In Vitro Delayed-Type Sensitivity Testing
Although patch testing is regarded to be the most standardized and reliable method for diagnosis of delayed-type hypersensitivity to contact allergens, its substitution by in vitro techniques would be advantageous for several reasons.
The lymphocyte transformation test (LTT) measures the allergen-specific proliferation or activation of T cells in vitro and has been explored as potential alternative for patch testing for decades. Beside numerous attempts to increase its sensitivity and specificity, the major drawback of a cell culture-based method is the poor solubility of many contact sensitizers and the need for chemical modification of prohaptens.
The LTT is used with regularity only for diagnosis of hypersensitivity to beryllium and adverse reactions to drugs. Its usefulness in occupational dermatology is limited and restricted to special situations as a supplement for patch testing with large panels of well-established sensitizers.
KeywordsPatch testing Lymphocyte transformation test Delayed-type hypersensitivity Beryllium Drug hypersensitivity In vitro testing MELISA Nickel Mercury T cells ELISpot Cytokines Cell proliferation Sensitivity Specificity
Lymphocyte transformation test
Peripheral blood mononuclear cells
- Bordignon V, Palamara F, Cordiali-Fei P, Vento A, Aiello A, Picardo M, Ensoli F, Cristaudo A (2008) Nickel, palladium and rhodium induced IFN-gamma and IL-10 production as assessed by in vitro ELISpot-analysis in contact dermatitis patients. BMC Immunol 9:19. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2172-9-19CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Bordignon V, Palamara F, Altomonte G, Sperduti I, Pietravalle M, Cavallotti C, Cordiali-Fei P, Fuggetta MP, Cristaudo A, Ensoli F (2015) A laboratory test based on determination of cytokine profiles: a promising assay to identify exposition to contact allergens and predict the clinical outcome in occupational allergic contact dermatitis. BMC Immunol 16:4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12865-015-0066-3CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Fireman E, Shai AB, Alcalay Y, Ophir N, Kivity S, Stejskal V (2016) Identification of metal sensitization in sarcoid-like metal-exposed patients by the MELISA® lymphocyte proliferation test – a pilot study. J Occup Med Toxicol 11:18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12995-016-0101-1CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Kneilling M, Caroli U, Grimmel C, Fischer J, Eichner M, Wieder T, Maier FC, Röcken M, Biedermann T (2010) Para-phenylenediamine-specific lymphocyte activation test: a sensitive in vitro assay to detect para-phenylenediamine sensitization in patients with severe allergic reactions. Exp Dermatol 19:435–441CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Valentine-Thon E, Müller K, Guzzi G, Kreisel S, Ohnsorge P, Sandkamp M (2006) LTT-MELISA is clinically relevant for detecting and monitoring metal sensitivity. Neuro Endocrinol Lett 27(Suppl 1):17–24Google Scholar