Encyclopedia of Couple and Family Therapy

2019 Edition
| Editors: Jay L. Lebow, Anthony L. Chambers, Douglas C. Breunlin

Romantic Disengagement

  • Robin A. BarryEmail author
  • Jennifer M. Lorenzo
  • Rupsha Singh
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49425-8_795

Name of Concept

Romantic disengagement

Synonyms

Disaffection*; Growing apart*; Indifference*; Marital disaffection*

Introduction

Romantic disengagement characterizes the extent to which an individual feels a general sense of psychological and physical distance from their romantic partner. More romantically disengaged individuals experience greater indifference toward their partner and relationship, evidence lower levels of attention to and interest in their partner, and engage in behaviors to increase physical and cognitive distance from their partner (Barry et al. 2008; Kayser 1993). Factor analyses suggest that romantic disengagement is a unique, albeit related, construct compared to high levels of negative and low levels of positive affect and behavior with the partner (Barry et al. 2008; Snyder and Regts 1982).

Theoretical Context for Concept

Most research on romantic disengagement and disaffection has been phenomenological in nature. Both qualitative and quantitative approaches...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Barry, R. A., Lawrence, E., & Langer, A. (2008). Conceptualization and assessment of disengagement in romantic relationships. Personal Relationships, 15, 297–315.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2008.00200.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Cordova, J. V. (2014). The Marriage Checkup practitioner’s guide: Promoting lifelong relationship health. Washington, DC: APA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Doherty, W. J., Harris, S. M., & Didericksen, K. W. (2016). A typology of attitudes toward proceeding with divorce among parents in the divorce process. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 56, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hahlweg, K., Schindler, L., Revenstorf, D., & Brengelmann, J. C. (1984). The Munich marital therapy study. In K. Hahlweg & N. S. Jacobson (Eds.), Marital interaction: Analysis and modification (pp. 3–26). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  5. Hawkins, A. J., Willoughby, B. J., & Doherty, W. J. (2012). Reasons for divorce and openness to marital reconciliation. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 53, 453–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Herrington, R. L., Mitchell, A. E., Castellani, A. M., Joseph, J. I., Snyder, D. K., & Gleaves, D. H. (2008). Assessing disharmony and disaffection in intimate relationships: Revision of the Marital Satisfaction Inventory factor scales. Psychological Assessment, 20, 341–350.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Jacobson, N. S., & Christensen, A. (1996). Acceptance and change in couple therapy: A therapist’s guide to transforming relationships. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  8. Johnson, S. M. (2004). The practice of Emotionally Focused Couple Therapy: Creating connection (2nd ed). New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  9. Kayser, K. (1993). When love dies: The process of marital disaffection. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  10. Snyder, D. K., & Regts, J. M. (1982). Factor scales for assessing marital disharmony and disaffection. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50, 736–743.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.50.5.736.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Whisman, M. A., Dixon, A. E., & Johnson, B. (1997). Therapists’ perspectives of couple problems and treatment issues in couple therapy. Journal of Family Psychology, 11, 361–366.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.11.3.361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robin A. Barry
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jennifer M. Lorenzo
    • 2
  • Rupsha Singh
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of WyomingLaramieUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore CountryBaltimoreUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Brian Baucom
    • 1
  1. 1.University of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA