Skip to main content

Evo-Devo and Niche Construction

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Evolutionary Developmental Biology

Abstract

Much thinking in evo-devo is dominated by a mindset that views traits and trait variants as emergent properties of genes and genomes, and environments as strictly external to and separable from the organisms that develop within them. Growing evidence accumulating across diverse fields is increasingly questioning the continued usefulness of this framework, resulting in calls for a more explicit recognition and integration of the interdependencies between development, environment, and phenotypic evolution. In the first section of this chapter, we review the ubiquitous and diverse roles that environmental conditions play in instructing developmental outcomes, as well as how failure to provide proper environmental signals can disrupt development or lead to the expression of novel phenotypic variants. In the second section, we discuss how the environmental conditions that organisms experience are often modified by the organisms themselves, how these interactions can reciprocally shape development, and how their study is best advanced within the context of niche construction theory. In the final section, we address how the integration of niche construction theory with five research programs central to evo-devo (i.e., evolutionary innovation and diversification, developmental bias, developmental plasticity, genetic accommodation, and inclusive inheritance) can lead to a more holistic and complete understanding of development and developmental evolution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abrahamson WG, Sattler JF, McCrea KD, Weis AE (1989) Variation in selection pressures on the goldenrod gall fly and the competitive interactions of its natural enemies. Oecologia 79:15–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal AA, Vala F, Sabelis MW (2002) Induction of preference and performance after acclimation to novel hosts in a phytophagous spider mite: adaptive plasticity? Am Nat 159:553–565

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Badyaev AV (2009) Evolutionary significance of phenotypic accommodation in novel environments: an empirical test of the Baldwin effect. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 364:1125–1141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danchin É, Charmantier A, Champagne FA, Mesoudi A, Pujol B, Blanchet S (2011) Beyond DNA: integrating inclusive inheritance into an extended theory of evolution. Nat Rev Genet 12:475–486

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Erwin DH (2008) Macroevolution of ecosystem engineering, niche construction and diversity. Trends Ecol Evol 23:304–310

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert SF, Epel D (2015) Ecological developmental biology: the environmental regulation of development, health, and evolution. Sinauer Associates, Incorporated, Sunderland

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert SF, Sapp J, Tauber AI (2012) A symbiotic view of life: we have never been individuals. Q Rev Biol 87:325–341

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood PH (1965) Environmental effects on the pharyngeal mill of a cichlid fish, Astatoreochromis alluaudi, and their taxonomic implications. Proc Linnean Soc Lond 176:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kylafis G, Loreau M (2008) Ecological and evolutionary consequences of niche construction for its agent. Ecol Lett 11:1072–1081

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laland KN, Odling-Smee FJ, Feldman MW (1999) Evolutionary consequences of niche construction and their implications for ecology. Proc Natl Acad Sci 96:10242–10247

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Laland KN, Odling-Smee J, Gilbert SF (2008) EvoDevo and niche construction: building bridges. J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol 310:549–566

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laland K, Wray GA, Hoekstra HE (2014) Does evolutionary theory need a rethink? Nature 514:161

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Landmann F, Foster JM, Michalski ML, Slatko BE, Sullivan W (2014) Co-evolution between an endosymbiont and its nematode host: Wolbachia asymmetric posterior localization and AP polarity establishment. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 8:e3096

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ledon-Rettig CC, Pfennig DW, Nascone-Yoder N (2008) Ancestral variation and the potential for genetic accommodation in larval amphibians: implications for the evolution of novel feeding strategies. Evol Dev 10:316–325

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin RC (1983) The organism as the subject and object of evolution. Scientia 118:63–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Odling-Smee FJ, Laland KN, Feldman MW (2003) Niche construction: the neglected process in evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Paaby AB, Rockman MV (2014) Cryptic genetic variation: evolution’s hidden substrate. Nat Rev Genet 15:247–258

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pfennig D, Wund MA, Snell-Rood EC, Cruickshank T, Schlichting CD, Moczek AP (2010) Phenotypic plasticity’s impacts on diversification and speciation. Trends Ecol Evol 25:459–467

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rohner N, Jarosz DF, Kowalko JE, Yoshizawa M, Jeffery WR, Borowsky RL, Lindquist S, Tabin CJ (2013) Cryptic variation in morphological evolution: HSP90 as a capacitor for loss of eyes in cavefish. Science 342:1372–1375

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Saltz JB, Nuzhdin SV (2014) Genetic variation in niche construction: implications for development and evolutionary genetics. Trends Ecol Evol 29:8–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schlichting CD, Pigliucci M (1998) Phenotypic evolution: a reaction norm perspective. Sinauer Associates Incorporated, Sunderland

    Google Scholar 

  • Scoville AG, Pfrender ME (2010) Phenotypic plasticity facilitates recurrent rapid adaptation to introduced predators. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107:4260–4263

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Shikuma NJ, Pilhofer M, Weiss GL, Hadfield MG, Jensen GJ, Newman DK (2014) Marine tubeworm metamorphosis induced by arrays of bacterial phage tail–like structures. Science 343:529–533

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Silver M, Di Paolo E (2006) Spatial effects favour the evolution of niche construction. Theor Popul Biol 70:387–400

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Standen EM, TY D, Larsson HC (2014) Developmental plasticity and the origin of tetrapods. Nature 513:54–58

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • West-Eberhard MJ (2005) Phenotypic accommodation: adaptive innovation due to developmental plasticity. J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol 304:610–618

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wund MA, Baker JA, Clancy B, Golub JL, Foster SA (2008) A test of the “flexible stem” model of evolution: ancestral plasticity, genetic accommodation, and morphological divergence in the threespine stickleback radiation. Am Nat 172:449–462

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel B. Schwab .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

Schwab, D.B., Moczek, A.P. (2017). Evo-Devo and Niche Construction. In: Nuno de la Rosa, L., Müller, G. (eds) Evolutionary Developmental Biology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33038-9_46-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33038-9_46-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-33038-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-33038-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Biomedicine and Life SciencesReference Module Biomedical and Life Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics