Advertisement

Contact Allergy to Phenol-Formaldehyde Resins

  • Erik Zimerson
  • Magnus Bruze
Living reference work entry

Abstract

The raw materials, phenols and aldehydes, are not important allergens in phenol-formaldehyde resins.

The strongest allergens are found among monomers and dimers with reactive hydroxymethyl groups, the hydroxymethyl phenols.

Resins produced with a deficit of formaldehyde (novolac resins) show low allergenicity because they contain very low concentrations of hydroxymethyl phenols. Addition of formaldehyde needs to be done before curing. Novolac resins should not be used for patch testing.

The concentrations of allergens usually drop significantly when the resins are cured (e.g., phenol-formaldehyde resin), while some resins more or less retain their levels of allergens regardless of treatment (e.g., p- tert-butylphenol-formaldehyde resin).

Phenol-formaldehyde resins made from different phenols and/or aldehydes will contain different allergens, and cross-reactions between different resins should not be expected.

Patch testing should be performed with the specific phenol-formaldehyde resin the patient is exposed to.

p-tert-Butylcatechol is a strong sensitizer used as a stabilizer in plastic monomers (e.g., styrene) and is also found in p-tert-butylphenol-formaldehyde resin. In case of a positive patch test reaction to p-tert-butylphenol-formaldehyde resin with no clinically relevant exposure to this resin, p-tert-butylcatechol should be patch tested and exposure to this substance investigated.

Keywords

Allergic contact dermatitis Bakelite Delayed hypersensitivity Novolac resin Resol resin Hydroxymethyl groups Sensitizing monomers and dimers 

References

  1. Aalto-Korte K, Suuronen K (2017) Screening allergic reactions to resol resin based on phenol and formaldehyde in a clinic of occupational dermatology. Contact Dermatitis 77:208–213.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.12792. Epub 2017 Apr 25. PubMed PMID: 28444762CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Agatha G, Schubert H (1979) Untersuchungen zur Allergen-Identifizierung bei der p-tertiären Butylphenol-Formaldehydharz-Allergie. Dermatol Monatschr 165:337–345Google Scholar
  3. Angelini E, Marinaro C, Carrozzo AM, Bianchi L, Delogu A, Gianello G, Nini G (1993) Allergic contact dermatitis of the lip margins from para-tertiary-butylphenol in a lip liner. Contact Dermatitis 28:146–148CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Arpa MG, Ortiz-Frutos FJ, Donoso CG, Pérez SP, Dies LI (2002) Active sensitization to para-tertiary-butylphenol-formaldehyde resin. Contact Dermatitis 47:124–125CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Avenel-Audran M, Goossens A, Zimerson E, Bruze M (2003) Contact dermatitis from electrocardiograph-monitoring electrodes: role of p- tert-butylphenol-formaldehyde resin. Contact Dermatitis 48:108–111CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bompart PV, Smagge G (1959) Quelques remarques d’ardre pratique á propos d’une application industrielle des résines formo-phénolique. Arch Mal Prof Méd Trav Sécuri Soc 20:64–67Google Scholar
  7. Bruze M (1985) Contact sensitizers in resins based on phenol and formaldehyde. Acta Dermato-Venereologica Suppl 119:1–83Google Scholar
  8. Bruze M (1986) Simultaneous reactions to phenol-formaldehyde resins colophony/hydroabietyl alcohol and balsam of Peru/perfume mixture. Contact Dermatitis 14:119–120CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bruze M (1988) Patch testing with a mixture of 2 phenol-formaldehyde resins. Contact Dermatitis 19:116–119CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Bruze M, Almgren G (1988) Occupational dermatoses in workers exposed to resins based on phenol and formaldehyde. Contact Dermatitis 19:272–277CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Bruze M, Zimerson E (1997) Cross-reaction patterns in patients with contact allergy to simple methylol phenols. Contact Dermatitis 37:82–86CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Bruze M, Zimerson E (2002) Contact allergy to o-cresol – a sensitizer in phenol-formaldehyde resin. Am J Contact Dermat 13:198–200CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Bruze M, Fregert S, Zimerson E (1985) Contact allergy to phenol-formaldehyde resins. Contact Dermatitis 12:81–86CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Bruze M, Persson L, Trulsson L, Zimerson E (1986) Demonstration of contact sensitizers in resins and products based on phenol and formaldehyde. Contact Dermatitis 14:146–154CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Calnan CD, Harman RRM (1959) Studies in contact dermatitis. X. Sensitivity to para-tertiary butylphenol. Trans St John’s Hosp Derm Soc 43:27–32Google Scholar
  16. Castelain PY, Pirious A, Raulot-Lapointe H, Rabaglia JL (1980) Sensitization to abieto-formo-phenolic resin in printing ink. Contact Dermatitis 6:145CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Cohen N, Modai D, Khahil A, Golik A (1989) Acute resin phenol-formaldehyde intoxication. A life threatening occupational hazard. Hum Toxicol 8:247–250CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Cronin E (1980) Contact dermatitis. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, pp 617–619Google Scholar
  19. Diepgen TL, Ofenloch RF, Bruze M, Bertuccio P, Cazzaniga S, Coenraads PJ, Elsner P, Goncalo M, Svensson Å, Naldi L (2016) Prevalence of contact allergy in the general population in different European regions. Br J Dermatol 174:319–329.  https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.14167. Epub 2015 Dec 26. PubMed PMID:26370659CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Downs AM, Sansome JE (1998) Palmoplantar dermatitis may be due to phenol-formaldehyde resin contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 39:147–148CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Engel HO, Calnan CD (1966) Resin dermatitis in a car factory. Br J Ind Med 23:62–66PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Estlander T, Kostiainen M, Jolanki R, Kanerva L (1998) Active sensitization and occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by para-tertiary-butylcatechol. Contact Dermatitis 38:96–100CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Fisher AA (1973) Contact dermatitis, 2nd edn. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, pp 16–18Google Scholar
  24. Foussereau MJ, Petitjean J, Barré JG (1968) Eczema aux bracelets-montres par allergie a des résines formol-p.t.butylphénol des colles pour cuir (résines du type c.k.r. 1634). Bull Soc Fr Dermatol Syphiligr 75:630–633PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Freeman S (1997) Shoe dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 36:247–251CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Fregert S (1980) Irritant dermatitis from phenol-formaldehyde resin powder. Contact Dermatitis 6:493CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Fregert S, Hjort N (1969) Results of standard patch tests with substances abandoned. Contact Dermatitis Newslett 5:85–86Google Scholar
  28. Fregert S, Tegner E (1972) Allergic contact dermatitis due to phenolic resin in ready products. Contact Dermatitis Newslett 12:328Google Scholar
  29. Gaul LE (1967) Absence of formaldehyde sensitivity in phenol formaldehyde dermatitis. J Invest Dermatol 48:485–486CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Gellin GA, Possick PA, Perone VB (1970) Depigmentation from 4-tertiary butyl catechol: an experimental study. J Invest Dermatol 55:190–197CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Hagdrup H, Egsgaard H, Carlsen L, Andersen KE (1994) Contact allergy to 2-hydroxy-5- tert-butyl benzylalcohol and 2,6-bis(hydroxymethyl)-4-tert-butylphenol, components of a phenolic resin used in marking pens. Contact Dermatitis 31:154–156CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Hamann CR, Zimerson E, Hamann D, Laugesen L, Carlsson B, Nathansen C, Hamann C, Bruze M (2012) Concentration variability of potent allergens of p-tert-butylphenol-formaldehyde resin (PTBP-FR) in patch test preparations and commercially available PTBP-FR. Br J Dermatol 166:761–770.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2011.10781.x. Epub 2012 Mar 12. PubMed PMID: 22182485CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Handley J, Todd D, Bingham A, Corbett R, Burrows D (1993) Allergic contact dermatitis from para-tertiary-butylphenol-formaldehyde resin (PTBP-F-R) in Northern Ireland. Contact Dermatitis 29:144–146CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Hayakawa R, Ogino Y, Suzuki M, Kaniwa M (1994) Allergic contact dermatitis from para-tertiary-butylphenol-formaldehyde resin (PTBP-F-R). Contact Dermatitis 30:187–188CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Hjort N, Fregert S (1967) Sensitivity to formaldehyde and formaldehyde resins. Contact Dermatitis Newslett 2:18–19Google Scholar
  36. Högberg M, Wahlberg JE (1980) Health screening for occupational dermatoses in house painters. Contact Dermatitis 6:100–106CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Holden CR, Gawcrodger DJ (2005) 10 years’ experience of patch testing with a shoe series in 230 patients: which allergens are important? Contact Dermatitis 53:37–39CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Isaksson M (2002) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from cured and used casting sand. Contact Dermatitis 46:239–240CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Isaksson M, Zimerson E, Bruze M (1999) Occupational dermatoses in composite production. J Occup Environ Med 41:261–266CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Isaksson M, Inerot A, Lidén C, Matura M, Stenberg B, Möller H, Bruze M (2011) Multicentre patch testing with a resol resin based on phenol and formaldehyde. Contact Dermatitis 65:34–37.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.2011.01921.x. Epub 2011 May 19. PubMed PMID: 21595700CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Isaksson M, Ale I, Andersen K, Diepgen T, Elsner P, Goossens A, Goh CL, Jerajani H, Maibach H, Matsunaga K, McFadden J, Nixon R, Sasseville D, Bruze M, International Contact Dermatitis Research Group (2015) Multicenter patch testing with a resol resin based on phenol and formaldehyde within the international contact dermatitis research group. Dermatitis 26:230–234.  https://doi.org/10.1097/DER.0000000000000137. PubMed PMID: 26367206CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Jeanty G, Massé J, Bercot P, Coq F (1984) Quantitative analysis of cigarette smoke condensate monophenols by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. Beiträge zur Tabakforschung Int 12:245–250Google Scholar
  43. Jordan WP, Bourlas M (1975) Contact dermatitis from typewriter correction paper. Cutis 15:594–595Google Scholar
  44. Kalimo K, Saarni H, Kytta J (1980) Immediate and delayed type reactions to formaldehyde resin in glass wool. Contact Dermatitis 6:496CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Kashani MN, Gorouhi F, Behnia F, Nazemi MJ, Dowlati Y, Firooz A (2005) Allergic contact dermatitis in Iran. Contact Dermatitis 52:154–158CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Lazarow A (2006) European standard series patch test results from a contact dermatitis clinic in Israel during the 7-year period from 1998–2004. Contact Dermatitis 55:73–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Macfarlane AW, Yu RC, King CM (1990) Contact sensitivity to para-tertiary-butylcatechol in an artificial limb. Contact Dermatitis 22:56–57CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Malten KE (1958) Occupational eczema due to para-tertiary butylphenol in a shoe adhesive. Dermatologica 117:103–109CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Malten KE (1987) Old and new, mainly occupational dermatological problems in the production and processing of plastics. In: Maibach HI (ed) Occupational and industrial dermatology. Year Book Medical, Chicago, pp 290–340Google Scholar
