Encyclopedia of Animal Cognition and Behavior

Living Edition
| Editors: Jennifer Vonk, Todd Shackelford

Alloparental Care

  • S. SteadEmail author
  • S. Mucha
  • I. Bădescu
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47829-6_1400-1

Synonyms

Definition

“Alloparental care” is care that is directed by an individual (an alloparent) toward dependent young that are not their offspring (Wilson 1975). The act of providing alloparental care is referred to as “alloparenting.”

Types of Alloparental Care

Alloparental care has been reported widely across the animal kingdom, specifically in birds (Koenig and Dickinson 2004), fishes (Wisenden 1999), invertebrates (Wilson 1971), and mammals (Solomon and French 1997). Animals employ a variety of strategies to produce and rear their young, which influences the ways that alloparents can contribute care. Most birds, fishes, and invertebrates lay eggs, while all mammals (aside from monotremes) give birth to live young. In most mammals, milk is the sole medium of nutrient intake for young during the first stage of life. In other taxa, young immediately feed on similar materials to mature individuals, either with the...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Brouwer, L., Richardson, D. S., & Komdeur, J. (2012). Helpers at the nest improve late-life offspring performance: Evidence from a long-term study and a cross-foster experiment. PLoS, 7, e33167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Clutton-Brock, T. H. (2002). Breeding together: Kin selection and mutualism in cooperative vertebrates. Science, 296, 69–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Clutton-Brock, T. H., Gaynor, D., Kansky, R., MacColl, A. D. C., McIlrath, G., Chadwick, P., Brotherton, P. N. M., O’Riain, J. M., Manser, M., & Skinner, J. D. (1998). Costs of cooperative behaviour in suricates (Suricata suricatta). Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 265, 185–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clutton-Brock, T. H., Russell, A. F., Sharpe, L. L., Young, A. J., Balmforth, Z., & McIlrath, G. M. (2002). Evolution and development of sex differences in cooperative behaviour in meerkats. Science, 297, 253–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cockburn, A. (1998). Evolution of helping behaviour in cooperatively breeding birds. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 29, 141–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dixit, T., English, S., & Lukas, D. (2017). The relationship between egg size and helper number in cooperative breeders: A meta-analysis across species. PeerJ, 5, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fedigan, L. M. (1982). Kinship: The ties that bind. In L. M. Fedigan (Ed.), Primate paradigms: Sex roles and social bonds (pp. 121–133). Montreal: Eden Press.Google Scholar
  8. Gaston, A. J. (1978). Evolution of group territorial behavior and cooperative breeding. The American Naturalist, 112, 1091–1100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hamilton, W. D. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7, 1–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hatchwell, B. J. (1999). Investment strategies of breeders in avian cooperative breeding systems. The American Naturalist, 154, 205–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hawkes, K., & Coxworth, J. E. (2013). Grandmothers and the evolution of human longevity: A review of findings and future directions. Evolutionary Anthropology, 22, 294–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Heinsohn, R. G., & Legge, S. (1999). The cost of helping. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 14, 53–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hodge, S. J., Bell, M. B. V., Mwanguhya, F., Kyabulima, S., Waldick, R. C., & Russell, A. F. (2009). Maternal weight, offspring competitive ability, and the evolution of communal breeding. Behavioral Ecology, 20, 729–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Koenig, W. D., & Dickinson, J. L. (2004). Ecology and evolution of cooperative breeding in birds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kokko, H., Johnstone, R. A., & Clutton-Brock, T. H. (2001). The evolution of cooperative breeding through group augmentation. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 268, 187–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lindström, J. (1999). Early development and fitness in birds and mammals. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 14, 343–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. MacLeod, K. J., & Lukas, D. (2014). Revisiting non-offspring nursing: Allonursing evolves when the costs are low. Biology Letters, 10, 20140378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Maestripieri, D. (1994). Social structure, infant handling and mothering styles in group living Old World monkeys. International Journal of Primatology, 15, 531–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mitani, J. C., & Watts, D. (1997). The evolution of non-maternal caretaking among anthropoid primates: Do helpers help? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 40, 213–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Russell, A. F., Young, A., Spong, G., Jordan, N., & Clutton-Brock, T. (2007). Helpers increase the reproductive potential of offspring in cooperative meerkats. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 274, 513–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Russell, A. F., Langmore, N. E., Gardner, J. L., & Kilner, R. M. (2008). Maternal investment tactics in superb fairy-wrens. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 275, 29–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Santema, P., & Clutton-Brock. (2012). Dominant female meerkats do not use aggression to elevate work rates of helpers in response to increased brood demand. Animal Behaviour, 83, 827–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Selander, R. K. (1964). Speciation in wrens of the genus Campylorhynchus. University of California Publications in Zoology, 74, 198–209.Google Scholar
  24. Solomon, N. G., & French, J. A. (1997). Cooperative breeding in mammals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Tanaka, H., Kohda, M., & Frommen, J. (2018). Helpers increase the reproductive success of breeders in the cooperatively breeding cichlid Neolamprologus obscurus. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 72, 152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wilson, E. O. (1971). The insect societies. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Wilson, E. O. (1975). Sociobiology: The new synthesis. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Wisenden, B. D. (1999). Alloparental care in fishes. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 9, 45–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Zahavi, A. (1995). Altruism as a handicap: The limitations of kin selection and reciprocity. Journal of Avian Biology, 26, 1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Zöttl, M., Vullioud, P., Mendonca, R., Tico, M. T., Gaynor, D., Mitchell, A., & Clutton-Brock, T. (2016). Differences in cooperative behaviour among Damaraland mole rats are consequences of an age-related polyethism. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113, 10382–10387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Crown 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Department of BiologyHumboldt-UniversitätBerlinGermany
  3. 3.Departement d’AnthropologieUniversité de MontréalMontréalCanada

Section editors and affiliations

  • Peggy Mason
    • 1
  • Yuri Sugano
    • 2
  1. 1.University of ChicagoChicagoUSA
  2. 2.NeurobiologyUniversity of ChicagoChicagoUSA