Encyclopedia of Couple and Family Therapy

2019 Edition
| Editors: Jay L. Lebow, Anthony L. Chambers, Douglas C. Breunlin

Marriage

  • Jared DurtschiEmail author
  • Cameron Brown
  • Austin Beck
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49425-8_503

Synonyms

Civil union; Couple; Matrimony; Partnership; Relationship; Union; Wedding; Wedlock

Introduction

Options for romantic relationships are at an all-time high in the Westernized world. Couples now commonly date, cohabitate, and marry in heterosexual or same-sex relationships, with varying levels of agreed upon commitment (monogamous or polyamorous). However, legal marriage remains a valued goal for the majority, although there is substantial diversity in ideals around preferred types of relationships. Marriage is a highly sought after goal for many who long for a close relationship with another person to share their life with. The perceived value of marriage has gone up in recent decades, as it has been historically denied to some (e.g., interracial marriage, same-sex marriage), and as many prefer to wait until they have completed their education or are financially independent before they feel prepared for marriage. This has become especially salient among lower-income couples who...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Amato, P. R. (2010). Research on divorce: Continuing trends and new developments. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 650–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blow, A. J., & Hartnett, K. (2005). Infidelity in committed relationships II: A substantive review. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 31, 217–233.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cherlin, A. J. (2010). Demographic trends in the United States: A review of research in the 2000s. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 403–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Christopher, F. S., & Sprecher, S. (2000). Sexuality in marriage, dating, and other relationships: A decade review. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 999–1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Desmarais, S. L., Reeves, K. A., Nicholls, T. L., Telford, R., & Fiebert, M. S. (2012). Prevalence of physical violence in intimate relationships: Part 1. Rates of male and female victimization. Partner Abuse, 3, 140–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fincham, F. D., & Beach, S. R. H. (2010). Marriage in the new millennium: A decade in review. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 630–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., & Newton, T. L. (2001). Marriage and health: His and hers. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 472–503.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lundberg, S., & Pollak, R. A. (2015). The evolving role of marriage: 1950 –2010. The Future of Children, 25(2), 29–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. McNulty, J. K. (2010). When positive processes hurt relationships. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 167–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Stith, S. M., Smith, D. B., Penn, C. E., Ward, D. B., & Tritt, D. (2004). Intimate partner physical abuse perpetration and victimization risk factors: A meta-analytic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 10, 65–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Vossler, A. (2016). Internet infidelity 10 years on: A critical review of the literature. The Family Journal: Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Families, 24, 359–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Waite, L. J., & Lehrer, E. L. (2003). The benefits from marriage and religion in the United States: A comparative analysis. Population and Development Review, 2, 255–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Walker, A. (2004). A symposium on marriage and its future. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 843–847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Whisman, M. A., & Snyder, D. K. (2007). Sexual infidelity in a national survey of American women: Differences in prevalence and correlates as a function of method of assessment. Journal of Family Psychology, 21, 147–154.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Wilcox, W. B., Wolfinger, N. H., & Stokes, C. E. (2015). One nation, divided: Culture, civic institutions, and the marriage divide. The Future of Children, 25(2), 111–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Wolfinger, N. H. (2015, July 20). Replicating the Goldilocks theory of marriage and divorce. Family Studies. Retrieved from http://family-studies.org/replicating-the-goldilocks-theory-of-marriage-and-divorce/
  17. Wolfinger, N. H., & Wilcox, W. B. (2008). Happily ever after? Religion, marital status, gender, and relationship quality in urban families. Social Forces, 86, 1311–1337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kansas State UniversityManhattanUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Mudita Rastogi
    • 1
  1. 1.Illinois School of Professional Psychology, Argosy UniversitySchaumburgUSA