Encyclopedia of Animal Cognition and Behavior

Living Edition
| Editors: Jennifer Vonk, Todd Shackelford

Squamata Diet

  • Robert L. HillEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47829-6_95-1

Synonyms

Introduction

Of the currently extant nonavian Reptilia, the order Squamata is by far the largest. At the time of this writing, this order is represented by 10,221 described species. This group includes some of the most recognizable of reptiles, the lizards and snakes. Within the lizards, diets vary widely from strict herbivores to purely carnivorous forms. Some well-known examples on either end of the spectrum are the iguanas in the family Iguanidae (herbivores) and the generally large, among lizards, carnivorous (or mostly so) monitor lizards (family Varanidae). The Serpentes (snakes) are all some variation of carnivore (insectivorous, oophagous, carnivorous), with most having lightly constructed skulls that appear to be formed by series of struts and ligaments that allow for the consumption of prey larger than the size of their heads in a number of taxa. Most famously, this skull construction allows snakes like the giant boas and pythons to swallow prey as...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Campbell, J. A. (1998). Amphibians and reptiles of northern Guatemala, the Yucatan, and Belize. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
  2. Cogger, H. G. (1994). Reptiles and amphibians of Australia. Chatswood/Ithaca: Reed Books/Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Gibbons, W., Greene, J., & Mills, T. (2009). Lizards and crocodilians of the Southeast. University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
  4. Graham Reynolds, R., & Henderson, R. W. (2018). Boas of the world (superfamily Booidae): A checklist with systematic, taxonomic, and conservation assessments. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard College, 162, 1–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Greene, H. W. (1997). Snakes: The evolution of mystery in nature. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  6. Hampton, P. M. (2018). Morphological indicators of gape size for red-tailed pipe snakes (Cylindrophis ruffus). Journal of Herpetology, 52, 425–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Henderson, R. W., & Powell, R. (Eds.). (2007). Biology of the boas and pythons. Eagle Mountain: Eagle Mountain Publishing LC.Google Scholar
  8. Jones, L. L. C., & Lovich, R. E. (2009). Lizards of the American southwest: A photographic field guide. Tucson: Rio Nuevo Publishers.Google Scholar
  9. Kearney, M. (2003). Diet in the amphisbaenian Bipes biporus. Journal of Herpetology, 37, 404–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lemos-Espinal, J. A., Smith, G. R., & Ballinger, R. E. (2003). Diets of three species of knob-scaled lizards (genus Xenosaurus) from Mexico. The Southwestern Naturalist, 48, 119–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. López, P., Martín, J., & Salvador, A. (1991). Diet selection by the amphisbaenian Blanus cinereus. Herpetologica, 47, 210–218.Google Scholar
  12. Losos, J. B. 2009. Lizards in an evolutionary tree: Ecology and adaptive radiation of anoles. University of California Press. Berkeley/Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  13. Martin, J., Ortega, J., López, P., Pérez-Cembranos, A., & Pérez-Mellado, V. (2013). Fossorial life does not constrain diet selection in the amphisbaenian Trogonophis wiegmanni. Journal of Zoology, 291, 226–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Paterson, E. (2018). The diet of African house snakes (Boaedon spp) revealed by citizen science. The Herpetological Bulletin, 143, 29–30.Google Scholar
  15. Pianka, E. R., & Vitt, L. J. (2003). Lizards: Windows to the evolution of diversity. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  16. Pyron, R. A., Burbrink, F. T., & Wiens, J. J. (2013). A phylogeny and revised classification of Squamata, including 4161 species of lizards and snakes. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 13, 93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Richards, D. P., Barlow, A., & Wüster, W. (2012). Venom lethality and diet: Differential responses of natural prey and model organisms to the venom of the saw-scaled vipers (Echis). Toxicon, 59, 110–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Savage, J. M. (2002). The amphibians and reptiles of Costa Rica: A herpetofauna between two continents, between two seas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  19. Savitzky, A. H. (1981). Hinged teeth in snakes: An adaptation for swallowing hard-bodied prey. Science, 212, 346–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schuett, G. W., Hoggren, M., Douglas, M. E., & Greene, H. (Eds.). (2002). Biology of the vipers. Eagle Mountain: Eagle Mountain Publishing.Google Scholar
  21. Seufer, H., Kaverkin, Y., & Kirschner, A. (Eds.). (2005). The eyelash geckos: Care, breeding, and natural history. Karlsruhe: Kirschner and Seufer Verlag.Google Scholar
  22. Shine, R. (1986). Sexual differences in morphology and niche utilization in an aquatic snake, Acrochordus arafurae. Oecologica, 69, 260–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Webber, M. W., Jezkova, T., & Rodriguez-Robles, J. A. (2016). Feeding ecology of the sidewinder rattlesnakes (Viperidae). Herpetologica, 72, 324–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Zoo AtlantaAtlantaUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Alexis Garland
    • 1
  1. 1.Ruhr UniversityBochumGermany