Encyclopedia of Couple and Family Therapy

2019 Edition
| Editors: Jay L. Lebow, Anthony L. Chambers, Douglas C. Breunlin

Sefydliad y Teulu ∣ The Family Institute

Sefydliad y Teulu, Cymru ∣ The Family Institute, Wales
  • Mary MorrisEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49425-8_1128

Writing this chapter has been both an honor and a challenge. There are many people who have contributed to the shaping of the Family Institute and to the development of family therapy in the UK, and it will be impossible to do justice to all their contributions. The Family Institute has touched the lives of many people – staff, students, colleagues, and clients – in ways which have been immensely positive and transformative. The story of the Family Institute as constructed here is just one story, drawing on memories and written accounts but nevertheless only one way of telling the story of the Family Institute.

Early Days and Theoretical Roots

In true ecological and interactional style, what became known as the Family Institute, Cardiff (subsequently Wales), evolved out of conversations and connections between several mental health professionals working in South Wales, UK. Significant among those were Harvey Jones (1934–1983), Consultant Psychiatrist, and Mary Brueton, Psychiatric...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Andersen, T. (1987). The reflecting team: Dialogue and meta-dialogue in clinical work. Family Process, 26, 415–428.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bateson, G. (1979). Mind and nature. A necessary Unity. New York: Dutton.Google Scholar
  3. Breunlin, D. C., & Cade, B. (1981). Intervening in family systems with observer messages. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 7(4), 453–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burnham, J. (1999). Approach, method, technique: Making distinctions and creating connections. Human Systems: The Journal of Systemic Consultation and Management, 3(1), 3–26.Google Scholar
  5. Cade, B. W., Speed, B., & Seligman, P. M. (1986). Working in teams: The pros and cons. In F. W. Kaslow (Ed.), Supervision and training: Models, dilemmas and challenges. New York: Haworth Press.Google Scholar
  6. Cecchin, G., Ray, W. A., & Lane, G. (1992). Irreverence: A strategy for therapists’ survival. London: Karnac.Google Scholar
  7. Dallos, R., & Draper, R. (2000). An introduction to family therapy. Systemic theory and practice. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Dowling, E., Cade, B., Breunlin, D. C., Frude, N., & Seligman, P. (1982). A retrospective survey of students’ views on a family therapy training program. Journal of Family Therapy, 4(1), 61–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Faris, A., & Faris, J. (2016). Complexity and humanitarian crisis in Greece: First hand experience and analysis in Lesvos and Pireaus. Human Systems, 27(3), 187–199. Special edition on migration.Google Scholar
  10. Hardy, W. (2016). Chap 14. Working systemically with families in mind. In N. Evans & B. Hannigan (Eds.), Therapeutic skills for mental health nurses (pp. 181–191). London: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Hardy, W., Cox, B., Faris, J., & Vivian-Byrne, K. (2005). Excuse me, Gianfranco you left this behind…: some ideas and influences. Human Systems: The Journal of Therapy Consultation and Training, 16, 95–104.Google Scholar
  12. Heron, J. (1996). Co-operative inquiry: Research into the human condition. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  13. Jones, E. (1993). Family systems therapy: Developments in the Milan-systemic therapies. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  14. Jones, E. (1998). A feminist systemic therapy? In I. Bruna Seu & M. Colleen Heenan (Eds.), Feminism and psychotherapy. Reflections on contemporary theories and practices. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Jones, E. (2011). Highlights. Context, 115, 61–62.Google Scholar
  16. Marshall, J. (1999). Living life as inquiry. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 12(2), 155–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Morris, M. & Davies, A. (2018, forthcoming). Being both researcher and subject: Attending to emotion within a collaborative inquiry. In T. Loughran, & D. Mannay (Eds.), Emotion and the researcher: Sites, subjectivities and relationships (Vol. 16). Studies in qualitative methodology (pp. 229–244). Bingley: Emerald.Google Scholar
  18. Morris, M., Hardy, B., Vivian-Byrne, K., & Faris, J. (2014) No fit state – Working on the edge of boundaries. Workshop presentation at the Taos Institute conference, beyond the therapeutic state, University of Drammen, NorwayGoogle Scholar
  19. Pearce, W. B. (2007). Making social worlds. A communication perspective. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  20. Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. New York: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  21. Skynner R., & P. (1980, May). Report on Cardiff family institute. AAMFT Newsletter.Google Scholar
  22. Speed, B. (1985). Evaluating the Milan approach. In D. Campbell & R. Draper (Eds.), Applications of systemic family therapy, the Milan approach (pp. 259–271). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  23. Vivian-Byrne, K., & Hunt, J. (2014). Ethical decision making – Social metaphors towards ethical action. Journal of Systemic Therapies, 33(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Walrond-Skinner, S. (1976). Family therapy the treatment of natural systems. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  25. Walrond-Skinner, S. (2011). Some personal memories of the beginning of family therapy in the UK. Context, 115, 18–20.Google Scholar
  26. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wilson, J. (1998). Child-focused practice: A collaborative systemic approach (systemic thinking & practice). London: Karnac.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Family Institute, Faculty of Life Sciences and EducationUniversity of South WalesPontypriddUK

Section editors and affiliations

  • Douglas C. Breunlin
    • 1
  1. 1.The Family InstituteNorthwestern UniversityChicagoUSA