School Bureaucracy

  • Nevbahar Ertas
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3645-1

Definition

Refers to the administrative systems governing the public school systems.

Synonyms

Introduction

Bureaucracy is the dominant administrative system governing large institutions, including schools in the United States’ (US) education system. Public education is the largest category of state and local spending in the United States and consequently the nation’s largest bureaucracy. In fact, Meier et al. (1999) noted that “the model bureaucrat is more likely to grade papers in Des Moines than shuffle them in Washington” (p. 1027), referring to school systems being the largest public sector employers in the country.

The purpose of this entry is to provide a concise overview of bureaucratic features of schools and education systems, focusing on school bureaucracy in primary or secondary education in the United States. The discussion contains a concise review of public administration scholarship related to...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Bauman PC (1996) Governing Education: Public Sector Reform or Privatization. Allyn & Bacon, A Simon & Schuster Company, Needham HeightsGoogle Scholar
  2. Bohte J (2001) School bureaucracy and student performance at the local level. Public Adm Rev 61(1):92–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chubb JE, Moe TM (1990) Politics, markets and schools. The Brookings Institution, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  4. Grissom JA, Kern EC, Rodriguez LA (2015) The “representative bureaucracy” in education: Educator workforce diversity, policy outputs, and outcomes for disadvantaged students. Educ Res 44(3):185–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hannaway J, Carnoy M (1993) Decentralization and school improvement: can we fulfill the promise? Jossey-Bass Publishers, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  6. Hoy WK, Sweetland SR (2001) Designing better schools: the meaning and measure of enabling school structures. Educ Adm Q 37(3):296–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Krueger AB (1998) Reassessing the view that American schools are broken. Econ Policy Rev 4(1):29–43Google Scholar
  8. Meier KJ, Bohte J (2001) Structure and discretion: missing links in representative bureaucracy. J Public Adm Res Theory 11(4):455–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Meier KJ, Wrinkle RD, Polinard JL (1999) Representative bureaucracy and distributional equity: Addressing the hard question. J Politics 61(4):1025–1039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. National Education Association (2018, April) Rankings of the states 2017 and estimates of school statistics 2018. NEA Research, Washington, DC. Retrieved 26 Sept 2018 from http://www.nea.org/home/73145.htm
  11. Raffel JA (2007) Why has public administration ignored public education, and does it matter? Public Adm Rev 67(1):135–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Smith KB, Larimer CW (2004) A mixed relationship: bureaucracy and school performance. Public Adm Rev 64(6):728–736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Smith KB, Meier KJ (1994) Politics, bureaucrats, and schools. Public Adm Rev 54(6):551–558Google Scholar
  14. Stone DA (1997) Policy paradox: the art of political decision making, revised edition. W. W. Norton & Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Svara JH (2001) The myth of the dichotomy: complementarity of politics and administration in the past and future of public administration. Public Adm Rev 61(2):176–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. U.S. Department of Education (2017) National Center for Education Statistics, Common Core of Data (CCD), Local Education Agency Universe Survey, 2014–15 and 2015–16Google Scholar
  17. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics (2018) Digest of Education Statistics, 2016 (NCES 2017-094)Google Scholar
  18. Weber M (1947) The theory of social and economic organizations (trans: Henderson AM, Parsons T). Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Wilson W (1966) The papers of Woodrow Wilson, vol 5. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political Science and Public AdministrationUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamBirminghamUSA