Encyclopedia of Couple and Family Therapy

2019 Edition
| Editors: Jay L. Lebow, Anthony L. Chambers, Douglas C. Breunlin

System in Family Systems Theory

  • William P. RussellEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49425-8_311

Name of Concept

System

Introduction

Prior to the advent of couple and family therapy, the fields of psychoanalysis and psychotherapy convened sessions with an individual client and characterized therapy in terms of producing change in the individual. Social work prefigured the family therapy approach by focusing social diagnosis on the person-in-environment and establishing principles for intervention with the individual and the social context (Richmond 1917) but did not provide a theory to explain problem formation and problem resolution within a social context. Similarly, by the mid-twentieth century, other forbearers of family therapy – including marriage counselors, child guidance professionals, and some psychiatrists – were intervening with multiple family members (Nichols and Davis 2017) but did not have a theory of the family system to guide intervention.

In the 1950s, early family therapy theorists began to utilize systems theory, developed in the fields of engineering and...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Bateson, G., Jackson, D. D., Haley, J., & Weakland, J. (1956). Towards a theory of schizophrenia. Behavioral Science, 1, 251–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boyd-Franklin, N. (1993). Race, class and poverty. In F. Walsh (Ed.), Normal family processes. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  3. Breunlin, D. C., Schwartz, R., & Mac Kune-Karrer, B. (1992). Metaframeworks: Transcending the models of family therapy. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  4. Breunlin, D. C., Pinsof, W., Russell, W. P., & Lebow, J. (2011). Integrative problem centered metaframeworks (IPCM) therapy I: Core concepts and hypothesizing. Family Process, 50(3), 293–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Falicov, C. (1983). Cultural perspectives in family therapy. Rockville: Aspen Systems.Google Scholar
  6. Goldner, V. (1985). Feminism and family therapy. Family Process, 24, 31–47.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Jackson, D. D., & Weakland, J. H. (1959). Schizophrenic symptoms and family interaction. Archives of General Psychiatry, 1, 618–621.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Minuchin, S. (1974). Families and family therapy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard university Press.Google Scholar
  9. Nichols, M. P., & Davis, S. D. (2017). Family therapy: Concepts and methods (11th ed.). Boston: Pearson.Google Scholar
  10. Pinsof, W. (1995). Problem centered therapy: A synthesis of family, individual, and biological therapies. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  11. Richmond, M. E. (1917). Social Diagnosis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Russell, W. P., Pinsof, W., Breunlin, D. C., & Lebow, J. (2016). In T. L. Sexton & J. Lebow (Eds.), Handbook of family therapy (4th ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General systems theory: Foundations, development, applications. New York: Braziller.Google Scholar
  14. Von Foerster, H. (1981). Observing systems. Seaside: Intersystems Publications.Google Scholar
  15. Wiener, N. (1948). Cybernetics or control and communication in the animal and the machine. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Family Institute at Northwestern UniversityEvanstonUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Eli Karam
    • 1
  1. 1.University of LouisvilleLouisvilleUSA