Evo-Devo and Niche Construction

Living reference work entry


Much thinking in evo-devo is dominated by a mindset that views traits and trait variants as emergent properties of genes and genomes, and environments as strictly external to and separable from the organisms that develop within them. Growing evidence accumulating across diverse fields is increasingly questioning the continued usefulness of this framework, resulting in calls for a more explicit recognition and integration of the interdependencies between development, environment, and phenotypic evolution. In the first section of this chapter, we review the ubiquitous and diverse roles that environmental conditions play in instructing developmental outcomes, as well as how failure to provide proper environmental signals can disrupt development or lead to the expression of novel phenotypic variants. In the second section, we discuss how the environmental conditions that organisms experience are often modified by the organisms themselves, how these interactions can reciprocally shape development, and how their study is best advanced within the context of niche construction theory. In the final section, we address how the integration of niche construction theory with five research programs central to evo-devo (i.e., evolutionary innovation and diversification, developmental bias, developmental plasticity, genetic accommodation, and inclusive inheritance) can lead to a more holistic and complete understanding of development and developmental evolution.


Ecological development Developmental plasticity Developmental bias Genetic accommodation Non-genetic inheritance 


  1. Abrahamson WG, Sattler JF, McCrea KD, Weis AE (1989) Variation in selection pressures on the goldenrod gall fly and the competitive interactions of its natural enemies. Oecologia 79:15–22CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Agrawal AA, Vala F, Sabelis MW (2002) Induction of preference and performance after acclimation to novel hosts in a phytophagous spider mite: adaptive plasticity? Am Nat 159:553–565CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Badyaev AV (2009) Evolutionary significance of phenotypic accommodation in novel environments: an empirical test of the Baldwin effect. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 364:1125–1141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Danchin É, Charmantier A, Champagne FA, Mesoudi A, Pujol B, Blanchet S (2011) Beyond DNA: integrating inclusive inheritance into an extended theory of evolution. Nat Rev Genet 12:475–486CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Erwin DH (2008) Macroevolution of ecosystem engineering, niche construction and diversity. Trends Ecol Evol 23:304–310CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Gilbert SF, Epel D (2015) Ecological developmental biology: the environmental regulation of development, health, and evolution. Sinauer Associates, Incorporated, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  7. Gilbert SF, Sapp J, Tauber AI (2012) A symbiotic view of life: we have never been individuals. Q Rev Biol 87:325–341CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Greenwood PH (1965) Environmental effects on the pharyngeal mill of a cichlid fish, Astatoreochromis alluaudi, and their taxonomic implications. Proc Linnean Soc Lond 176:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kylafis G, Loreau M (2008) Ecological and evolutionary consequences of niche construction for its agent. Ecol Lett 11:1072–1081CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Laland KN, Odling-Smee FJ, Feldman MW (1999) Evolutionary consequences of niche construction and their implications for ecology. Proc Natl Acad Sci 96:10242–10247CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Laland KN, Odling-Smee J, Gilbert SF (2008) EvoDevo and niche construction: building bridges. J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol 310:549–566CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Laland K, Wray GA, Hoekstra HE (2014) Does evolutionary theory need a rethink? Nature 514:161CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Landmann F, Foster JM, Michalski ML, Slatko BE, Sullivan W (2014) Co-evolution between an endosymbiont and its nematode host: Wolbachia asymmetric posterior localization and AP polarity establishment. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 8:e3096CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Ledon-Rettig CC, Pfennig DW, Nascone-Yoder N (2008) Ancestral variation and the potential for genetic accommodation in larval amphibians: implications for the evolution of novel feeding strategies. Evol Dev 10:316–325CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Lewontin RC (1983) The organism as the subject and object of evolution. Scientia 118:63–82Google Scholar
  16. Odling-Smee FJ, Laland KN, Feldman MW (2003) Niche construction: the neglected process in evolution. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  17. Paaby AB, Rockman MV (2014) Cryptic genetic variation: evolution’s hidden substrate. Nat Rev Genet 15:247–258CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Pfennig D, Wund MA, Snell-Rood EC, Cruickshank T, Schlichting CD, Moczek AP (2010) Phenotypic plasticity’s impacts on diversification and speciation. Trends Ecol Evol 25:459–467CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Rohner N, Jarosz DF, Kowalko JE, Yoshizawa M, Jeffery WR, Borowsky RL, Lindquist S, Tabin CJ (2013) Cryptic variation in morphological evolution: HSP90 as a capacitor for loss of eyes in cavefish. Science 342:1372–1375CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Saltz JB, Nuzhdin SV (2014) Genetic variation in niche construction: implications for development and evolutionary genetics. Trends Ecol Evol 29:8–14CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Schlichting CD, Pigliucci M (1998) Phenotypic evolution: a reaction norm perspective. Sinauer Associates Incorporated, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  22. Scoville AG, Pfrender ME (2010) Phenotypic plasticity facilitates recurrent rapid adaptation to introduced predators. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107:4260–4263CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Shikuma NJ, Pilhofer M, Weiss GL, Hadfield MG, Jensen GJ, Newman DK (2014) Marine tubeworm metamorphosis induced by arrays of bacterial phage tail–like structures. Science 343:529–533CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Silver M, Di Paolo E (2006) Spatial effects favour the evolution of niche construction. Theor Popul Biol 70:387–400CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Standen EM, TY D, Larsson HC (2014) Developmental plasticity and the origin of tetrapods. Nature 513:54–58CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. West-Eberhard MJ (2005) Phenotypic accommodation: adaptive innovation due to developmental plasticity. J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol 304:610–618CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Wund MA, Baker JA, Clancy B, Golub JL, Foster SA (2008) A test of the “flexible stem” model of evolution: ancestral plasticity, genetic accommodation, and morphological divergence in the threespine stickleback radiation. Am Nat 172:449–462CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiologyIndiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Sergio Balari
    • 1
  1. 1.Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona and Centre de Linguística TeòricaBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations