Adhesives with Nanoparticles

Living reference work entry
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

The increased commercial availability and the reduced prices of nanoparticles are leading to their incorporation in polymers and structural adhesives. This chapter outlines the principal types of nanoparticles, and the methods that may be used to disperse the particles in a polymer matrix. It discusses how nanoparticles can alter the mechanical properties (e.g., stiffness), electrical properties (e.g., conductivity), functional properties (e.g., permeability, glass transition temperature), and fracture performance of thermoset polymers. The effect of nanoparticles on joint performance is also discussed.

Keywords

Adhesive Alignment Carbon nanofiber Carbon nanotube Dispersion Electrical properties Flammability Fracture Graphene Layered silicate Mechanical properties Modulus Nanoparticle Processing Safety Thermal stability Toughening mechanisms Toxicity 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Ahmed S, Jones FR (1990) A review of particulate reinforcement theories for polymer composites. J Mater Sci 25:4933Google Scholar
  2. Ajayan PM, Stephan O et al (1994) Aligned carbon nanotube arrays formed by cutting a polymer resin-nanotube composite. Science 265:1212Google Scholar
  3. Alexandre M, Dubois P (2000) Polymer-layered silicate nanocomposites: preparation, properties and uses of a new class of materials. Mater Sci Eng R 28:1Google Scholar
  4. Azimi HR, Pearson RA et al (1996a) Fatigue of hybrid epoxy composites: Epoxies containing rubber and hollow glass spheres. Polym Eng Sci 36:2352Google Scholar
  5. Azimi HR, Pearson RA et al (1996b) Fatigue of rubber-modified epoxies: effect of particle size and volume fraction. J Mater Sci 31:3777Google Scholar
  6. Baik Y, Lee S et al (2005) Unidirectional alignment of carbon nano-sized fiber using drawing process. J Mater Sci 40:6037Google Scholar
  7. Bechelany M, Brioude A et al (2007) Large-scale preparation of faceted Si 3N 4 nanorods from beta-SiC nanowires. Nanotechnology 18:335305Google Scholar
  8. Becker O, Simon GP (2006) Epoxy nanocomposites based on layered silicates and other nanostructured fillers. In: Mai YW, Yu ZZ (eds) Polymer nanocomposites. Woodhead, Cambridge, p 594Google Scholar
  9. Beyer G (2002) Carbon nanotubes as flame retardants for polymers. Fire Mater 26:291Google Scholar
  10. Blackman BRK, Kinloch AJ et al (2007) The fracture and fatigue behaviour of nano-modified epoxy polymers. J Mater Sci 42:7049Google Scholar
  11. Brnardic I, Macan J et al (2008) Thermal degradation kinetics of epoxy/organically modified montmorillonite nanocomposites. J Appl Polym Sci 107:1932Google Scholar
  12. Brooker RD, Blackman BRK et al (2008) Nano-reinforcement of epoxy/thermoplastic blends. In: 31st annual meeting of the adhesion society, Austin, USA, Adhesion Society, Blacksburg, USAGoogle Scholar
  13. Brooker RD, Kinloch AJ et al (2010) The morphology and fracture properties of thermoplastic-toughened epoxy polymers. J Adhes 86:726Google Scholar
  14. Brown DM, Kinloch IA et al (2007) An in vitro study of the potential of carbon nanotubes and nanofibres to induce inflammatory mediators and frustrated phagocytosis. Carbon 45:1743Google Scholar
  15. Bugnicourt E, Galy J et al (2007) Effect of sub-micron silica fillers on the mechanical performances of epoxy-based composites. Polymer 48:1596Google Scholar
  16. Cao Y, Irwin PC et al (2004) The future of nanodielectrics in the electrical power industry. IEEE Trans Dielectric Electrical Insul 11:797Google Scholar
  17. Chakrabarti S, Nagasaka T et al (2006) Growth of super long aligned brush-like carbon nanotubes. Jpn J Appl Phys Expr Lett 45:L720Google Scholar
  18. Chandradass J, Bae D-S (2008) Preparation and properties of barium titanate nanopowder/epoxy composites. Mater Manuf Process 23:116Google Scholar
  19. CheapTubes (2009.) http://www.cheaptubes.com. Retrieved 4 Nov 2009
  20. Chen C, Curliss D (2001) Resin matrix composites: organoclay-aerospace epoxy nanocomposites, Part II. SAMPE J 37:11Google Scholar
  21. Chen TK, Jan YH (1992) Fracture mechanism of toughened epoxy-resin with bimodal rubber-particle size distribution. J Mater Sci 27:111Google Scholar
  22. Chen XQ, Saito T et al (2001) Aligning single-wall carbon nanotubes with an alternating-current electric field. Appl Phys Lett 78:3714Google Scholar
  23. Demczyk BG, Wang YM et al (2002) Direct mechanical measurement of the tensile strength and elastic modulus of multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Mater Sci Eng A 334:173Google Scholar
  24. Dodiuk H, Belinski I et al (2006) Polyurethane adhesives containing functionalized nanoclays. J Adhes Sci Technol 20:1345Google Scholar
  25. Dompas D, Groeninckx G (1994) Toughening behavior of rubber-modified thermoplastic polymers involving very small rubber particles. 1. A criterion for internal rubber cavitation. Polymer 35:4743Google Scholar
  26. Feynman RP (1959) .There’s plenty of room at the bottom – an invitation to enter a new field of physics http://www.;zyvex.com/nanotech/feynman.html. Accessed 9 Apr 2008
  27. Fiedler B, Gojny FH et al (2006) Fundamental aspects of nano-reinforced composites. Compos Sci Technol 66:3115Google Scholar
  28. Gilbert EN, Hayes BS et al (2003) Nano-alumina modified epoxy based film adhesives. Polym Eng Sci 43:1096Google Scholar
  29. Gilman JW (1999) Flammability and thermal stability studies of polymer layered-silicate (clay) nanocomposites. Appl Clay Sci 15:31Google Scholar
  30. Gilman JW, Harris RH et al (1999b) Cyanate ester clay nanocomposites: synthesis and flammability studies. In: Evolving and revolutionary technologies for the new millennium 44th international SAMPE symposium/exhibition, Long beach, CA, USA, Society for the Advancement of Material and Process Engineering (SAMPE)Google Scholar
  31. Gilman JW, Kashiwagi T et al (1999a) Flammability studies of polymer layered silicate nanocomposites: polyolefin, epoxy and vinyl ester resins. In: Ak-Malaika S, Golovoy A et al (eds) Chemistry and technology of polymer additives. Blackwell Science, Malden, p 249Google Scholar
  32. Gilman JW, Harris RH et al (2000b) Phenolic cyanate ester nanocomposites: effect of ammonium ion structure on flammability and nano-dispersion. In: Spring meeting, division of polymeric materials: science and engineering, American Chemical Society, San Francisco, USA, American Chemical SocietyGoogle Scholar
  33. Gilman JW, Jackson CL et al (2000a) Flammability properties of polymer-layered-silicate nanocomposites. polypropylene and polystyrene. Nanocomposites Chem Mater 12:1866Google Scholar
  34. Gintert MJ, Jana SC et al (2007) A novel strategy for nanoclay exfoliation in thermoset polyimide nanocomposite systems. Polymer 48:4166Google Scholar
  35. Gojny FH, Nastalczyk J et al (2003) Surface modified multi-walled carbon nanotubes in CNT/epoxy-composites. Chem Phys Lett 370:820Google Scholar
  36. Gojny FH, Wichmann MHG et al (2004) Carbon nanotube-reinforced epoxy-composites: enhanced stiffness and fracture toughness at low nanotube content. Compos Sci Technol 64:2363Google Scholar
