Encyclopedia of Animal Cognition and Behavior

Living Edition
| Editors: Jennifer Vonk, Todd Shackelford

Parsimony

  • Swati MishraEmail author
  • Anubhav Pradeep
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47829-6_496-1

Synonyms

Definition

Parsimony is a principle used as a means of keeping explanations as simple as possible by providing the simplest of explanations to describe an observation or an understanding.

Introduction

Behavior is the way in which a living organism reacts to a particular situation. In psychology, behavior is thought of as an organism’s external reactions to its environmental stimuli. The analysis of behavior is a science based on the foundations and principles of behaviorism. It can be said that behavior is that particular response of an organism which reflects the kind of stimuli received from the environment. This behavior may be modified by using either positive or negative or manipulating reinforcements from the organism’s environment or according to self-directed intentions or impulses. Human behavior is more complex than animal. Society and culture plays a vital role in shaping human behavior although it is difficult to quantify the extent to...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Anderson, J. R. (1978). Arguments concerning representations for mental imagery. Psychological Review, 85, 249–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Breed, M., & Sanchez, L. (2010). Both environment and genetic makeup influence behavior. Nature Education Knowledge, 3, 10–68.Google Scholar
  3. Epstein, R. (1984). The principle of parsimony and some applications in psychology. The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 5, 119–130.Google Scholar
  4. Epstein, R., & Medalie, S. M. (1983). The spontaneous use of a tool by a pigeon. Behaviour Analysis Letters, 3, 241–247.Google Scholar
  5. Mach, E. (1960). The science of mechanics: A critical and historical account of its development (6th English ed.). LaSalle: Open Court. (1st English ed., 1893).Google Scholar
  6. Phillips D. C., & Soltis J. F. (1998). Perspectives on learning, Chapter 3. Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  7. Powell, J., Blakeley, D. W., & Powell, T. (Eds.). (2001). Biographical dictionary of literary influences: The nineteenth century, 1800–1914. Westport: Greenwood Publishing Group. Pavlov, Ivan Petrovich (1849–1936).Google Scholar
  8. Skinner, B. F. (1977). Why I am not a cognitive psychologist. Behaviorism, 5, 1–10.Google Scholar
  9. Sober, E. (1994). Let’s Razor Occam’s Razor. Knowles Dudley (Ed.), Explanation and it’s Limits. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Sober, E., & Lewontin, R. C. (1982). Artifact, cause and genic selection. Philosophy of Science, 49, 159–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Thorndike, E. L. (1911). Animal intelligence. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  12. Walsh, D. (1979). Occam’s razor: A principle of intellectual elegance. American Philosophical Quarterly, 16, 241–244.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Banaras Hindu universityVaranasiIndia
  2. 2.University of Illinois at ChicagoChicagoUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Douglas Sellers
    • 1
  1. 1.Penn State Worthington ScrantonScrantonUSA