Encyclopedia of Couple and Family Therapy

2019 Edition
| Editors: Jay L. Lebow, Anthony L. Chambers, Douglas C. Breunlin

Structural Equation Modeling in Couple and Family Research

  • Joanna HerresEmail author
  • Quintin Hunt
  • Guy S. Diamond
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49425-8_411

Name of Concept

Structural Equation Modeling in Couple and Family Research

Introduction

Theories about couples and families focus us beyond simple relationships between variables to more complicated models that take into account direct and indirect relationships. The study of couple and family therapy process in particular tests theories about how therapy improves outcomes through some mediating variable. For example, improvement in the parent/child attachment relationship is considered an important mechanism of change in family therapy for adolescent depression (Kobak et al. 2015). According to attachment theory, family therapy reduces depressive symptoms through improvement in the parent/child relationship (the mediator). Structural equation modeling (SEM) provides a single statistical method of testing mediation models, as long as the necessary conditions are satisfied (e.g., temporal precedence and third variable controls).

Description

SEM refers to a statistical method used to...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Arbuckle, J. (2003). Amos 5.0 update to the Amos user’s guide. Marketing Department, SPSS Incorporated.Google Scholar
  2. IBM Corp. Released. (2013). IBM SPSS statistics for windows, version 22.0. IBM Corp: Armonk.Google Scholar
  3. Johnson, L. N., Tambling, R. B., Mennenga, K. D., Ketring, S. A., Oka, M., Anderson, S. R., … & Miller, R. B. (2015). Examining attachment avoidance and attachment anxiety across eight sessions of couple therapy. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 42, 195–212.Google Scholar
  4. Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Publications.Google Scholar
  5. Kobak, R., Zajak, K., Herres, J., & Krauthamer-Ewing, E. S. (2015). Attachment based treatments for adolescents: The secure cycle as a framework for assessment, treatment and evaluation. Attachment and Human Development, 17, 220–239.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. (2010). Mplus. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
  7. SAS Institute Inc. (2011). Base SAS® 9.3 Procedures Guide. Cary: SAS Institute.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The College of New JerseyEwing TownshipUSA
  2. 2.Center for Family Intervention, Drexel UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Heather Pederson
    • 1
  • Diana Semmelhack
    • 2
  1. 1.Council for RelationshipsPhiladelphiaUSA
  2. 2.Midwestern UniversityDowners GroveUSA