  37. Gojny FH, Wichmann MHG et al (2006) Evaluation and identification of electrical and thermal conduction mechanisms in carbon nanotube/epoxy composites. Polymer 47:2036Google Scholar
  38. Gordon JE (1978) The new science of strong materials or why you don’t fall through the floor. Penguin, HarmondsworthGoogle Scholar
  39. Green K, Dean D et al (2006) Aligned carbon nanofiber/epoxy nanocomposites. Polym Mater Sci Eng 94:53Google Scholar
  40. Gusev AA, Lusti HR (2001) Rational design of nanocomposites for barrier applications. Adv Mater 13:1641Google Scholar
  41. Hackman I, Hollaway L (2006) Epoxy-layered silicate nanocomposites in civil engineering. Composites Pt A 37:1161Google Scholar
  42. Harper T (2003) What is nanotechnology? Nanotechnology 14:U5Google Scholar
  43. Harris PJF (1999) Carbon nanotubes and related structures: new materials for the twenty-first century. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  44. Harris PJF (2009) Carbon nanotube science: synthesis, properties and applications. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  45. Hay J, Shaw S (2001) Into the Labyrinth. Chem Br 2001:34Google Scholar
  46. Hsiao K-T, Alms J et al (2003) Use of epoxy/multiwalled carbon nanotubes as adhesives to join graphite fibre reinforced polymer composites. Nanotechnology 14:791Google Scholar
  47. Hsieh TH, Kinloch AJ et al (2010) The toughness of epoxy polymers and fibre composites modified with rubber microparticles and silica nanoparticles. J Mater Sci 45:1193Google Scholar
  48. ICBA (2008) .International Carbon Black Association, http://www.carbon-black.;org. Retrieved 9 Apr 2008
  49. Iijima S (1991) Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon. Nature 354:56Google Scholar
  50. Iijima S, Ichihashi T (1993) Single-shell carbon nanotubes of 1-nm diameter. Nature 363:603Google Scholar
  51. Imai T, Sawa F et al (2006) Effects of nano- and micro-filler mixture on electrical insulation properties of epoxy based composites. IEEE Trans Dielectric Electrical Insul 13:319Google Scholar
  52. Johnsen BB, Kinloch AJ et al (2007) Toughening mechanisms of nanoparticle-modified epoxy polymers. Polymer 48:530Google Scholar
  53. Kaneka (2008.) http://www.kaneka.com. Retrieved 9 Apr 2008
  54. Karger-Kocsis J, Friedrich K (1992) Fatigue crack-propagation and related failure in modified, anhydride-cured epoxy-resins. Colloid Polym Sci 270:549Google Scholar
  55. Karger-Kocsis J, Gryshchuk O et al (2003) Interpenetrating vinylester/epoxy resins modified with organophilic layered silicates. Compos Sci Technol 63:2045Google Scholar
  56. Kathi J, Rhee K (2008) Surface modification of multi-walled carbon nanotubes using 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane. J Mater Sci 43:33Google Scholar
  57. Kawaguchi T, Pearson RA (2003) The effect of particle-matrix adhesion on the mechanical behavior of glass filled epoxies. Part 2. A study on fracture toughness. Polymer 44:4239Google Scholar
  58. Kinloch AJ, Lee JH et al (2003) Toughening structural adhesives via nano- and micro-phase inclusions. J Adhes 79:867Google Scholar
  59. Kinloch AJ, Maxwell DL et al (1985) The fracture of hybrid-particulate composites. J Mater Sci 20:4169Google Scholar
  60. Kinloch AJ, Mohammed RD et al (2005) The effect of silica nano particles and rubber particles on the toughness of multiphase thermosetting epoxy polymers. J Mater Sci 40:5083Google Scholar
  61. Kinloch AJ, Taylor AC (2002) The toughening of cyanate-ester polymers. Part I: physical modification using particles, fibres and woven-mats. J Mater Sci 37:433Google Scholar
  62. Kinloch AJ, Taylor AC (2003) Mechanical and fracture properties of epoxy/inorganic micro- and nano-composites. J Mater Sci Lett 22:1439Google Scholar
  63. Kinloch AJ, Taylor AC (2006) The mechanical properties and fracture behaviour of epoxy-inorganic micro- and nano-composites. J Mater Sci 41:3271Google Scholar
  64. Kody RS, Lesser AJ (1999) Yield behavior and energy absorbing characteristics of rubber-modified epoxies subjected to biaxial stress states. Polym Compos 20:250Google Scholar
  65. Koerner H, Hampton E et al (2005) Generating triaxial reinforced epoxy/montmorillonite nanocomposites with uniaxial magnetic fields. Chem Mater 17:1990Google Scholar
  66. Kornmann X (1999) Synthesis and characterisation of thermoset-clay nanocomoposites. Licentiate thesis, materials and manufacturing engineering department, University of Lulea, Lulea, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  67. Lam C-W, James JT et al (2004) Pulmonary toxicity of single-wall carbon nanotubes in mice 7 and 90 days after intratracheal instillation. Toxicol Sci 77:126Google Scholar
  68. Lam C-K, Lau K-T et al (2005) Effect of ultrasound sonication in nanoclay clusters of nanoclay/epoxy composites. Mater Lett 59:1369Google Scholar
  69. Lau K-T, Gu C et al (2004) Stretching process of single- and multi-walled carbon nanotubes for nanocomposite applications. Carbon 42:426Google Scholar
  70. Lazzeri A, Bucknall CB (1993) Dilatational bands in rubber-toughened polymers. J Mater Sci 28:6799Google Scholar
  71. Liang G, Hu X (2004) Preparation and performance of aluminum borate whisker-reinforced epoxy composites. I. Effect of whiskers on processing, reactivity, and mechanical properties. J Appl Polym Sci 92:1950–1954Google Scholar
  72. Liang YL, Pearson RA (2009) Toughening mechanisms in epoxy-silica nanocomposites (ESNs). Polymer 50:4895Google Scholar
  73. Liu WP, Hoa SV et al (2004) Morphology and performance of epoxy nanocomposites modified with organoclay and rubber. Polym Eng Sci 44:1178Google Scholar
  74. Lu KL, Lago RM et al (1996) Mechanical damage of carbon nanotubes by ultrasound. Carbon 34:814Google Scholar
  75. Martin CA, Sandler JKW et al (2005) Electric field-induced aligned multi-wall carbon nanotube networks in epoxy composites. Polymer 46:877Google Scholar
  76. Messersmith PB, Giannelis EP (1994) Synthesis and characterisation of layered silicate-epoxy nanocomposites. Chem Mater 6:1719Google Scholar
  77. Mohammed RD (2007) Material properties and fracture mechanisms of epoxy nano-composites. PhD thesis, mechanical engineering. Imperial college of science, technology and medicine, LondonGoogle Scholar
  78. Moloney AC, Kausch HH et al (1983) The fracture of particulate-filled epoxide resins. J Mater Sci 19:1125Google Scholar
  79. Montanari GC, Ciani F et al (2005) Electric strength, space charge and surface discharge characterization of nanostructured epoxy-silicate insulating materials. In: 2005 International symposium on electrical insulating materials, vols 1–3, Tokyo, Institute of Electrical Engineers, JapanGoogle Scholar
  80. Morisada Y, Miyamoto Y et al (2007) Mechanical properties of SiC composites incorporating SiC-coated multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Int J Refract Met Hard Mater 25:322Google Scholar
  81. Naganuma T, Kagawa Y (2002) Effect of particle size on the optically transparent nano meter-order glass particle-dispersed epoxy matrix composites. Compos Sci Technol 62:1187Google Scholar
