Skip to main content

Canine Communication

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Animal Cognition and Behavior

Synonyms

Dog communication

Definition

Dogs may communicate with conspecifics, humans, and other domestic animals they live with. When they communicate, they use visual, auditory, olfactory, and tactile signals. Domestication has greatly changed dogs’ physical appearance, and therefore, visual communication may not be equally important for dogs as for their wild relatives. Whereas some messages may be important for recognition and signaling in close proximity, others are broadcasted for long-distance communication.

Introduction

Between the carnivores, dogs and their ancestor, wolves, can be considered as the most social. Therefore, they develop an effective communication system with an abundant number of signals to maintain cohesion of the group, no matter if that is wolf pack, human family, or a group of feral dogs (e.g., Bradshaw and Nott 1995; Feddersen-Petersen 2007). For communication and recognition in close proximity, they can use body language, body odor, touch, and certain...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adams, G. J., & Johnson, K. G. (1994). Behavioural responses to barking and other auditory stimuli during night-time sleeping and waking in the domestic dog. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 39, 151–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaver, B. V. (2009). Canine behavior: Insights and answers (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: Saunders – Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekoff, M. (1977). Social communication in canids: Evidence for the evolution of a stereotyped mammalian display. Science, 197, 1097–1099.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bekoff, M. (1979). Ground scratching by male domestic dogs: A composite signal. Journal of Mammalogy, 60, 847–848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bekoff, M. (2001). Observations of scent-marking and discriminating self from others by a domestic dog (Canis familiaris): Tales of displaced yellow snow. Behavioural Processes, 55, 75–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boitani, L., & Ciucci, P. (1995). Comparative social ecology of feral dogs and wolves. Ethology Ecology and Evolution, 7, 49–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw, J. W. S., & Nott, H. M. R. (1995). Social and communication behaviour of companion dogs. In J. Serpell (Ed.), The domestic dog: Its evolution, behaviour and interactions with people (pp. 115–130). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bubna-Littitz, H. (2007). Sensory physiology and dog behaviour. In P. Jensen (Ed.), The behavioural biology of dogs (pp. 105–119). Oxfordshire: CAB International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Case, L. P. (2010). Canine and feline behavior and training: A complete guide to understanding our two best friends. Clifton Park: Delmar, Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coppola, C. L., Enns, R. M., & Grandin, T. (2006). Noise in the animal shelter environment: Building design and the effect of daily noise exposure. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 9, 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faragó, T., Pongrácz, P., Range, F., Virányi, Z., & Miklósi, Á. (2010a). The bone is mine’: Affective and referential aspects of dog growls. Animal Behaviour, 79, 917–925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faragó, T., Pongrácz, P., Miklósi, Á., Huber, L., Virányi, Z., & Range, F. (2010b). Dogs’ expectation about signalers’ body size by virtue of their growls. PLoS One, 5, e15175, 1–e15175, 8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feddersen-Petersen, D. U. (2007). Social behaviour of dogs and related canids. In P. Jensen (Ed.), The behavioural biology of dogs (pp. 105–119). Oxfordshire: CAB International.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, M. W. (1971). Behaviour of wolves, dogs and related canids. London: Jonathan Cape Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz, A. (2008). Attention to attention in domestic dog (Canis familiaris) dyadic play. Animal Cognition, 12, 107–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz, A. (2017). Smelling themselves: Dogs investigate their own odours longer when modified in an “olfactory mirror” test. Behavioural Processes, 143, 17–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaminski, J., & Nitzschner, M. (2013). Do dogs get the point? A review of dog–human communication ability. Learning and Motivation, 44, 294–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landsberg, G., Hunthausen, W., & Ackerman, I. (2003). Handbook of behaviour problems of the dog and cat (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: Saunders, Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maros, K., Pongrácz, P., Bárdos, G., Molnár, C., Faragó, T., & Miklósi, Á. (2008). Dogs can discriminate barks from different situations. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 114, 159–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miklósi, A. (2007). Dog: Behaviour, evolution and cognition. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, D. S., Ramos, D., Estelles, M. G., & Hargrave, G. (2006). A triple blind placebo-controlled investigation into the assessment of the effect of Dog Appeasing Pheromone (DAP) on anxiety related behaviour of problem dogs in the veterinary clinic. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 98, 114–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pal, S. K. (2003). Urine marking by free-ranging dogs (Canis familiaris) in relation to sex, season, place and posture. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 80, 45–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quaranta, A., Siniscalchi, M., & Vallortigara, G. (2007). Asymmetric tail-wagging responses by dogs to different emotive stimuli. Current Biology, 17, R199–R201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rooney, N. J. (2016). Welfare concerns about pedigree dog breeding – Almost 10 years of progress? In 22nd FECAVA Eurocongress (pp. 86–90). Vienna: FECAVA, 22–25 June 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonet, P., Versteeg, D., & Storie, D. (2005). Dog laughter: Recorded play back reduces stress related aggression in shelter dogs. In N. Clum, S. Silver, & P. Thomas (Eds.), Proceedings of the seventh international conference on environmental enrichment (pp. 170–176). New York: Wildlife Conservation Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stafford, K. (2006). The welfare of dogs. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, A. M., Reby, D., & McComb, K. (2010). Size communication in domestic dog, Canis familiaris, growls. Animal Behaviour, 79, 205–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Udell, M. A. R., Lord, K., Feuerbacher, E. N., & Wynne, C. D. L. (2014). Dog’s-eye view of canine cognition. In A. Horowitz (Ed.), Domestic dog cognition and behavior (pp. 221–240). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Yeon, S. C. (2007). The vocal communication of canines. Journal of Veterinary Behavior, 2, 141–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, S., & McCowan, B. (2004). Barking in domestic dog: Context specificity and individual identification. Animal Behaviour, 68, 343–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Irena Petak .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Petak, I. (2019). Canine Communication. In: Vonk, J., Shackelford, T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Animal Cognition and Behavior. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47829-6_1695-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47829-6_1695-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47829-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47829-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics