Knowledge Management in the Public Sector

Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_4278-1
  • 21 Downloads

Introduction

Knowledge management (KM) in the public sector encompasses unique features (Asian Productivity Organization 2013, P. 17) which are commonly rooted in the relationship between citizens and governments. Through mutual interaction, citizens and the government interact for the institutionalization of the rule of law, national security, international credibility, public welfare, public health, inclusive vitality, lifelong education for all, and advanced scientific, cultural, and social infrastructure. However, in the private sector, other factors such as market share, profit, cost-benefit, and market formulas play more important roles than the mutual interaction between the citizens and the private sector. Despite the existence of common features between the two sectors there are still certain discrepancies in the nature of citizens’ interactions with the two sectors.

From the KM perspective, the public sector holds exclusive dimensions, which inspires the coordinates of KM in...
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Asian Productivity Organization (2013) In: Talisayon S (ed) Report on the APO research on knowledge management for public-sector productivity (11-RP-09-GE-RES-B). Asian Productivity Organization, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  2. Graham I, Logan J, Harrison M, Straus S, Tetroe J, Caswell W, Robinson N (2006) Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map? J Contin Educ Heal Prof 26:13–24.  https://doi.org/10.1002/chp.47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Hasani K, Sheikhesmaeili S (2016) Knowledge management and employee empowerment: a study of higher education institutions. Kybernetes 45(2):337–355.  https://doi.org/10.1108/K-04-2014-0077CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hassanzadeh M (2013) Competencies of knowledge and information specialists for knowledge managements in organizations. Kolliyat Book Monthly 188:2–5Google Scholar
  5. King WR, Ko D (2001) Evaluating knowledge management and the learning organization: an information/knowledge value chain approach. Commun Assoc Inf Syst 5(14):1–26Google Scholar
  6. López-Nicolás C, Ángel L, Meroño-Cerdán (2011) Strategic knowledge management, innovation and performance. Int J Inf Manag 31(6):502–509., ISSN 0268-4012.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2011.02.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Nonaka I (1991) The knowledge-creating company. Harvard Bus Rev, USAGoogle Scholar
  8. OECD (2019) A measurement roadmap for the future. In: Measuring the digital transformation: a roadmap for the future, OECD Publishing, Paris, [Online]. Available at: www.oecd.org/going-digital/measurement-roadmap.pdf
  9. Raudeliūnienė J, Davidavičienė V, Jakubavičius A (2018) Knowledge management process model. Entrepreneurship Sustain Issues, Entrepreneurship Sustain Center 5(3):542–554. ff10.9770/jesi.2018.5.3(10)ff. ffhal-01773979fCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Riege A, Lindsay N (2006) Knowledge Management in the Public Sector: stakeholder partnerships in the public policy development. J Knowl Manag 10:3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Siami-Namini S (2018) Knowledge management challenges in public sectors. Res. J. Econ 2(3)Google Scholar
  12. Stein EW (1995) Organization memory: review of concepts and recommendations for management. Int J Inf Manag 15(1):17–32., ISSN 0268-4012.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0268-4012(94)00003-CCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Knowledge and Information Science DepartmentTarbiat Modares UniversityTehranIran