  82. Nanoresins (2008.) http://www.nanoresins.com. Retrieved 9 Apr 2008
  83. Oba T (1999) The fatigue behaviour of toughened epoxy polymers. PhD thesis, mechanical engineering. Imperial college of science, technology and medicine, LondonGoogle Scholar
  84. Patel S, Bandyopadhyay A et al (2006) Synthesis and properties of nanocomposite adhesives. J Adhes Sci Technol 20:371Google Scholar
  85. Pearson RA, Yee AF (1991) Influence of particle-size and particle-size distribution on toughening mechanisms in rubber-modified epoxies. J Mater Sci 26:3828Google Scholar
  86. Puglia D, Valentini L et al (2003) Analysis of the cure reaction of carbon nanotubes/epoxy resin composites through thermal analysis and Raman spectroscopy. J Appl Polym Sci 88:452Google Scholar
  87. Radford T (2003) Brave new world or miniature menace? Why Charles fears grey goo nightmare. The Guardian, London, Issued 29 April 2003Google Scholar
  88. Ragosta G, Abbate M et al (2005) Epoxy-silica particulate nanocomposites: chemical interactions, reinforcement and fracture toughness. Polymer 46:10506Google Scholar
  89. Rosso P, Ye L et al (2006) A toughened epoxy resin by silica nanoparticle reinforcement. J Appl Polym Sci 100:1849Google Scholar
  90. Rothon RN, Hancock M (1995) General principles guiding selection and use of particulate materials. In: Rothon RN (ed) Particulate-filled polymer composites. Longman Scientific and Technical, Harlow, p 1Google Scholar
  91. Saito R, Dresselhaus G et al (1998) Physical properties of carbon nanotubes. Imperial College, LondonGoogle Scholar
  92. Salinas-Ruiz MDM (2009) Development of a rubber toughened epoxy adhesive loaded with carbon nanotubes, for aluminium – polymer bonds. PhD thesis, School of applied science, Cranfield UniversityGoogle Scholar
  93. Sandler J, Shaffer MSP et al (1999) Development of a dispersion process for carbon nanotubes in an epoxy matrix and the resulting electrical properties. Polymer 40:5967Google Scholar
  94. Sandler JKW, Kirk JE et al (2003) Ultra-low electrical percolation threshold in carbon-nanotube-epoxy composites. Polymer 44:5893Google Scholar
  95. Sautereau H, Maazouz A et al (1995) Fatigue behavior of glass bead filled epoxy. J Mater Sci 30:1715Google Scholar
  96. Schadler LS (2003) Polymer-based and polymer-filled nanocomposites. In: Ajayan PM, Schadler LS et al (eds) Nanocomposite science and technology. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, p 380Google Scholar
  97. Schmid CF, Klingenberg DJ (2000) Mechanical flocculation in flowing fiber suspensions. Phys Rev Lett 84:290Google Scholar
  98. Shaffer MSP, Kinloch IA (2004) Prospects for nanotube and nanofibre composites. Compos Sci Technol 64:2281Google Scholar
  99. Shaffer MSP, Sandler JKW (2006) Carbon nanotube/nanofibre polymer composites. In: Advani SG (ed) Processing and properties of nanocomposites. World Scientific, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  100. Sheng N, Boyce MC et al (2004) Multiscale micromechanical modeling of polymer/clay nanocomposites and the effective clay particle. Polymer 45:487Google Scholar
  101. Sigma Aldrich (2008.) http://www.sigmaaldrich.com Retrieved 9 Apr 2008
  102. Sohn Lee J (2009) The fatigue behaviour of nano-modified epoxy adhesives. PhD thesis, Department of mechanical engineering, Imperial college London, LondonGoogle Scholar
  103. Sorrentino A, Gorrasi G et al (2006) Barrier properties of polymer/clay nanocomposites. In: Mai YW, Yu ZZ (eds) Polymer nanocomposites. Woodhead, Cambridge, p 594Google Scholar
