Advertisement

Andrew M. Pettigrew: A Groundbreaking Process Scholar

  • Harry Sminia
Living reference work entry

Later version available View entry history

Abstract

This chapter positions Andrew Pettigrew as a process scholar. It describes his work of catching “reality in flight” as he investigated the continuity and change, which is involved in subject areas like the politics of organizational decision-making, organizational culture, fundamental strategic change, human resource management, competitiveness, the workings of boards of directors, and new organizational forms. The chapter also describes the research methodology of contextualism that Andrew Pettigrew developed to capture “reality in flight.” It discusses the extent to which Andrew Pettigrew succeeded and how his research program could be developed further.

Keywords

Process Contextualism Strategic change Politics Impact 

References

  1. Anderson, P., & Tushman, M. L. (1990). Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: A cyclical model of technological change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 604–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  3. Barley, S. R., & Tolbert, P. S. (1997). Institutionalization and structuration: Studying the links between action and institution. Organization Studies, 18(1), 93–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Buchanan, D. A., & Boddy, D. (1992). The expertise of the change agent: Public performance and backstage activity. London: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  5. Bunker, B. B., & Alban, B. T. (1992). Editors’ introduction: The large group intervention – a new social innovation? Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 28(4), 473–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burgelman, R. A. (1983). A process model on internal corporate venturing in the diversified major firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 223–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Caldwell, R. (2005). Things fall apart? Discourses on agency and change in organizations. Human Relations, 58(1), 83–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chia, R., & MacKay, R. B. (2007). Post-processual challenges for the emerging strategy-as-practice perspective: Discovering strategy in the logic of practice. Human Relations, 60(1), 217–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cray, D., Mallory, G. R., Butler, J. E., Hickson, D. J., & Wilson, D. C. (1991). Explaining decision processes. Journal of Management Studies, 28(3), 227–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cyert, R. L., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  11. Dawson, P. (1994). Organizational change: A processual approach. London: Paul Chapman.Google Scholar
  12. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ferlie, E., & McNulty, T. (1997). “Going to market”: Changing patterns in the organization and character of process research. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 13(4), 367–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ferlie, E., Ashburner, L., Fitzgerald, L., & Pettigrew, A. M. (1996). The new public management in action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gawer, A., & Phillips, N. (2013). Institutional work as logics shift: The case of Intel’s transformation to platform leader. Organization Studies, 34(8), 1035–1071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Giddens, A. (1976). New rules of sociological method: A positive critique of interpretative sociologies. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
  17. Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory: Action, structure and contradiction in social analysis. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of a theory of structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  19. Greenwood, R., & Hinings, C. R. (1988). Organizational design types, tracks and the dynamics of strategic change. Organization Studies, 9(3), 293–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Greenwood, R., & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutional entrepreneurship in mature fields: The big five accounting firms. Academy of Management Journal, 49(1), 27–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hernes, T. (2014). A process theory of organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hirsch, P. M., & Lounsbury, M. (1997). Ending the family quarrel: Towards a reconciliation of “old” and “new” institutionalisms. American Behavoral Scientist, 40(4), 406–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jarzabkowski, P. A., & Spee, P. (2009). Strategy-as-practice: A review and future directions for the field. International Journal of Management Reviews, 11(1), 69–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Johnson, G. (1988). Rethinking incrementalism. Strategic Management Journal, 9, 75–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Johnson, G., Smith, S., & Codling, B. (2000). Microprocesses of institutional change in the context of privatization. Academy of Management Journal, 25(3), 572–580.Google Scholar
  26. Lawrence, T. B., Suddaby, R., & Leca, B. (2009). Introduction: Theorizing and studying institutional work. In T. Lawrence, R. Suddaby, & B. Leca (Eds.), Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organization (pp. 1–28). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Leblebici, H., Salancik, G. R., Copay, A., & King, T. (1991). Institutional change and the transformation of interorganizational fields: An organizational history of the US radio broadcasting industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 333–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lounsbury, M., & Crumley, E. T. (2007). New practice creation: An institutional perspective on innovation. Organization Studies, 28(7), 993–1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  30. McNulty, T., & Pettigrew, A. M. (1999). Strategists on the board. Organization Studies, 20(1), 47–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Morgan, G., & Sturdy, A. (2000). Beyond organizational change. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pepper, S. C. (1942). World hypothesis: A study in evidence. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  33. Pettigrew, A. M. (1970). A behavioural analysis of an innovative decision (Doctoral Dissertation, University of Manchester).Google Scholar
  34. Pettigrew, A. M. (1973). The politics of organizational decision making. London: Tavistock/Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
  35. Pettigrew, A. M. (1979). On studying organizational cultures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 570–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pettigrew, A. M. (1985a). The awakening giant: Continuity and change in ICI. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  37. Pettigrew, A. M. (1985b). Contextualist research and the study of organizational change processes. In E. Mumford (Ed.), Research methods in information systems (pp. 53–75). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  38. Pettigrew, A. M. (1985c). Contextualist research: A natural way to link theory and practice. In E. Lawler III, A. M. Mohrman Jr., S. A. Mohrman, G. E. Ledford Jr., T. G. Cummings, et al. (Eds.), Doing research that is useful in theory and practice (pp. 222–274). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  39. Pettigrew, A. M. (1987a). Context and action in the transformation of the firm. Journal of Management Studies, 24(6), 649–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pettigrew, A. M. (1987b). Researching strategic change. In A. M. Pettigrew (Ed.), The management of strategic change (pp. 1–13). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  41. Pettigrew, A. M. (1987c). Theoretical, methodological and empirical issues in studying change. Journal of Management Studies, 24(4), 420–426.Google Scholar
  42. Pettigrew, A. M. (Ed.). (1987d). The management of strategic change. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  43. Pettigrew, A. M. (1989). Longitudinal methods to study change: Theory and practice. In R. M. Mansfield (Ed.), New frontiers of management (pp. 21–49). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. Pettigrew, A. M. (1990). Longitudinal field research on change: Theory and practice. Organization Science, 1(3), 267–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pettigrew, A. M. (1992). The character and significance of strategy process research. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pettigrew, A. M. (1995). Longitudinal field research on change. In G. P. Huber & A. H. Van de Ven (Eds.), Longitudinal field research methods (pp. 91–125). San Francisco: Sage.Google Scholar
  47. Pettigrew, A. M. (1997a). The double hurdles for management research. In T. Clark (Ed.), Advancement in organizational behaviour: Essays in hounour of Derek S Pugh (pp. 277–296). London: Dartmouth Press.Google Scholar
  48. Pettigrew, A. M. (1997b). What is processual analysis? Scandinavian Journal of Management, 13(4), 337–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pettigrew, A. M. (1998). Catching reality in flight. In A. Bedeian (Ed.), Management laureates (pp. 171–206). Greenwich: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  50. Pettigrew, A. M. (2001). Management research after modernism. British Journal of Management, 12, S61–S70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pettigrew, A. M. (2003). Innovative forms of organizing: Progress, performance and process. In A. M. Pettigrew, R. Whittington, L. Melin, C. J. Sánchez-Runde, F. A. J. van den Bosch, W. Ruigrok, & T. Numagami (Eds.), Innovative forms of organizing (pp. 331–351). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  52. Pettigrew, A. M. (2005). The character and significance of management research on the public services. Academy of Management Journal, 48(6), 973–977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pettigrew, A. M. (2011). Scholarship with impact. British Journal of Management, 22, 347–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pettigrew, A. M. (2013). The conduct of qualitative research in organizational settings. Corporate Governance, 21(2), 123–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pettigrew, A. M., & Fenton, E. (Eds.). (2000). The innovating organization. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  56. Pettigrew, A. M., & Massini, S. (2003). Innovative forms of organizing: Trends in Europe, Japan and the USA in the 1990s. In A. M. Pettigrew, R. Whittington, L. Melin, C. J. Sánchez-Runde, F. A. J. van den Bosch, W. Ruigrok, & T. Numagami (Eds.), Innovative forms of organizing (pp. 1–32). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pettigrew, A. M., & McNulty, T. (1998). Sources and uses of power in the boardroom. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 7(2), 197–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pettigrew, A. M., & Whipp, R. (1991). Managing change for competitive success. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  59. Pettigrew, A. M., & Whipp, R. (1993). Managing the twin process of competition and change: The role of intangible assets. In P. Lorange, B. Chakravarthy, J. Roos, & A. H. Van de Ven (Eds.), Implementing strategic change processes (pp. 3–42). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  60. Pettigrew, A. M., Hendry, C., & Sparrow, P. R. (1990). Corporate strategy change and human resource management. Sheffield: The Department of Employment, Training Agency.Google Scholar
  61. Pettigrew, A. M., Ferlie, E., & McKee, L. (1992). Shaping strategic change: Making change in large organizations, the case of the NHS. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  62. Pettigrew, A. M., Thomas, H., & Whittington, R. (2002). Strategic management: The strengths and limitations of a field. In A. M. Pettigrew, H. Thomas, & R. Whittington (Eds.), Handbook of strategic management (pp. 3–29). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  63. Pettigrew, A. M., Whittington, R., Melin, L., Sànchez-Runde, C. J., van den Bosch, F. A. J., Ruigrok, W., & Numagami, T. (Eds.). (2003). Innovative forms of organizing. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  64. Pettigrew, A. M., Cornuel, E., & Hommel, U. (Eds.). (2014). The institutional development of business schools. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Rajagopalan, N., & Spreitzer, G. M. (1997). Toward a theory of strategic change: A multi-lens perspective and integrative framework. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 46–79.Google Scholar
  66. Schatzki, T. R. (2001). Introduction. In T. R. Schatzki, K. Knorr-Cetina, & E. von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 1–14). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  67. Schwarz, G. M., & Stensaker, I. G. (2014). Time to take of the theoretical straightjacket and (re-)introduce phenomenon-driven research. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 50(4), 478–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Sewell, W. H. (1992). A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 98(1), 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Sminia, H. (2005). Strategy formation as layered discussion. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 21, 267–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Sminia, H. (2016). Pioneering process research: Andrew Pettigrew’s contribution to management scholarship, 1962–2014. International Journal of Management Reviews, 18(2), 111–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Sminia, H., & de Rond, M. (2012). Context and action in the transformation of strategy scholarship. Journal of Management Studies, 49(7), 1329–1349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Sminia, H., & van Nistelrooij, A. (2006). Strategic management and organization development: Planned change in a public sector organization. Journal of Change Management, 6(1), 99–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Sztompka, P. (1991). Society in action: The theory of social becoming. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  74. Tsoukas, H., & Chia, R. (2002). On organizational becoming: Rethinking organizational change. Organization Science, 13(5), 567–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Van de Ven, A. H. (2007). Engaged scholarship: A guide for organizational and social research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  76. Van de Ven, A. H., & Poole, M. S. (1995). Explaining development and change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 510–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. van Nistelrooij, A., & Sminia, H. (2010). Organization development: What’s actually happening? Journal of Change Management, 10(4), 407–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Warmington, A., Lupton, T., & Gribbin, C. (1977). Organizational behaviour and performance: An open systems approach to change. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Whipp, R., & Pettigrew, A. M. (1992). Managing change for competitive success: Bridging the strategic and the operational. Industrial and Corporate Change, 1(1), 205–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Whipp, R., Rosenfeld, R., & Pettigrew, A. M. (1989a). Culture and competitiveness: Evidence from two mature UK industries. Journal of Management Studies, 26(6), 561–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Whipp, R., Rosenfeld, R., & Pettigrew, A. M. (1989b). Managing strategic change in a mature business. Long Range Planning, 22(6), 92–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Whittington, R. (1996). Strategy as practice. Long Range Planning, 29(5), 731–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Whittington, R. (2006). Completing the practice turn in strategy research. Organization Studies, 27(5), 613–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Whittington, R., Pettigrew, A. M., Peck, S., Fenton, E., & Conyon, M. (1999). Change and complementarities in the new competitive landscape: A European panel study, 1992–1996. Organization Science, 10(5), 583–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Willmott, R. (1997). Structure, culture and agency: Rejecting the current othodoxy of organization theory. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 27(1), 93–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Further Reading

  1. The best way to get to know Andrew Pettigrew’s work is to read it, with the list of references below providing the information when and where his books and articles have been published. To get ‘inside the man’, there are a few occasions where he reflected on his own work (Mintzberg, Waters, Pettigrew, & Butler, 1990; Pettigrew, 1998, 2001a, 2011b, 2012). Apart from that, concise introductions to his body of work can be found in Sminia (2009, 2016; Sminia & de Rond, 2012). Finally, two of his major publications, his dissertation project (Pettigrew, 1973b) and the ICI study (Pettigrew, 1985d) have been re-printed recently as Pettigrew (2001b) and (Pettigrew, 2011a) respectively.Google Scholar
  2. Mintzberg, H., Waters, J. A., Pettigrew, A. M., & Butler, R. J. (1990). Studying deciding: An exchange of views between Mintzberg and Waters, Pettigrew, and Butler. Organization Studies, 11(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Pettigrew, A. M. (2001). The politics of organizational decision-making (reprint ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Pettigrew, A. M. (2011). The awakening giant: Continuity and change in imperial chemical industries (reprint ed.). Abingdon: Routlegde.Google Scholar
  5. Pettigrew, A. M. (2012). Context and action in the transformation of the firm: A reprise. Journal of Management Studies, 49(7), 1304–1328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Sminia, H. (2009). Process research in strategy formation: Theory, methodology and relevance. International Journal of Management Reviews, 11(1), 97–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Strategy & OrganizationUniversity of Strathclyde Business SchoolGlasgowUK

Personalised recommendations