Advertisement

Cleaners

  • Andrea Bauer
Living reference work entry

Abstract

Prevanlence of occupatinal hand dermatitis in cleaning is from 10–53% in different studies. Irritant contact dermatitis is more often reported than allergic contact dermatitis. Type IV sensitizations to rubber chemical and disinfectants are diagnosed freuqently. prevention strategies in cleaning must be revisited.

Keywords

Cleaners Occupational contact dermatitis Allergy Rubber chemical Disinfectants Irritation 

References

  1. Bauer A, Geier J, Elsner P (2002) Type IV allergy in the food processing industry: sensitization profiles in bakers, cooks and butchers. Contact Dermatitis 46:228–235CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bauer A, Geier J, Mahler V, Uter W (2015) Contact allergies in the German workforce: data of the IVDK network from 2003–2013. Hautarzt 66:652–664CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Dahlquist I, Fregert S (1970) Occupational dermatoses in hospital personnel. Berufsdermatosen 18:261–268PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Darsow U, Geier J, Struppek K, Rakoski J, Ring J (1997) Kontaktallergien bei Raumpflegerinnen. Derm Beruf Umwelt 45:221–225Google Scholar
  5. Dickel H, Kuss O, Schmidt A, Kretz J, Diepgen TL (2002) Importance of irritant contact dermatitis in occupational skin disease. Am J Clin Dermatol 3:283–289CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. DIN EN 374-3. Standard (2003–12) Protective gloves against chemicals and micro-organisms: part 3: determination of resistance to permeation by chemicals; German version EN 374-3; 2003Google Scholar
  7. Flyvholm MA (1993) Contact allergens in registered cleaning agents for industrial and household use. Br J IndMed 50:1043–1050Google Scholar
  8. Flyvholm MA (2005) Preservatives in registered chemical products. Contact Dermatitis 53:27–32CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Flyvholm MA, Andersen P (1993) Identification of formaldehyde releasers and occurrence of formaldehyde and formaldehyde releasers in registered chemical products. Am J IndMed 24:533–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gawkrodger DJ, Lloyd MH, Hunter JA (1986) Occupational skin disease in hospital cleaning and kitchen workers. Contact Dermatitis 15:132–135CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Geier J, Lessmann H, Uter W, Schnuch A (2003) Occupational rubber glove allergy: results of the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK), 1995–2001. Contact Dermatitis 48:39–44CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Hansen KS (1983) Occupational dermatoses in hospital cleaning women. Contact Dermatitis 9:343–351CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Jensen P, Thyssen JP, Johansen JD, Skare L, Menne T, Liden C (2011) Occupational hand eczema caused by nickel and evaluated by quantitative exposure assessment. Contact Dermatitis 64:32–36CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Josefson A, Färm G, Stymne B, Meding B (2006) Nickel allergy and hand eczema – a 20-year follow up. Contact Dermatitis 55:286–290CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Josefson A, Färm G, Magnuson A, Meding B (2009) Nickel allergy as a risk factor for hand eczema: a population-based study. Br J Dermatol 160:828–34CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Jungbauer FH, Van Der Harst JJ, Schuttelaar ML, Groothoff JW, Coenraads PJ (2004) Characteristics of wet work in the cleaning industry. Contact Dermatitis 51:131–134CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Knudsen BB, Larsen E, Egsgaard H, Menne T (1993) Release of thiurams and carbamates from rubber gloves. Contact Dermatitis 28:63–69CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Lammintausta K (1983) Hand dermatitis in different hospital workers, who perform wet work. Derm Beruf Umwelt 31:14–19PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Lammintausta K, Kalimo K, Havu VK (1982) Occurrence of contact allergy and hand eczemas in hospital wet work. Contact Dermatitis 8:84–90CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Lehman PA, Franz TJ, Guin JD (1994) Penetration of glutaraldehyde through glove material: tactylon versus natural rubber latex. Contact Dermatitis 30:176–177CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Liskowsky J, Geier J, Bauer A (2011) Contact allergy in the cleaning industry: analysis of contact allergy surveillance data from the Information Network od Dermatology. Contact dermatitis 65:159–166CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Lopes RA, Benatti MC, Zollner RL (2004) A review of latex sensitivity related to the use of latex gloves in hospitals. AORN J 80:64–71CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Mäkelä EA, Vainiotalo S, Peltonen K (2003) The permeability of surgical gloves to seven chemicals commonly used in hospitals. Ann Occup Hyg 47:313–323CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Meding B, Liden C, Berglind N (2001) Self-diagnosed dermatitis in adults. Results from a population survey in Stockholm. Contact Dermatitis 45:341–345CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Mirabelli MC, Vizcaya D, Marti Margarit A, Anto JM, Arjona L, Barreiro E, Orriols R, Gimenz-Arnau A, Zock JP (2012) Occupational risk factors for hand dermatitis among professional cleaners in Spain. Contact dermatitis 66:188–96CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Molin S, Bauer A, Schnuch A, Geier J (2015) Occupational contact allergy in nurses: results from the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology 2003–2012. Contact Dermatitis 72:164–171CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Nielsen J (1996) The occurrence and course of skin symptoms on the hands among female cleaners. Contact Dermatitis 34:284–291CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Pesonen M, Suomela S, Kuuliala O, Henriks-Eckerman ML, Aalto-Korte K (2013) Occupational contact dermatitis caused by D-limonene. Contact Dermatitis 71:273–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pesonen M, Jolanki R, Larese Filon F, Wilkinson M, Kręcisz B, Kieć-Świerczyńska M, Bauer A, Mahler V, John SM, Schnuch A, Uter W, ESSCA network (2015) Patch test results of the European baseline series among patients with occupational contact dermatitis across Europe – analyses of the European Surveillance System on Contact Allergy network, 2002–2010. Contact Dermatitis 72:154–163CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Schnuch A, UterW GJ, Frosch PJ, Rustemeyer T (1998) Contact allergies in healthcare workers. Results from the IVDK. Acta Derm Venereol 78:358–363CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Schwensen JF, Friis UF, Menné T, Flyvholm MA, Johansen JD (2017) Contact allergy to preservatives in patients with occupational contact dermatitis and exposure analysis of preservatives in registered chemical products for occupational use. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 90:319–333CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Singgih SI, Lantinga H, Nater JP, Woest TE, Kruyt-Gaspersz JA (1986) Occupational hand dermatoses in hospital cleaning personnel. Contact Dermatitis 14:14–19CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Stingeni L, Lapomarda V, Lisi P (1995) Occupational hand dermatitis in hospital environments. Contact Dermatitis 33:172–176CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Thyssen JP, Linneberg A, Menne T, Nielsen NH, Johansen JD (2009) The association between hand eczema and nickel allergy has weakened among young women in the general population following the Danish nickel regulation: results from two cross-sectional studies. Contact Dermatitis 61:342–348CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Uter W, Hegewald J, Pfahlberg A, Lessmann H, Schnuch A, Gefeller O (2010) Contact allergy to thiurams: multifactorial analysis of clinical surveillance data collected by the IVDK network. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 83:675–681CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Wilkinson JD, Shaw S, Andersen KE, Brandao FM, Bruynzeel DP, Bruze M, Camarasa JM, Diepgen TL, Ducombs G, Frosch PJ, Goossens A, Lachappelle JM, Lahti A, Menné T, Seidenari S, Tosti A, Wahlberg JE (2002) Monitoring levels of preservative sensitivity in Europe. A 10-year overview (1991–2000). Contact Dermatitis 46:207–210CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Dermatology, University Allergy CenterUniversity Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University of DresdenDresdenGermany

Personalised recommendations