  104. Sprenger S, Eger C et al (2003) Nanoadhesives: toughness and high strength. Adhaesion, Kleben and Dichten 2003:24Google Scholar
  105. Sprenger S, Eger C et al (2004). Nano-modified ambient temperature curing epoxy adhesives. Adhaesion, Kleben and Dichten 2004:1Google Scholar
  106. Tang Y, Liang G et al (2007) Performance of aluminum borate whisker reinforced cyanate ester resin. J Appl Polym Sci 106:4131Google Scholar
  107. Tarrant AE (2004) Thermoset-acrylic/layered-silicate nanocomposites: synthesis and structure-property relationships. Imperial College London Thesis, LondonGoogle Scholar
  108. Tjong SC (2006) Structural and mechanical properties of polymer nanocomposites. Mater Sci Eng R 53:73Google Scholar
  109. Triantafyllidis KS, LeBaron PC et al (2006) Epoxy-clay fabric film composites with unprecedented oxygen-barrier properties. Chem Mater 18:4393Google Scholar
  110. Vanorio T, Prasad M et al (2003) Elastic properties of dry clay mineral aggregates, suspensions and sandstones. Geophys J Int 155:319Google Scholar
  111. Wang ZL (ed) (2001) Characterization of nanophase materials. Wiley-VCH, WeinheimGoogle Scholar
  112. Wang Z, Massam J et al (2000) Epoxy-clay nanocomposites. In: Pinnavaia TJ, Beall GW (eds) Polymer-clay nanocomposites. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  113. Warheit DB, Laurence BR et al (2004) Comparative pulmonary toxicity assessment of single-wall carbon nanotubes in rats. Toxicol Sci 77:117Google Scholar
  114. Wetzel B, Rosso P et al (2006) Epoxy nanocomposites – fracture and toughening mechanisms. Eng Fract Mech 73:2375Google Scholar
  115. Xie X-L, Mai Y-W et al (2005) Dispersion and alignment of carbon nanotubes in polymer matrix: A review. Mater Sci Eng R 49:89Google Scholar
  116. Yasmin A, Daniel IM (2004) Mechanical and thermal properties of graphite platelet/epoxy composites. Polymer 45:8211Google Scholar
  117. Yasmin A, Abot JL et al (2003) Processing of clay/epoxy nanocomposites by shear mixing. Scr Mater 49:81Google Scholar
  118. Yasmin A, Luo JJ et al (2006a) Mechanical and thermal behavior of clay/epoxy nanocomposites. Compos Sci Technol 66:2415Google Scholar
  119. Yasmin A, Luo JJ et al (2006b) Processing of expanded graphite reinforced polymer nanocomposites. Compos Sci Technol 66:1182Google Scholar
  120. Yin M, Koutsky JA et al (1993) Characterization of carbon microfibers as reinforcement for epoxy resins. Chem Mater 5:1024Google Scholar
  121. Zeng MF, Sun XD et al (2007) Effects of SiO2 nanoparticles on the performance of carboxyl-randomized liquid butadiene-acrylonitrile rubber modified epoxy nanocomposites. J Appl Polym Sci 106:1347Google Scholar
  122. Zhang H, Zhang Z et al (2006) Property improvements of in situ epoxy nanocomposites with reduced interparticle distance at high nanosilica content. Acta Mater 54:1833Google Scholar
  123. Zhang W, Picu RC et al (2007) Suppression of fatigue crack growth in carbon nanotube composites. Appl Phys Lett 91:193109Google Scholar
  124. Zhou Y, Pervin F et al (2007) Effect vapor grown carbon nanofiber on thermal and mechanical properties of epoxy. J Mater Sci 42:7544Google Scholar
  125. Zhu YQ, Kroto HW et al (2002) A systematic study of ceramic nanostructures generated by arc discharge. Chem Phys Lett 365:457Google Scholar
  126. Zunjarrao S, Sriraman R et al (2006) Effect of processing parameters and clay volume fraction on the mechanical properties of epoxy-clay nanocomposites. J Mater Sci 41:2219Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringImperial College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations