Encyclopedia of Couple and Family Therapy

2019 Edition
| Editors: Jay L. Lebow, Anthony L. Chambers, Douglas C. Breunlin

Family Rules

  • Samuel ShannonEmail author
  • Jana Sutton
  • Bethany Simmons
  • Eugene Holowacz
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49425-8_268

Name of Concept

Family Rules

Introduction

Rules permeate all interactions and are an inevitable part of human relations. They provide structure and prompt individuals and systems to operate in predictable patterns. For example, the writers were provided guidelines while creating this entry. While these guidelines allowed for clarity, they also compelled the authors to adapt the entry so that it may fit into what was expected. In a similar fashion, families and individuals organize themselves around familial rules. Therefore, to truly understand a familial interaction is to understand the rules that are present.

All living organisms tend to organize in understandable ways, follow redundant patterns, and follow rules (Haley 1987). To better understand how a family operates, family patterns can be abstracted to create a roadmap for identifying family functioning (Jackson 1965a). All families have rules and rules about rules. Thus, families tend toward organization. Some rules are...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Feinauer, I. D., Larson, J. H., & Harper, J. M. (2010). Implicit family process rules and adolescent psychological symptoms. American Journal of Family Therapy, 38(1), 63–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ford, F. R. (1983). Rules: The invisible family. Family Process, 22(2), 135–145.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Gillett, K. S., Harper, J. M., Larson, J. H., Berrett, M. E., & Hardman, R. K. (2009). Implicit family process rules in eating-disordered and non-eating- disordered families. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 35(2), 159–174.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Haley, J. (1987). Problem-solving therapy (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  5. Jackson, D. (1965a). The study of the family. Family Process, 4(1), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Jackson, D. (1965b). Family rules: Marital quid pro quo. Archives of General Psychiatry, 12(6), 589–594.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Keeney, B. P. (1983). Aesthetics of change (Revised ed.). New York: Guilford Publications.Google Scholar
  8. Palazzoli-Selvini, M., Boscolo, L., Cecchin, G., & Prata, G. (1980). Hypothesizing-circularity-neutrality: Three guidelines for the conductor of the session. Family Process, 19(1), 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General system theory: Foundations, development, applications (Revised ed.). New York: George Braziller Inc.Google Scholar
  10. Watzlawick, P., Bavelas, J. B., & Jackson, D. D. (1967). Pragmatics of human communication: A study of interactional patterns, pathologies and paradoxes. New York: WW Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  11. Weakland, J. H., Fisch, R., Watzlawick, P., & Bodin, A. M. (1974). Brief therapy: Focused problem resolution. Family Process, 13(2), 141–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Samuel Shannon
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jana Sutton
    • 1
  • Bethany Simmons
    • 2
  • Eugene Holowacz
    • 3
  1. 1.University of Louisiana MonroeMonroeUSA
  2. 2.California Lutheran UniversityThousand OaksUSA
  3. 3.The Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • David Kearns
    • 1
  • Bahareh Sahebi
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Family MedicineUniversity of IowaIowa CityUSA
  2. 2.The Family Institute at Northwestern UniversityEvanstonUSA