  50. Malten KE, Seutter E, Hara I et al (1971) Occupational vitiligo due to p- tert-butylphenol and homologues. Trans St Johns Hosp Dermatol Soc 57:115–134PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Malten KE, Rath R, Pastors PMH (1983) p- tert-butylphenol formaldehyde and other causes of shue dermatitis. Derm Beruf Umwelt 31:149–153PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Mancuso G, Reggiani M, Berdondini RM (1996) Occupational dermatitis in shoemakers. Contact Dermatitis 34:17–22CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Marques C, Goncalo M, Goncalo S (1994) Sensitivity to para-tertiary-butylphenol-formaldehyde resin in Portugal. Contact Dermatitis 30:300–301CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Matrolonardo M, Loconsole F, Conte A, Rantuccio F (1993) Allergic contact dermatitis due to para-tertiary-butylphenol-formaldehyde resin in a hearing aid. Contact Dermatitis 28:179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Mobacken H, Hersle K (1976) Allergic contact dermatitis caused by paratertiary butylphenol-formaldehyde resin in watch straps. Contact Dermatitis 2:59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Moran M, Martin-Pascual A (1978) Contact dermatitis to para-tertiary-butylphenol formaldehyde. Contact Dermatitis 4:372–373CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Owen CM, Beck MH (2001) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from phenol-formaldehyde resins. Contact Dermatitis 45:294–295CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Richardson ML (1993) The dictionary of substances and their effects. The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, pp 675–678Google Scholar
  59. Romaguera C, Grimalt F, Vilaplana J (1985) Paratertiary butylphenol formaldehyde resin in prosthesis. Contact Dermatitis 12:174PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Rycroft RJG, Wilkinson JD, Holmes R, Hay RJ (1980) Contact sensitization to p-tertiary-butylphenol (PTBP) resin in plastic nail adhesive. Clin Exp Dermatol 5:411–445Google Scholar
  61. Schubert H, Agatha G (1979) Zur Allergennatur der para- tert. Butylphenol-formaldhydharze Dermatosen 27:49–52Google Scholar
  62. Shono M, Ezoe K, Kaniwa M-A, Ikarashi Y, Kojima S, Nakamura A (1991) Allergic contact dermatitis from para-tertiary-butylphenol-formaldehyde resin (PTBP-FR) in athletic tape and leather adhesive. Contact Dermatitis 24:281–288CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Snell FD, Ettre LS (1973) Enzyclopedia of industrial chemical analysis, vol 17. Interscience, New York, pp 9–10Google Scholar
  64. Sonneck HJ (1964) Hautschäden durch Kunstharzäurekitte. Berufsdermatosen 12:42–48Google Scholar
  65. Stenberg B, Bruze M, Zimerson E (2015) Is p-tert-butylphenol-formaldehyde resin (PTBP-FR) in TRUE Test® (Mekos test) sensitizing the tested patients? Contact Dermatitis 73:350–357.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.12401. Epub 2015 Apr 23. PubMed PMID: 25903478CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Stevenson CJ (1981) Occupational vitiligo: clinical and epidemiological aspects. Br J Dermatol 105(suppl 21):51–56CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Tarvainen K (1995) Analysis of patients with allergic patch test reaction to a plastics and glue series. Contact Dermatitis 32:346–351CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Trattner A, Tarachi Y, David M (2003) Shoe contact dermatitis in Israel. Am J Contact Dermat 14:12–14PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. van der Willingen AH, Stolz E, van Joost T (1987) Sensitization to phenol formaldehyde in rubber glue. Contact Dermatitis 16:291–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Vincenzi C, Guerra L, Peluso AM, Zucchelli V (1992) Allergic contact dermatitis due to phenol-formaldehyde resin in a knee-guard. Contact Dermatitis 27:54CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Zimerson E, Bruze M (1998) Contact allergy to the monomers in p- tert-butylphenol formaldehyderesin in the guinea pig. Contact Dermatitis 39:222–226CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Zimerson E, Bruze M (1999) Demonstration of the contact sensitizer p- tert-butylcatechol in p- tert-butylphenol-formaldehyde resin. Am J Contact Dermat 10:2–6CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Zimerson E, Bruze M (2000a) Contact allergy to 5,5′-di- tert-butyl-2,2′-dihydroxy-(hydroxymethyl)-dibenzyl ethers, sensitizers, in p- tert-butylphenol-formaldehyde resin. Contact Dermatitis 43:20–26CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Zimerson E, Bruze M (2000b) Sensitizing capacity of 5,5′-di- tert-butyl-2,2′-dihydroxy-(hydroxymethyl)-dibenzyl ethers in the guinea pig. Contact Dermatitis 43:72–78CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Zimerson E, Bruze M (2002a) Sensitizing capacity of two monomeric aldehyde components in p- tert-butylphenol-formaldehyde resin. Acta Derm Venereol 82:418–422CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Zimerson E, Bruze M (2002b) Sensitizing capacity of some trimers in p- tert-butylphenol-formaldehyde resin. Contact Dermatitis 47:40–46CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Zimerson E, Bruze M (2002c) Low-molecular-weight contact allergens in p- tert-butylphenol-formaldehyde resin. Am J Contact Dermat 13:190–197CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Zimerson E, Bruze M (2002d) Contact allergy to the monomers in p- tert-butylphenol-formaldehyde resin. Contact Dermatitis 47:147–153CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Zimerson E, Bruze M, Goossens A (1999) Simultaneous p- tert-butylphenol- formaldehyde resin and p- tert-butylcatechol allergies in man and sensitizing capacities of p- tert-butylphenol and p- tert-butylcatechol in the guinea pig. J Occup Environ Med 41:23–28CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Occupational and Environmental DermatologyLund University/Skåne, University HospitalMalmöSweden
  2. 2.University of California Medical SchoolSan FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations