New product development Engaged scholarship Nominal group technique
- Delbecq, A. (1964). Leadership styles in managerial conferences: Current theoretical approaches. Academy of Management Journal, 7(4), 255–268.Google Scholar
- Delbecq, A. (1967). The management of decision-making within the firm: Three strategies for three types of decision-making. Academy of Management Journal, 10(4), 329–339.Google Scholar
- Delbecq, D., Van de Ven, A., & Gustafson, D. (1975). Group techniques for program planning. Chicago: Scott, Foresman, and Co.Google Scholar
- Glee-Vermande, C. (2016). Andrew Van de Ven – L’innovation: Une aventure. Canada: Editions EMS.Google Scholar
- Huber, G., & Van de Ven, A. (Eds.). (1995). Longitudinal field research methods: Studying processes of organizational change. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publishers.Google Scholar
- Lawrence, P. R., & Lorsch, J. W. (1967). Organization and environment: Managing differentiation and integration. Boston, MA: Harvard University.Google Scholar
- Learnmonth, M., Lockett, A., & Dowd, K. (2011). Promoting scholarship that matters: The uselessness of useful research and the usefulness of useless research. British Journal of Management, 23(1), 35–44.Google Scholar
- Poole, M. S., Van de Ven, A., Dooley, K., & Holmes, M. (2000). Organizational change and innovation processes: Theory and methods for research. Oxford: Oxford Press.Google Scholar
- Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Van de Ven, A. (1974). Group decision making effectiveness: An experimental study. Kent: Kent State University Press.Google Scholar
- Van de Ven, A. (1976a). A framework for organization assessment. Academy of Management Review, 1(1), 64–78.Google Scholar
- Van de Ven, A. (1989). Nothing is quite so practical as a good theory. Academy of Management Review, 15(3), 486–489.Google Scholar
- Van de Ven, A. (2007). Engaged scholarship: A guide for organizational and social research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Van de Ven, A. (2016). Vita. Retrieved from https://sites.google.com/a/umn.edu/avandeven/
- Van de Ven, A., Angle, H., & Poole, M. (Eds.). (1989). Research on the management of innovation: The Minnesota studies. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
- Van de Ven, A., & Delbecq, A. (1971). Nominal and interacting group process for committee decision-making effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 14(2), 203–212.Google Scholar
- Van de Ven, A., & Ferry, D. (1980). Measuring and assessing organizations. New York: Wiley Interscience.Google Scholar
- Van de Ven, A., & Garud, R. (1994). The co-evolution of technological and institutional innovations. In J. Singh & J. Baum (Eds.), Evolutionary dynamics of organizations (pp. 425–443). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Van de Ven, A., & Grazman, D. (1999). Evolution in a nested hierarchy: A genealogy of Twin-Cities health care organizations, 1953–1995. In J. Baum & B. McKelvey (Eds.), Variations in organization science: Perspectives in honor of Donald T. Campbell (pp. 185–212). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Van de Ven, A., & Jing, R. (2011). Indigenous management research in China from an engaged scholarship perspective. Management and Organization Review, 8(1), 123–137.Google Scholar
- Van de Ven, A., & Polley, D. (1992). Learning while innovating. Organization Science, 3(2), 92–116.Google Scholar
- Van de Ven, A., Polley, D., Garud, R., & Venkataraman, S. (1999). The innovation journey. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Van de Ven, A., & Sun, K. (2011). Breakdowns in models of organization change and development. Academy of Management Perspectives, 25(3), 58–74.Google Scholar
- Two excellent biographies of Van de Ven’s contributions to innovation theory have recently been published (Glee-Vermande 2016; Zahra 2016). Van de Ven and colleagues maintain a website dedicated to process research methods (www.processresearchmethods.org), and several of Van de Ven’s papers and books can be found in complete versions online (https://sites.google.com/a/umn.edu/avandeven/).