Skip to main content

Philippine Public Administration: 5Es and an A

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance

Synonyms

Expansion of classic framework of Public Administration; Government principles; Philippine Public Administration

Definition

5 Es and an A is a conceptual framework that seeks to expand the classic framework of Public Administration given the context of a developing country like the Philippines that grapples with well-entrenched issues of inequality, lack of inclusive growth, nepotism, and corruption.

Introduction

The discipline of Public Administration has many times been considered a sub-field of the general field of management and administration, and thus, tends to focus on the three general classic concerns of economic, efficiency, and effectiveness, also referred to as the 3 Es of Public Administration. However, given the context of the Philippines, a developing country that has been confronted with deeply rooted issues on inequalities, lack of inclusive growth, nepotism, and corruption, Public Administration has always gone beyond the traditional 3Es – and it is not...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alfiler MCP (1979) Administrative measures against bureaucratic corruption: the Philippine experience. Philippi J Public Admin 23(3–4):321–349

    Google Scholar 

  • ASEAN (2019) ASEAN key figures 2019. ASEAN Secretariat, Jakarta

    Google Scholar 

  • Asian Development Bank (2009) Poverty in the Philippines: causes, constraints, and opportunities. Asian Development Bank, Mandaluyong

    Google Scholar 

  • Brillantes A, Fernandez M (2008) Is there a Philippine public administration? Or better still, for whom is Philippine public administration? Philippi J Public Admin 12(2–4):245–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Brillantes A, Perante-Calina L (2018) Leadership and public sector reform in the Philippines. In: Berman E, Prasojo E (eds) Leadership and public sector reform in Asia. Emerald Publishing, Bingley

    Google Scholar 

  • Brillantes A, Lopos BE, Perante-Calina L (2018) Knowledge-based public sector reform: The Philippine experience. In: Nishihara AH, Matsunaga M, Nonaka I, Yokomichi K (eds) Knowledge creation in Public Administrations: Innovative government in Southeast Asia and Japan (pp.211–236). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Brillantes A, Raquiza MV, Lorenzo MP (2019) Social equity in the Philippines: a continuing but elusive promise. In: Morgen J (ed) Social equity in the Asia-Pacific region: conceptualizations and realities. Palgrave Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Brillantes A, Lorenzo MP, Dacumos BN, Comia AS, Perante-Calina L (2020) The imperatives of peace for development in the Philippines: how the Galing Pook innovation awards provide hope it can be done. In: Alampay EG, Suarez GM (eds) Local matters: experiences in autonomy, decentralization and beyond. University of the Philippines, Center for Local and Regional Governance, Quezon City, pp 347–375

    Google Scholar 

  • Caiden GE (1991) What really is public maladministration? Public Adm Rev 51(6):486–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cariño LV (1983) Administrative accountability: a review of the evolution, meaning, and operationalization of a key concept in public administration. Philippi J Public Admin 27(2):118–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Corpuz OD (1965) The Philippines. Englewood cliffs. Prentice Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Demin A (2016) The effectiveness of local government. In: Farazmand A (ed) Global encyclopedia of public administration, public policy, and governance. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Demmke C, Moilanen T (2012) Effectiveness of public-service ethics and good governance in the central administration of the EU-27. Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Domingo MOZ, Reyes DR (2011) Performance management reforms in the Philippines. In: Berman EM (ed) Public Administration in Southeast Asia: Thailand, Philippines, Malaysia, Hong Kong, and Macao (pp. 397–421). CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group, Boca Baton, London, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Endriga JS (1979) Historical notes on graft and corruption in the Philippines. Philippi J Public Admin 23(3–4):241–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Erkoc TE (2017) Bureaucracy and efficiency. In: Farazmand A (ed) Global encyclopedia of public administration, public policy, and governance. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederickson HG (1990) Public administration and social equity. Public Adm Rev 50:228–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frederickson HG (2010) Social equity and public administration: origins, developments, and applications. M.E. Sharpe, Armonk

    Google Scholar 

  • Gooden S, Portillo S (2011) Advancing social equity in the Minnowbrook tradition. J Public Adm Res Theory 21(1):61–76. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Intal PS (2002) The persistence of poverty in the Philippines: is globalization the culprit? Asia Pac Soc Sci Rev 3(2):1–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangahas M (2001) Update on surveys concerning corruption. World Bank, Manila

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilar N (1982) The relevance of the new PA in Philippine public administration. Philippi J Public Admin 26(3–4):228–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Reyes D (2003a) Public administration in the Philippines: history, heritage and hubris. In: Bautista VA (ed) Introduction to public Administration in the Philippines: a reader. University of the Philippines, Quezon City, pp 39–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Reyes D (2003b) The identity crisis in public administration revisited: some definitional issues and the Philippine setting. In: Bautista VA (ed) Introduction to public Administration in the Philippines: a reader. University of the Philippines, Quezon City, pp 18–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbloom DH, Kravchuk RS (2005) Public administration: understanding management, politics and law in the public sector. Mc Graw Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau J-J (1992) Discourse on the origin of inequality. Hackett Publishing Co., Indianapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutgers MR (1998) Paradigm lost: crisis as identity of the study of public administration. Int Rev Adm Sci 64(4):553–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutledge PJ (2002) Some unfinished business in public administration. Public Adm Rev 62(4):390–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman T (1998) Public sector ethics: prospects and challenges. In: Sampford C, Preston N, Bois C-A (eds) Public sector ethics: finding and implementing values. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart D (1985) Ethics and the profession of public administration: The moral responsibility of individuals in public sector organizations. Public Administration Quarterly 8(4):487–495

    Google Scholar 

  • The 1987 Philippine Constitution of the Republic of the Philippines. Retrieved on 23 February 2020 from https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/constitutions/1987-constitution/

  • Transparency International (2012) Corruption Perceptions index. Retrieved on 5 October 2020 from https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2012/results

  • Transparency International (2013) Corruption perceptions index. Retrieved on 5 October 2020 from https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2013/results

  • Transparency International (2014) Corruption perceptions index. Retrieved on 5 October 2020 from https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2014/results

  • Transparency International (2015) Corruption perceptions index. Retrieved on 5 October 2020 from https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2015/results

  • Transparency International (2016) Corruption perceptions index. Retrieved on 5 October 2020 from https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2016/results

  • Transparency International (2017) Corruption perceptions index. Retrieved on 5 October 2020 from https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2017/results

  • Transparency International (2018) Corruption perceptions index. Retrieved on 5 October 2020 from https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2018/results

  • Transparency International (2019) Corruption perceptions index. Retrieved on 5 October 2020 from https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2019/results/phl

  • United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (2006) What is good governance? Retrieved on 23 February 2020 from https://www.unescap.org/sites/default/files/good-governance.pdf

  • Valera AP (1996) Administrative culture and political change. College of Public Administration, University of the Philippines, Quezon City

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldo D (1953) Ideas and issues in public administration. Mc Graw Hill Book, Co., Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldo D (1980) The enterprise of public administration. Chandler & Sharp, Novato

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson W (1887) The study of administration. Polit Sci Q 2(2):197–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge B, Gooden S (2009) The epic of social equity. Admin Theory Prax 31(2):222–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alex B. Brillantes .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Brillantes, A.B., Lorenzo, M.P. (2021). Philippine Public Administration: 5Es and an A. In: Farazmand, A. (eds) Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_4134-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_4134-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-31816-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31816-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics