Advertisement

The Changing Role of the Corporate Trainer: The Shift from “Training” to “Talent Development”

  • William J. RothwellEmail author
  • Jae Young LeeEmail author
  • Patricia Macko
Living reference work entry

Abstract

This chapter explains a shift from training to talent development. Modern world trends such as changing workforce demographics, globalization, cutting-edge technology, lean environment, and knowledge-based society have influenced the role of learning in organizations and promoted to change a view of corporate training to talent development. As a comprehensive and continuous process, talent development is strategically aligned with organizational goals and develops people in an organization to meet current and future organizational needs. Because the role of talent development professional is different from the role of trainers, talent development leaders are requested to have different competencies. This chapter presents specific competencies required for talent development leaders.

Keywords

Corporate training Talent development Talent development professional, and competency 

References

  1. Arneson J, Rothwell W, Naughton J (2013) ASTD competency study: the training & development profession redefined. ASTD Press, AlexandriaGoogle Scholar
  2. Beck U (2015) What is globalization? Polity, MaldenGoogle Scholar
  3. Becker GS (1962) Investment in human capital: a theoretical analysis. J Polit Econ 70(5):9–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bingham T (2014) Talent development. Retrieved from https://www.td.org/insights/talent-development
  5. Caplan J (2013) Strategic talent development: develop and engage all your people for business success. Kogan Page, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  6. Drucker PF (1999) Management challenges of the 21st century. Harper, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Gallardo-Gallardo E, Dries N, González-Cruz TF (2013) What is the meaning of ‘talent’ in the world of work? Hum Resour Manag Rev 23(4):290–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gandz J (2006) Talent development: the architecture of a talent pipeline that works. Ivey Bus J 70(3):1–4Google Scholar
  9. Garavan TN, Carbery R, Rock A (2012) Mapping talent development: definition, scope and architecture. Eur J Train Dev 36(1):5–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Harrisr L, Foster C (2010) Aligning talent management with approaches to equality and diversity: challenges for UK public sector managers. Equal Divers Incl: Int J 29(5):422–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hines P, Holweg M, Rich N (2004) Learning to evolve: a review of contemporary lean thinking. Int J Oper Prod Manag 24(10):994–1011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kay J (2011) Obliquity: why our goals are best achieved indirectly. Profile Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. Lawler J (2014) Women are having fewer kids, and demographers don’t know why. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/women-are-having-fewer-kids-and-demographers-dont-know-why/article/2549445
  14. Lee M, Mather M (2008) US labor force trends. vol 63, no 2. Population Reference Bureau. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/681a/17f8de4f6818b003367f73a05f850f7fbc3b.pdf
  15. Mehdiabadi A, Li J (2016) Understanding talent development and implications for human resource development: an integrative literature review. Hum Resour Dev Rev 15(3):263–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mulder M (2017) Competence-based vocational and professional education. Springer, ChamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rothwell WJ (2015) Effective succession planning: ensuring leadership continuity and building talent from within, 5th edn. American Management Association, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Rothwell WJ, Zabarello A, Stopper A (2015) Building a talent development structure without borders. ATD, Alexandrea. Retrieved from https://www.td.org/research/building-a-talent-development-structureGoogle Scholar
  19. Spencer & Spencer (1993). Competence at work. New York: WileyGoogle Scholar
  20. Spence M (2011) The impact of globalization on income and employment: the downside of integrating markets. Foreign Aff:28–41Google Scholar
  21. White RW (1959) Motivation reconsidered: the concept of competence. Psychol Rev 66:297–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wikipedia (2018) Technology. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technology

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Learning & Performance SystemsThe Pennsylvania State UniversityState CollegeUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Michael Gessler
    • 1
  • Larissa Freund
    • 2
  • Susanne Peters
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute of Technology and EducationUniversity of BremenBremenGermany
  2. 2.University of BremenBremenGermany
  3. 3.University of BremenBremenGermany

Personalised recommendations