Encyclopedia of Couple and Family Therapy

2019 Edition
| Editors: Jay L. Lebow, Anthony L. Chambers, Douglas C. Breunlin

Boundaries in Structural Family Therapy

  • Richard HolmEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49425-8_246

Introduction

“Boundary Definition” according to Davidson (1983) was one of the most important concepts of General Systems Theory. It provided an inclusive contextual view that was expansive enough to include the significant factors relevant for understanding a particular organism or entity (p. 33). Minuchin (1974) viewed the family and its subsystems as circumscribed by boundaries.

Theoretical Context for Concept

Boundaries are the “rules defining who participates and how.” (Ibid., p. 53). Their function is “to protect the differentiation of the system. Every family subsystem has specific functions and makes specific demands on its members, and the development of interpersonal skills achieved in these subsystems is predicated on the subsystems freedom from interferences by other subsystems” (Ibid., pp. 53–54). Boundary permeability will therefore affect family functioning.

Description

First described boundaries in the family as enmeshed or disengaged. Later (1974) he applied these...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Colapinto, J. (1995). Dilution of family process in social services: Implications for treatment of neglectful families. Family Process, 34, 59–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Davidson, M. (1983). Uncommon sense: The life and thought of Ludwig von Bertalannffy (1901–1972), father of general systems theory. Los Angeles: J. P. Tarcher, Inc.Google Scholar
  3. Minuchin, S. (1974). Families and family therapy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Minuchin, S., & Fishman, H. C. (1981). Family therapy techniques. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Minuchin, S. (1984). Family kaleidoscope. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Minuchin, S., Montalvo, B., Guerney, B. L., & Schumer, F. (1967). Families of the slums. New York: Basic.Google Scholar
  7. Minuchin, S., Rosman, B. L., & Baker, L. (1978). Psychosomatic families: Anorexia nervosa in context. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Minuchin, S., Simon, G. M., & Lee, W. Y. (1996; 2006, 2nd ed.). Mastering family therapy: Journeys of Growth and Transformation. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  9. Minuchin, P., Colapinto, J., & Minuchin, S. (1998; 2007, 2nd ed.). Working with families of the poor. New York: Guildford.Google Scholar
  10. Minuchin, S., Nichols, M. P., & Lee, W. Y. (2007). Assessing families and couples: From symptom to system. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  11. Minuchin, S., Reiter, M., & Borda, C. (2014). The craft of family therapy: Challenging certainties. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Simon, G. M. (2015). Structural couple therapy. In A. S. Gurman (Ed.), Clinical handbook of couple therapy (5th ed., pp. 358–384). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Minuchin Center for the FamilyWoodburyUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • David Kearns
    • 1
  • Bahareh Sahebi
    • 2
  1. 1.Iowa CityUSA
  2. 2.The Family Institute at Northwestern UniversityEvanstonUSA