Encyclopedia of Animal Cognition and Behavior

Living Edition
| Editors: Jennifer Vonk, Todd Shackelford

Biological Preparedness

  • Aimee S. Dunlap
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47829-6_1301-1

Definition

Biological preparedness is a broad explanation for why some associations are learned more easily than others, invoking the evolutionary history of the animal.

Introduction

Animals appear to learn about some stimuli in the world better than others, and a number of studies have shown that some sets of stimuli seem to be more easily associated than others. Some explanations exist for why this might occur, including ideas of belongingness and preparedness. Biological preparedness was first introduced as a term by Martin Seligman in his seminal paper “On the generality of the laws of learning” (Seligman 1970). As with any trait, learning and behavior in any species are the result of evolutionary processes. Broadly speaking, learning enables an animal to use past experience to inform future behavior. Learning allows an individual to better track a changing environment, and this plasticity forms the foundation of flexible behavior. While the neurological mechanisms underlying...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Alatalo, R. V., & Mappes, J. (1996). Tracking the evolution of warning signals. Nature, 382, 708–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bolles, R. C. (1970). Species-specific defense reactions and avoidance learning. Psychological Review, 77, 32–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cook, M., & Mineka, S. (1990). Selective associations in the observational conditioning of fear in rhesus monkeys. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 16(4), 372–389.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Damianopoulos, E. N. (1989). Biological constraints revisited: A critique. Animal Learning & Behavior, 17(2), 234–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dobrzecka, C., Szwejkowska, G., & Konorski, J. (1966). Qualitative versus directional cues in two forms of differentiation. Science, 153, 87–89.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Domjan, M., Cusato, B., & Krause, M. (2004). Learning with arbitrary versus ecological conditioned stimuli: Evidence from sexual conditioning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11(2), 232–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dunlap, A. S., & Stephens, D. W. (2009). Components of change in the evolution of learning and unlearned preference. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 276, 3201–3208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dunlap, A. S., & Stephens, D. W. (2014). Experimental evolution of prepared learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA, 111(32), 11750–11755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dunlap, A. S., McLinn, C. M., MacCormick, H., Scott, M., & Kerr, B. (2009). Why some memories do not last a lifetime: Optimal long-term recall in changing environments. Behavioral Ecology, 20(1096–1105), 1096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ferrari, M. C. O., Vrtelova, J., Brown, G. E., & Chivers, D. P. (2012). Understanding the role of uncertainty on learning and retention of predator information. Animal Cognition, 15, 807–813.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Garcia, J., & Koelling, R. A. (1966). Relation of a cue to consequence in avoidance learning. Psychonomic Science, 4, 123–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Knudsen, E. I. (2007). Fundamental components of attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 30, 57–78.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Kraemer, P. J., & Golding, J. M. (1997). Adaptive forgetting in animals. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4(4), 480–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Krause, M. A. (2015). Evolutionary perspectives on learning: Conceptual and methodological issues in the study of adaptive specializations. Animal Cognition, 18(4), 807–820.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Linwick, D., Patterson, J., & Overmier, J. B. (1981). On inferring selective associations: Methodological issues. Animal Learning & Behavior, 9, 508–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Logue, A. W. (1979). Taste aversion and the generality of the laws of learning. Psychological Bulletin, 86(2), 276–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. LoLordo, V. M. (1979). Selective associations. In A. Dickinson & R. A. Boakes (Eds.), Mechanisms of learning and motivation: a memorial volume to Jerzy Konorski (pp. 367–398). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc..Google Scholar
  18. Ohman, A., & Mineka, S. (2001). Fears, phobias, and preparedness: Toward an evolved module of fear and fear learning. Psychological Review, 108(3), 483–522.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Prudic, K. L., Skemp, A. K., & Papaj, D. R. (2007). Aposematic coloration, luminance contrast, and the benefits of conspicuousness. Behavioral Ecology, 18(1), 41–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Roper, T. J., & Redstone, S. (1987). Conspicuousness of distasteful prey affects the strength and durability of one-trial avoidance learning. Animal Behaviour, 35, 739–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rozin, P., & Kalat, J. W. (1971). Specific hungers and poison avoidance as adaptive specializations of learning. Psychological Review, 78, 459–486.Google Scholar
  22. Ryan, M. J., & Cummings, M. E. (2013). Perceptual biases and mate choice. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics, 44, 437–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Seligman, M. E. P. (1970). On the generality of the laws of learning. Psychological Review, 77(5), 406–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Seligman, M. E. P. (1971). Phobias and preparedness. Behavior Therapy, 2(3), 307–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sherry, D. F., & Schacter, D. L. (1987). The evolution of multiple memory systems. Psychological Review, 94, 439–454.Google Scholar
  26. Shettleworth, S. J. (1972). Constraints on learning. In D. S. Lehrman et al. (Eds.), Advances in the Study of Behavior, 4, 1–68. Academic Press.Google Scholar
  27. Shettleworth, S. J. (1990). Spatial memory in food-storing birds. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 329, 14–151.Google Scholar
  28. Shettleworth, S. J. (1994). Biological approaches to learning. In N. J. Mackintosh (Ed.), Animal Learning and Cognition (pp. 185–219). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  29. Skelhorn, J., & Rowe, C. (2010). Birds learn to use distastefulness as a signal of toxicity. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 277, 1729–1734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Skelhorn, J., Halpin, C. G., & Rowe, C. (2016). Learning about aposematic prey. Behavioral Ecology, 27(4), 955–964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Snell-Rood, E. C., & Steck, M. (2015). Experience drives the development of movement-cognition correlations in a butterfly. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 3, 63–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Stephens, D. W. (1991). Change, regularity, and value in the evolution of animal learning. Behavioral Ecology, 2, 77–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stevens, M. (2013). Sensory ecology, behaviour, & evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. ten Cate, C., & Rowe, C. (2007). Biases in signal evolution: Learning makes a difference. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 22, 380–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Thorndike, E. L. (1911). Animal intelligence: experimental studies. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Thorndike, E. L. (1932). The fundamentals of learning. New York: Teachers College Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of Missouri – Saint LouisSaint LouisUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Oskar Pineno
    • 1
  1. 1.Hofstra UniversityLong IslandUSA