Citizen Participation: Rationales and Approaches

  • Cristina MititeluEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3635-1

Synonyms

Definition

Citizen participation is a process by which citizens’ concerns and needs are encompassed in the policy decision-making process of the local authority. The process requires a combination of joined relationships – an activity in which citizens attempt to affect government decisions to improve them, while the local authority activities should match the citizen’s views and needs appropriately.

Introduction

Citizen participation is generally held to be a good thing in the public administrative decision-making. The focus on citizen participation increased in practice mainly because government officials have assumed more responsibilities in the local governance of the communities and with much less and limited resources. But also they realized the opportunities associated with the process, as it provides valuable insights on the needs, priorities, and information on what it matters to the local community.

Over the past...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. André P, Martin P, Lanmafankpotin G (2012) Citizen participation. In: Côté L, Savard JF (eds) Encyclopedic dictionary of public administration. Retrieved at www.dictionnaire.enap.com
  2. Ansell C, Gash A (2007) Collaborative governance in theory and practice. J Public Adm Res Theory 18:543–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arnstein S (1969) Ladder of citizen participation. J Am Inst Plann 35(4):216–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Callahan K (2007) Citizen participation: Models and,methods, International Journal of Public Administration 30(11):1179–1196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Creighton JL (2005) The public participation handbook: making better decisions through citizen involvement. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco. Willey ImprintGoogle Scholar
  6. Denhardt RB, Denhardt JV (2000) The new public service: serving rather than steering. Public Adm Rev 60(6):549–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Denhardt JV, Denhardt RB (2003) The new public service: serving, not steering, London: England, Armonk: New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Denhardt VJ, Denhardt BR (2011) The new public service: serving, not steering. M.E. Sharpe, USAGoogle Scholar
  9. Dragos D, Neamtu B, Hamlin RE (2008) Good governance – a multifaceted concept. In: Cobarzan B, Dragos D, Neamtu B (ed) Administrative transparency in Romania. An empirical study. Accent, Cluj NapocaGoogle Scholar
  10. Eikenberry AM (2007) Philanthropy, voluntary association and governance beyond the state: giving circles and challenges for democracy. Adm Soc 39(7):857–882, ESDN Quarterly Report September 2008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. EUPAN (2008) European Primer on Customer Satisfaction Management, Italian version of the document is available on the website of the Department of Public Administration. Retrived at www.qualitapa.gov.it
  12. Fung A (2006) Varieties of participation in complex governance. Special issue. Public Adm Rev 66:65–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gaventa J, Valderrama C (1999) Participation, citizenship and local governance – background paper for workshop: Strengthening participation in local governance, mimeo, IDS, BrightonGoogle Scholar
  14. Kettl DF, Fesler JW (2008) The politics of the administrative process, 4th edition. Sage, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  15. King CS, Feltey CM, Susel ON (1998) The questions of participation: towards authentic public participation in public administration. Public Adm Rev 58(4):317–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Klijn EH, Koppenjan JFM (2000) Politicians and interactive decision making: institutional spoilsports or playmaker? Public Adm 78:365–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Langton S (1978) What is citizen participation? In: Langton S (ed) Citizen participation in America. Lexington Books, LexingtonGoogle Scholar
  18. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development [OECD] (2001) Citizens as partners – handbook on information, consultation and public participation in policy-making. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  19. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development [OECD] (2005a) Engaging citizens in policymaking. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  20. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development [OECD] (2005b) Services to citizens. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  21. Pestoff V, Brandsen T, Verschuere B (2012) New public governance, the third sector, and Co-production, RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  22. Peters G, Pierre J (2003) Handbook of public administration. SAGE Publications, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. Roberts N (2004) Public deliberation in an age of direct citizen participation. Am Rev Public Adm 34(4):315–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Slay J, Stephens L (2013) Co-production in mental health: a literature review. New Economics Foundation (NEF), LondonGoogle Scholar
  25. Svara JH, Denhardt J (2010) The connected community: local governments as partners in citizen engagement and community building. Phoenix, AZ: Alliance for InnovationGoogle Scholar
  26. Thomas JC (1995) Public participation in public decisions: new skills and strategies for public managers. Josey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  27. Thomas JC (2012) Citizen, customer, and partner: Engaging the public in public management. Armonk, NY, M.E. SharpeGoogle Scholar
  28. Torfing J, Peters BG, Pierre J, Sorensen E (2012) Interactive governance. Advancing the paradigm. Oxford University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Vigoda E (2002) From responsiveness to collaboration: governance, citizens, and the next generation of public administration. Public Adm Rev 62:527–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Vigoda E (2003) Performance and democracy’ in the public sector: exploring some missing links in the study of administration and society (part A: administrative performance, trust in governance, and social equality). Int J Public Adm 26:883–890CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Management and LawUniversity of Rome Tor VergataRomeItaly
  2. 2.Open University Business SchoolFaculty of Business and LawMilton KeynesUK