Skip to main content

Ornamentation

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Animal Cognition and Behavior
  • 178 Accesses

Definition

A trait used to attract the opposite sex during mate choice.

Introduction

Many animals exhibit conspicuous characteristics such as brightly colored body regions or exaggerated physical structures. When these traits function during mate choice to increase the likelihood of their bearer attracting a mate, they are referred to as ornaments. The quintessential example of an ornament is the peacock’s tail: consisting of bright colors and patterns, and enlarged far beyond the relatively small tails of peahens, peacocks’ tails are presented to females during mating displays. Peahens then accept or reject a male based in part on his tail characteristics (Petrie et al. 1991). Ornaments are often sexually dimorphic, with one sex ornamented and the other not, but mutual ornamentation is also observed (Andersson 1994).

Ornamentation is linked to reproductive success, with individuals that display more elaborate ornaments enjoying a selective advantage. Ornamentations are therefore...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Andersson, M. (1994). Sexual selection. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, M., & Simmons, L. W. (2006). Sexual selection and mate choice. TRENDS in Ecology and Evolution, 21, 297–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock, T. (2007). Sexual selection in males and females. Science, 38, 1882–1885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. London: John Murray, Albemarle Street.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, S. E., Gratten, J., Berenos, C., Pilkington, J. G., Clutton-Brock, T. H., Pemberton, J. M., & Slate, J. (2013). Life history trade-offs at a single locus maintain sexually selected genetic variation. Nature, 502, 93–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, M., & Ryan, M. J. (1991). The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek. Nature, 350, 33–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrie, M., Halliday, T., & Sanders, C. (1991). Peahens prefer peacocks with elaborate trains. Animal Behaviour, 41, 323–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, L., & Houle, D. (1996). The lek paradox and the capture of genetic variance by condition dependent traits. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences, 263, 1415–1421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, M. J. (1998). Sexual selection, receiver biases, and the evolution of sex differences. Science, 281, 1999–2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Számadó, S. (2011). The costs of honesty and the fallacy of the handicap principle. Animal Behaviour, 81, 3–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandra Winters .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Winters, S. (2018). Ornamentation. In: Vonk, J., Shackelford, T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Animal Cognition and Behavior. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47829-6_315-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47829-6_315-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47829-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47829-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics